Medicare

Greater Investment in Claims Review Would Save Millions Gao ID: HEHS-94-35 March 2, 1994

Given soaring U.S. health care costs and shrinking budgets for many government programs, Congress is concerned that Medicare pay only for appropriate medical services without compromising the quality of care provided to beneficiaries. One of the several ways that Medicare ensures proper payments is through the medical review function performed by contractors--called carriers--who process and pay claims for physician services, diagnostic tests, and other Medicare part B services. Review activities are designed to prevent spending on inappropriate, medically unnecessary, or excessive services. This report assesses a Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) demonstration that involves medical review operations at five carriers: three of these were given added management flexibility and funding to enhance their medical review function and two served as comparisons. This report discusses whether (1) the improved medical review activities at the demonstration carriers produced measurable savings or benefits to the claims process; (2) more medical review funding for other carriers would be cost-effective; and (3) HCFA's medical review oversight needs improvement.

GAO found that: (1) Medicare demonstration carriers have saved millions through increased medical reviews; (2) the demonstration carriers have improved their analytical tools, medical policies, and other payment controls to identify claims for inappropriate or unnecessary services; (3) spending more money on medical review activities can yield substantial Medicare program savings; (4) funding for medical review activities declined from 1989 to 1992, and increases are unlikely; and (5) HCFA carrier performance evaluations provide carriers with few incentives to improve their medical review programs.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.