Medicaid Managed Care

Challenges in Implementing Safeguards for Children With Special Needs Gao ID: HEHS-00-37 March 3, 2000

The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) and the states face significant challenges in implementing safeguards under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 for children with special needs who are mandatorily enrolled in capitated Medicaid managed care. Some states may have difficulty complying with the act and may have to expand their definitions of children with special needs to include all the act's categories. An additional challenge will be to assess whether and how to adapt generic safeguards for special needs populations to the unique needs of children. HCFA is making progress in tailoring its waiver review to require states to explicitly focus on children with special needs as a discrete population. HCFA recognizes that continued research and examination of the states' best practices can help it improve its waiver review criteria and provide technical assistance to states regarding the most useful safeguards.

GAO noted that: (1) the BBA definition of children with special needs does not cover some children in Medicaid whose health conditions could merit recognition as exceptional; (2) some children qualify for Medicaid because of high medical expenses but were not included in the BBA definition; (3) other children who qualify for Medicaid simply because of low income may also have disabilities or chronic conditions whose treatment in a managed care setting deserves to be more closely monitored; (4) even though the five categories used by the BBA include many children acknowledged as having special needs, those needs can vary considerably; (5) the lack of a homogeneous special needs population requires determining how best to apply certain safeguards, such as access to specialists and care coordination of the medical and social services delivered by various providers; (6) state Medicaid agencies often cannot readily identify some categories of children covered by the BBA definition and served by other programs such as title V and foster care; (7) improved coordination between state Medicaid agencies and other federal and state agencies that administer these programs would help resolve this problem; (8) nationwide data on the number of states with children with special needs in capitated managed care plans are available for only two of the five BBA categories of children with special needs--Supplemental Security Income and foster care; (9) HCFA is unable to determine the number of BBA-defined children with special needs who are enrolled in capitated Medicaid plans; (10) HCFA has not traditionally required separate identification or tracking of all of the BBA categories of children with special needs; (11) HCFA is taking steps to address these data limitations; (12) in June 1999, HCFA began applying mandatory interim criteria to review state waiver requests that require the enrollment of children with special needs in capitated managed care plans; (13) the interim criteria include some generic safeguards that emerged from these earlier efforts as well as some that are specific to children with special needs; (14) several safeguards HCFA identified in earlier efforts were not included in the interim criteria, which also did not specifically address the need to collect individual-level data to monitor the delivery of services or to adopt criteria for the approval of medical services that maintain rather than improve a person's functioning; and (15) HCFA has indicated the interim criteria will be revised to become more focused and rigorous as the agency learns more about best practices by states.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.