Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone

FDA Approval Should Be Withheld Until the Mastitis Issue Is Resolved Gao ID: PEMD-92-26 August 6, 1992

Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has followed critical review guidelines for animal safety and drug efficacy in approving the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone to boost milk production, FDA has skirted the issue of whether the animal drug might pose indirect health risks for people. Such risks are not covered by FDA guidelines and have not been addressed in the case of recombinant bovine growth hormone. The increased milk production triggered by the hormone has lead to an outbreak of mastitis among cows, and increased residues of the antibiotics used to treat this condition could be showing up in milk and beef. Also, food products from cows treated with the hormone have been commercially processed and sold to consumers without any warning labels. FDA does not require the labeling of food products derived from animals involved in drug treatment trials.

GAO found that: (1) recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) is orally inactive and species specific; (2) the structure of rBGH is significantly different from that of humans, making it inactive and unharmful in humans; (3) FDA considers additional rBGH research on human safety risks to be unnecessary; (4) FDA guidelines sufficiently addressed animal safety requirements, but reproductive issues remain unresolved; (5) the critical drug efficacy guidelines for rBGH have been met; (6) FDA studies and other reports show that rBGH increases the mastitis rate in cows by as much as 33 percent; (7) increased mastitis leads to increases in bovine antibiotic treatment, which greatens the potential of antibiotic residues in milk and beef; (8) FDA and drug sponsors have not tested for or addressed human tolerances of increased antibiotic residues in milk or beef; (9) rBGH sponsors often fail to adhere to FDA protocol study guidelines; (10) FDA lack of labelling requirements during the investigational research phase of review allows rBGH treated products to be marketed without adequate public knowledge; and (11) the lack of a systematic tracking procedure to monitor firms and drug dosages compromises efficiency and effectiveness of the FDA review process.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.