Cost Factors in CARE Act Formulas

Gao ID: HEHS-95-256R September 15, 1995

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effects of proposed acquired immune deficiency syndrome Title I and II funding on eligible metropolitan areas (EMA) and states. GAO noted that: (1) the proposed funding formula, with no cost factor, would increase Title I funding for 30 EMA, decrease funding for 10 EMA, and remain the same for 9 EMA; (2) after 5 years, Title I funding would increase for 32 EMA, decrease for 10 EMA, and remain the same for 7 EMA; (3) Title II funding with no cost factor, would increase during the first year for 15 states, decrease for 13 states, and remain the same for 26 states; (4) some states' Title II funding would remain unaffected because they received minimum grants, reached the funding floor, or were exempt from losing additional funds; and (5) after 5 years, Title II funding would increase for 19 states, decrease for 17 states, and remain the same for 18 states.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.