Health Plan Quality Information

Efforts to Report on PPO Plan Performance Gao ID: HEHS-98-213R July 16, 1998

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on preferred provider organization (PPO) plan performance, focusing on: (1) large health care purchasers' efforts to collect and disseminate quality performance information about PPO plans; and (2) existing requirements for PPOs to demonstrate quality assurance efforts.

GAO noted that: (1) some of the largest health care purchasers in the country--the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), the federal Medicare program, and the Federal Employees Health Benefits program (FEHBP)--have collected or plan to collect and disseminate performance data from contracting health plans, including PPOs; (2) although the information requirements apply to all plans, the entities implementing the requirements recognize that not all performance indicators are appropriate for all types of plans; (3) for example, an indicator measuring the rate at which a PPO provides a specific preventive care service may not be appropriate for a PPO that does not cover that service in its benefits package; (4) other purchasers have been slower to collect quality-related information from PPOs due to difficulties in collecting clinical and administrative data needed to ensure complete and accurate assessments; (5) still other health care purchasers have chosen not to collect PPO data, believing that the broad access afforded consumers by these plans precludes the need for such an effort; (6) in addition, Georgia and accreditation agencies are now (or will be) requiring PPOs to demonstrate quality assurance activities, including a plan's ability to collect and analyze quality, performance, and satisfaction data; (7) information on whether a PPO has been certified or accredited is generally made available to the public; (8) unlike in the case of CalPERS, Medicare, and FEHBP, consumers will learn whether a health plan has met the state or accreditation agency standards, but they would not know how well the plan performs on specific quality-related measures, either on its own or in comparison with other plans; and (9) comparisons of plans on a range of performance indicators are expected to improve over time as more sophisticated measures become available.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.