Health Care

States Assume Leadership Role in Providing Emergency Medical Services Gao ID: HRD-86-132 September 30, 1986

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the status of emergency medical services programs in the United States, specifically: (1) the effect of the transition from federal to state leadership under the Preventive Health and Health Services block grant on local emergency medical services; and (2) the significant issues and barriers affecting the appropriate and timely delivery of local emergency medical services.

GAO reviewed six states' practices and found that: (1) states have taken more control of financing and regulating the local delivery of emergency medical services; (2) states have increased funding for emergency medical services by 28 percent since 1983; (3) states could better coordinate their federal highway safety funds with their overall emergency medical services strategies; (4) more than 50 percent of the nation does not have access to the emergency telephone number 911 because of high installation and operating costs and local ambulance services' reluctance to join an areawide telephone receiving system, resulting in less timely delivery of emergency services; (5) many rural areas lack advanced life support ambulance services; (6) many states do not have specialized trauma centers; and (7) because trauma centers treat a disproportionate share of severe cases, the averaging aspect of payment under Medicare's diagnosis-related groups (DRG) method may not adequately compensate them. GAO believes Congress should: (1) promote broader 911 coverage by implementing a federal loan program to finance 911 start-up costs and permitting existing loan funds to be used by local governments for 911 implementation; and (2) permit local areas to replace outmoded communications equipment using block grant funds.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.