Health Insurance

Risk Pools for the Medically Uninsurable Gao ID: HRD-88-66BR April 13, 1988

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed 15 state-administered health insurance risk-pool programs to determine: (1) the programs' characteristics, enrollment, and financial experience; (2) the characteristics of the people they insure; and (3) their success in meeting expectations.

GAO found that: (1) risk-pool programs provide health insurance to persons who cannot otherwise obtain it because their health conditions make them unacceptable risks to private insurance companies; (2) program enrollees generally have large deductibles and their premiums are 25 to 50 percent higher than private health insurance plan premiums; (3) despite the high premiums, the programs require subsidies, and most states assess deficits against insurers doing business in the state and allow insurers to credit their share of risk-pool deficits against state premium or corporate income taxes; and (4) most of the programs consistently operated at a loss and paid an average of $1.60 in claims for each dollar of premium income in 1986, while private insurers paid $0.87 in claims per dollar. GAO also found that: (1) most states granted eligibility to persons that insurance companies either refused to cover, or to whom they offered only limited or high-cost coverage; (2) 7 of the 15 states studied allowed applicants with specified diseases to enroll without meeting other requirements; (3) most of the enrollees were middle-aged, about half of those were female, and most incurred higher-than-average expenses for heart and circulatory diseases, cancer, and diabetes; (4) although most states did not know the number of persons enrolled with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, they believed that the risk pools could help finance treatment costs; and (5) states believed that their programs did not serve all eligible individuals.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.