Medical Malpractice

Federal Tort Claims Act Coverage Could Reduce Health Centers' Costs Gao ID: HEHS-97-57 April 14, 1997

Federally funded community and migrant health centers, which provide health care to more than 9 million people regardless of their ability to pay, are facing growing patient caseloads and increasing financial pressures. As a result, Congress gave these 716 centers an opportunity to reduce or eliminate their spending for private malpractice insurance--estimated at $50 million in 1994. By offering Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) coverage to these centers, the federal government has agreed to assume responsibility for malpractice claims against covered centers. Malpractice coverage provided by FTCA differs in many ways from that offered by private insurers. One of the significant differences is the lack of a monetary cap on liability coverage, which could play a significant role in determining the federal government's ultimate cost of providing FTCA coverage to community and migrant health centers. As more centers rely on FTCA for malpractice coverage, the federal government's potential liability will increase as will the need for risk management. The growth in FTCA coverage offers both the challenge of a greater federal liability to manage and a new opportunity to help community and migrant health centers improve the quality of their care.

GAO noted that: (1) the permanent authorization of FTCA coverage, the greater availability of supplemental policies to cover incidents not covered under FTCA, and the reports of some centers already realizing substantial savings have contributed to the willingness of many centers to now obtain FTCA coverage; (2) although the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) required centers to apply for FTCA coverage during the demonstration period, centers were not compelled to cancel their private comprehensive malpractice insurance; (3) although HRSA does not have complete data on center participation during the 3-year demonstration period, it appears that most centers retained their private comprehensive malpractice insurance during this time; (4) because these centers were covered by both FTCA and their private policies, they did not reduce their insurance costs; (5) of the 716 centers eligible for FTCA coverage, 452 have elected this coverage and are now required to cancel their private comprehensive malpractice insurance; (6) despite this level of participation, a significant number of centers have not reapplied for FTCA coverage since its recent extension; (7) as of March 21, 1997, 264 of the 716 centers eligible for FTCA coverage, or 37 percent, had not applied for it; (8) since the demonstration period began in 1993, there have been 138 claims filed against FTCA-covered centers alleging damages of more than $414 million; (9) however, the actual amount of the federal government's liability for these claims is unclear; (10) as of March 21, 1997, only five claims have been settled, with total payments of $355,250; (11) at the recommendation of HHS' Office of Inspector General, HRSA developed a legislative proposal that, if enacted, would limit the federal government's liability to $1 million for claims filed against FTCA-covered centers; (12) by extending FTCA coverage to centers, the federal government has assumed potential liabilities that need oversight and careful management; (13) HHS could improve its administration of FTCA coverage for community and migrant health centers by strengthening data collection efforts and claims management practices; (14) HHS has 6 months in which to either deny a claim or make a settlement offer before a claimant may file suit in federal court; (15) for 22 of the 32 claims that have resulted in federal lawsuits, HHS had not attempted to respond to the claimants during this 6-month period; and (16) risk management services can help centers minimize liability by reducing their financial exposure to claims.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.