Medicaid
Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal Tax System Gao ID: GAO-08-17 November 14, 2007In fiscal year 2006, outlays for Medicaid were about $324 billion; about $185 billion was paid by the federal government. Because GAO previously identified abusive and criminal activity associated with government contractors owing billions of dollars in federal taxes, the subcommittee requested GAO expand our work to Medicaid providers. GAO was asked to (1) determine if Medicaid providers have unpaid federal taxes, and if so, the magnitude of such debts; (2) identify examples of Medicaid providers that have engaged in abusive or criminal activities; and (3) determine whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the states prevent health care providers with tax problems from enrolling in Medicaid or participating in the continuous levy program to pay federal tax debts. To perform this work, GAO analyzed tax data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Medicaid data from seven selected states based on magnitude of Medicaid payments and geography. GAO also performed additional investigative activities.
Over 30,000 Medicaid providers, about 5 percent of those paid in fiscal year 2006, had over $1 billion of unpaid federal taxes. These 30,000 providers were identified from a nonrepresentative selection of providers from seven states: California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas. This $1 billion estimate is likely understated because some Medicaid providers have understated their income or not filed their tax returns. We selected 25 Medicaid providers with high federal tax debt as case studies for more in-depth investigation of the extent and nature of abuse and criminal activity. For all 25 cases we found abusive and related criminal activity, including failure to remit individual income taxes or payroll taxes to IRS. Rather than fulfill their role as "trustees" of federal payroll tax funds and forward them to IRS, these providers diverted the money for other purposes. Willful failure to remit payroll taxes is a felony under U.S. law. Individuals associated with some of these providers diverted the payroll tax money for their own benefit or to help fund their businesses. Many of these individuals accumulated substantial assets, including million-dollar houses and luxury vehicles, while failing to pay their federal taxes. In addition, some case studies involved businesses that were sanctioned for substandard care of their patients. Despite their abusive and criminal activity, these 25 providers received Medicaid payments ranging from about $100,000 to about $39 million in fiscal year 2006. CMS and our selected states do not prevent health care providers who have federal tax debts from enrolling in Medicaid. CMS officials stated that such a requirement for screening potential providers for unpaid taxes could adversely impact states' ability to provide health care to low income people. Further, federal law generally prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer data to CMS and states. No tax debt owed by Medicaid providers has ever been collected through the continuous levy program. During our audit, IRS had not made a determination on whether Medicaid payments are considered "federal payments" and thus eligible for its continuous levy program. For fiscal year 2006, if an effective levy was in place for the seven selected states, GAO estimates that the federal government could have collected between $70 million and $160 million.
RecommendationsOur recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.
Director: Team: Phone:GAO-08-17, Medicaid: Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal Tax System
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-08-17
entitled 'Medicaid: Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal
Tax System' which was released on November 13, 2007.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Report to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate:
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
November 2007:
Medicaid:
Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal Tax System:
Tax Compliance:
GAO-08-17:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-08-17, a report to the Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs, U.S. Senate
Why GAO Did This Study:
In fiscal year 2006, outlays for Medicaid were about $324 billion;
about $185 billion was paid by the federal government. Because GAO
previously identified abusive and criminal activity associated with
government contractors owing billions of dollars in federal taxes, the
subcommittee requested GAO expand our work to Medicaid providers.
GAO was asked to (1) determine if Medicaid providers have unpaid
federal taxes, and if so, the magnitude of such debts; (2) identify
examples of Medicaid providers that have engaged in abusive or criminal
activities; and (3) determine whether the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) and the states prevent health care providers
with tax problems from enrolling in Medicaid or participating in the
continuous levy program to pay federal tax debts.
To perform this work, GAO analyzed tax data from the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) and Medicaid data from seven selected states based on
magnitude of Medicaid payments and geography. GAO also performed
additional investigative activities.
What GAO Found:
Over 30,000 Medicaid providers, about 5 percent of those paid in fiscal
year 2006, had over $1 billion of unpaid federal taxes. These 30,000
providers were identified from a nonrepresentative selection of
providers from seven states: California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland,
New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas. This $1 billion estimate is likely
understated because some Medicaid providers have understated their
income or not filed their tax returns.
We selected 25 Medicaid providers with high federal tax debt as case
studies for more in-depth investigation of the extent and nature of
abuse and criminal activity. For all 25 cases we found abusive and
related criminal activity, including failure to remit individual income
taxes or payroll taxes to IRS. Rather than fulfill their role as
’trustees“ of federal payroll tax funds and forward them to IRS, these
providers diverted the money for other purposes. Willful failure to
remit payroll taxes is a felony under U.S. law. Individuals associated
with some of these providers diverted the payroll tax money for their
own benefit or to help fund their businesses. Many of these individuals
accumulated substantial assets, including million-dollar houses and
luxury vehicles, while failing to pay their federal taxes. In addition,
some case studies involved businesses that were sanctioned for
substandard care of their patients. Despite their abusive and criminal
activity, these 25 providers received Medicaid payments ranging from
about $100,000 to about $39 million in fiscal year 2006.
Table: Examples of Medicaid Providers with Abusive and Criminal
Activity:
Type of business: Nursing home;
Unpaid tax debt: $2 million;
Fiscal year 2006 Medicaid payments: $6 million;
Description of activity: Owner fined for jeopardizing health and safety
of patients.
Type of business: Counselor;
Unpaid tax debt: $200,000;
Fiscal year 2006 Medicaid payments: $200,000;
Description of activity: Owner indicted for fraud for several hundred
thousands of dollars relating to a federal program.
Type of business: Ambulance service;
Unpaid tax debt: $300,000;
Fiscal year 2006 Medicaid payments: $300,000;
Description of activity: All business‘s assets were seized by a law
enforcements agency for money laundering.
Source: GAO analysis of IRS, CMS, public, and other records.
[End of table]
CMS and our selected states do not prevent health care providers who
have federal tax debts from enrolling in Medicaid. CMS officials stated
that such a requirement for screening potential providers for unpaid
taxes could adversely impact states' ability to provide health care to
low income people. Further, federal law generally prohibits the
disclosure of taxpayer data to CMS and states.
No tax debt owed by Medicaid providers has ever been collected through
the continuous levy program. During our audit, IRS had not made a
determination on whether Medicaid payments are considered ’federal
payments“ and thus eligible for its continuous levy program. For fiscal
year 2006, if an effective levy was in place for the seven selected
states, GAO estimates that the federal government could have collected
between $70 million and $160 million.
What GAO Recommends:
GAO is recommending that IRS conduct a study to determine whether
Medicaid payments can be incorporated in the continuous levy program
and evaluate 25 cases for additional collection action and criminal
investigation. IRS agreed with our recommendations.
To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on
[hyperlink, http://www.GAO-08-17]. For more information, contact Greg
Kutz at (202) 512-6722 or kutzg@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Contents:
Letter:
Results in Brief:
Background:
Magnitude of Unpaid Federal Taxes of Medicaid Providers:
Examples of Extent and Nature of Medicaid Providers' Abusive and
Potentially Criminal Activity Related to the Federal Tax System:
Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes Are Not Prohibited from Enrolling
or Receiving Payments from Medicaid:
Conclusions:
Recommendations for Executive Action:
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation:
Appendix I: Scope and Methodology:
Data Reliability Assessment:
Appendix II: Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
Appendix III: Comments from the Internal Revenue Service:
Appendix IV: Comments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services:
Appendix V: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
Tables:
Table 1: Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
Table 2: Additional Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
Figures:
Figure 1: Typical Medicaid Payment Process:
Figure 2: Medicaid Providers' Unpaid Taxes by Tax Type:
Figure 3: Unpaid Taxes of Medicaid Providers by Calendar Year:
Abbreviations:
CMS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
EIN: employer identification number:
FCTC: Federal Contractors Tax Compliance:
FMS Financial Management Service:
HHS: Department of Health and Human Services:
IRS: Internal Revenue Service:
SSN: Social Security number:
TFRP: trust fund recovery penalty:
TIN: taxpayer identification number:
TOP: Treasury Offset Program:
United States Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
November 14, 2007:
The Honorable Carl Levin:
Chairman:
The Honorable Norm Coleman:
Ranking Member:
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations:
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs:
United States Senate:
The success of our tax system hinges on the public's perception of its
fairness, including the extent to which taxpayers believe their
friends, neighbors, and businesses are complying with the tax laws and
are actually paying their taxes. The Internal Revenue Service's (IRS)
own data in this regard are not encouraging. IRS reported that the
federal government does not receive hundreds of billions of dollars in
taxes owed annually. IRS's most recent estimate is that the gross tax
gap (the difference between the taxes that should have been paid
voluntarily and on time and what was actually paid) was $345 billion
for tax year 2001. IRS estimated that it would eventually collect $55
billion of this amount, leaving a net tax gap of $290 billion in unpaid
taxes. IRS enforcement of the tax laws is vital to promote compliance
by giving taxpayers confidence that others are paying their fair share.
Because of the challenges that IRS faces in its enforcement of tax
laws, we continue to include it as a high-risk area for IRS.[Footnote
1]
A portion of the tax gap is owed by individuals and businesses
receiving payments from the federal government. For example, over the
past several years, we testified that federal contractors (Department
of Defense, federal civilian, and General Services Administration
contractors) abused the federal tax system with little
consequence.[Footnote 2] Due to the significance of the issues raised
during those hearings, you asked us to provide additional information
about whether Medicare and Medicaid providers were engaged in similar
tax abuses.[Footnote 3]
This is the second in a series of reports and testimonies to respond to
your request. In March 2007, we testified that Medicare physicians,
health professionals, and suppliers paid under the Supplemental Medical
Insurance program, also known as Medicare Part B, had abused the
federal tax system while doing business with the federal
government.[Footnote 4] This report will cover Medicaid health care
providers from seven selected states who also abused the federal tax
system.
The specific objectives of this forensic audit and related
investigation were, to the extent possible, (1) determine if providers
who receive Medicaid payments have unpaid federal taxes, and if so, the
magnitude of federal tax debts owed by these Medicaid providers; (2)
identify examples of providers engaged in abusive and criminal activity
related to the federal tax system; and (3) determine whether Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and selected states prevent
health care providers with tax problems from enrolling in Medicaid or
participate in the continuous levy program to pay federal tax debts.
To identify the extent to which Medicaid providers had unpaid federal
taxes, we obtained and analyzed fiscal year 2006 Medicaid payments made
to providers in a nonrepresentative selection of seven states:[Footnote
5] California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, and
Texas.[Footnote 6] Payments to these states constituted about 43
percent of all Medicaid payments made during fiscal year 2006. These
states were selected based on the magnitude of Medicaid payments and
geographical location. We also obtained and analyzed the IRS tax debt
data as of September 30, 2006. We matched the lists of Medicaid
providers with IRS tax debts using the taxpayer identification number
(TIN) to identify Medicaid providers with tax debts. To illustrate the
extent and nature of tax system abuse or potentially criminal activity,
we selected 25 Medicaid providers for a detailed audit and
investigation. The 25 providers were chosen based on the amount of
unpaid taxes, number of unpaid tax periods, amount of payments reported
by Medicaid, and indications that owner(s) might be involved in
multiple companies with tax debts. For these 25 Medicaid providers, we
reviewed copies of automated tax transcripts and other tax records (for
example, revenue officer's notes) and performed additional searches of
criminal, financial, health care, and public records.
To determine whether CMS and states prevent health care providers with
unpaid federal taxes from enrolling in Medicaid, we interviewed
officials from CMS and selected states and examined the CMS and
selected states' regulations, policies, and procedures for making
determinations in the enrollment approval process. We also interviewed
officials from CMS, IRS, and the Department of the Treasury's Financial
Management Service (FMS) concerning any barriers for levying Medicaid
payments. A more detailed description of the scope and methodology
related to our audit and investigative work supporting this report is
provided in appendix I.
We conducted our audit work from July 2006 through August 2007 in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted government auditing standards.
We performed our investigative work in accordance with standards
prescribed by the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency.
Results in Brief:
In seven selected states, thousands of Medicaid providers
abused[Footnote 7] the federal tax system with little or no
consequence. Specifically, our analysis of data provided by the
selected states and IRS indicates that over 30,000 Medicaid providers
from the selected states, over 5 percent, had tax debts totaling over
$1 billion as of September 30, 2006.[Footnote 8] The unpaid taxes
largely consisted of individual income and payroll taxes.[Footnote 9]
The $1 billion estimate of tax debts owed by Medicaid providers is
likely understated because IRS data do not reflect all amounts owed by
businesses and individuals. Specifically, these do not include amounts
owed by businesses and individuals that have not filed tax returns or
that have failed to report the full amount of taxes due (referred to as
nonfilers and underreporters) and for which IRS has not determined
which specific tax debts are owed.
Our audit and investigative work details the nature of abusive and
criminal activity related to the federal tax system by 25 Medicaid
providers. These 25 providers were paid by Medicaid for a variety of
services, including hospital, nursing facility, physician, and
ambulance services. Payments ranged from about $100,000 to
approximately $39 million during fiscal year 2006. Many were
established businesses that owed federal payroll taxes withheld for
their employees. Rather than fulfill their role as "trustees" of these
funds and forward them to IRS as required by law, these health care
providers diverted the money for other purposes. These payroll taxes
included amounts withheld from employee wages for Social Security,
Medicare, and individual income taxes.[Footnote 10]
At the same time that they were not paying their federal taxes, many
individuals associated with our 25 cases bought or owned significant
personal assets, including commercial properties, expensive homes, and
luxury vehicles. One business officer withdrew over $100,000 in cash at
casinos at the same time the business owed millions of dollars in
federal taxes. Further, another case study business was sanctioned by
its state regulator for substandard care of its patients.
CMS and the selected states do not prevent health care providers who
have tax debts from enrolling in or receiving payments from Medicaid.
CMS has not developed regulations to require states to (1) screen
health care providers for unpaid taxes and (2) obtain consent for IRS
disclosure of federal tax debts. CMS officials stated that the primary
focus of the Medicaid program, in partnership with the states, is to
provide health care services for low income people and not the
administration of taxes. CMS officials stated that such a requirement
could be a burden to the states in their enrollment of providers and
could adversely impact states' ability to provide health care to the
poor. Even if CMS did want to screen health care providers with tax
debts, federal law generally prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer data
to CMS and states.[Footnote 11] Thus, CMS and states do not have access
to tax data directly from IRS unless the taxpayer provides consent.
Consequently, CMS and the selected states have no mechanism or
requirement to prevent health care providers who have tax debts from
enrolling in or receiving payments from Medicaid.
A provision of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 authorizes IRS to
continuously levy certain federal payments made to delinquent
taxpayers. However, in the 10 years since its passage, IRS had not
determined whether Medicaid payments are considered federal payments,
and thus subject to the continuous levy program, or determined the
feasibility of incorporating these payments into the program. Thus, no
tax debt owed by Medicaid providers has ever been collected from
medicaid payments through the continuous levy program. If there had
been an effective levy program in place, we estimate that for fiscal
year 2006, the selected seven states could have levied payments for the
federal government and collected between $70 million to about $160
million of unpaid federal taxes. Officials from all seven of the
selected states stated that they have a continuous levy program to
offset Medicaid payments against their state debts.
Our report makes two recommendations to the IRS Commissioner. First, we
recommend that IRS conduct a study to determine whether Medicaid
payments can be incorporated in the continuous levy program. In
responding to a draft of our report, IRS agreed with our recommendation
but stated that it has already completed studies on whether the
Medicaid payments can be incorporated into the continuous levy program.
From those studies, IRS concluded that Medicaid disbursements do not
qualify as federal payments and therefore cannot be incorporated in the
continuous levy program. We modified our report accordingly. IRS agreed
with our second recommendation--to evaluate the 25 referred cases
detailed in this report for appropriate additional aggressive
collection action and criminal investigation as warranted. While we did
not make recommendations to either CMS or FMS, they provided technical
and other comments to the report. See the "Agency Comments and Our
Evaluation" section of this report for a more detailed discussion of
agency comments from IRS, CMS, and FMS. We have reprinted the IRS and
CMS written comments in appendixes III and IV.
Background:
Title XIX of the Social Security Act is a federal and state entitlement
program that pays for medical assistance for certain categories of low-
income adults and children. This program, known as Medicaid, became law
in 1965 and is jointly funded by the federal and state governments
(including the District of Columbia and the Territories). Medicaid is
the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services
for America's poorest people. More than 50 million persons enrolled in
the Medicaid program in fiscal year 2006. In fiscal year 2006,
according to CMS, total outlays for Medicaid (federal and state) were
approximately $324 billion, of which about $185 billion was paid by the
federal government.
Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state governments. The
federal government shares in a state's Medicaid service costs through a
matching formula. The federal matching rate for the cost of services
provided to Medicaid beneficiaries is related to a state's per capita
income and in federal fiscal year 2006 ranged from 50 percent to 76
percent.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
Although the federal government establishes general guidelines for the
Medicaid program, requirements are established by each state. CMS,
within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is
responsible for administering federal matching funds to the states and
for legislation and regulations affecting the Medicaid program. CMS
also provides guidelines, technical assistance, and periodic
assessments of state Medicaid programs.
State Medicaid Agencies:
Title XIX of the Social Security Act allows considerable flexibility
within the states' Medicaid plans. Within broad national guidelines
established by federal statutes, regulations, and policies, each state
(1) establishes its own eligibility standards; (2) determines the type,
amount, duration, and scope of services; (3) sets the rate of payment
for services; and (4) administers its own program--including enrollment
of providers. Medicaid policies for eligibility, services, and payment
are complex and vary considerably, even among states of similar size or
geographic proximity. Thus, a person who is eligible for Medicaid in
one state may not be eligible in another state, and the services
provided by one state may differ considerably in amount, duration, or
scope from services provided in a similar or neighboring state. In
addition, state legislatures may change Medicaid eligibility, services,
or reimbursement during the year.
To receive payment for services or goods provided to beneficiaries from
Medicaid, providers must first enroll in the Medicaid program. To
enroll, providers must submit a Medicaid enrollment application to the
state or their fiscal agents who are responsible for determining
whether the providers meet federal and state requirements for
enrollment. The state or its fiscal agents are responsible for
screening the applications based on CMS and state policies. Once an
applicant is deemed eligible by the state or its fiscal agents,
Medicaid providers can submit their claims to the state for payment.
The state is responsible for claims processing and verifying the claim
is accurate, complete, medically necessary, and covered under the
state's Medicaid plan. After the claim is approved, the state pays the
claim.
The typical Medicaid payment process is illustrated in figure 1. When a
Medicaid beneficiary receives care from a health care provider such as
a hospital, physician, or nursing home, the provider bills the state
Medicaid program for its services. The state in turn pays the provider
from a combination of state funds and federal funds, which have been
advanced by CMS each quarter. The state then files an expenditure
report, in which it claims the federal share of the Medicaid
expenditure as reimbursement for its payment to providers and
reconciles its total expenditures with the federal advance.[Footnote
12] In addition to reimbursement for medical services, the state may
claim federal reimbursement for functions it performs to administer its
Medicaid program, such as enrolling new beneficiaries; reviewing the
appropriateness of providers' claims; and collecting payments from
third parties, which are payers other than Medicaid, such as Medicare,
that may be liable for some or all of a particular health claim.
Figure 1: Typical Medicaid Payment Process:
This figure is an illustration showing a typical medicaid process. In
transaction 1, a Medicaid beneficiary receives care from a health care
provider, such as a physician; the provider bills the state Medicaid
program; and the state pays the provider by drawing on a pool of state
funds combined with a quarterly advance on federal matching funds. In
transaction 2, the state files an expenditure report, in which it
claims the federal Medicaid matching share as reimbursement for its
payments to providers and reconciles total quarterly expenditures with
the federal advance. States may file claims for medical services and
for administrative functions.
[See PDF for image]
Source: GAO, Art Explosion (clip art).
[End of figure]
[End of figure]
Magnitude of Unpaid Federal Taxes of Medicaid Providers:
Our analysis found that over 30,000 Medicaid providers at the selected
states had over $1 billion in unpaid federal taxes as of September 30,
2006.[Footnote 13] This represents over 5 percent of the approximately
560,000 Medicaid providers paid by the selected states during federal
fiscal year 2006. The amount of unpaid federal taxes we identified
among Medicaid providers is likely understated because (1) we
intentionally limited our scope to providers with agreed-to federal tax
debt for tax periods prior to 2006, and (2) the IRS taxpayer data
reflect only the amount of unpaid taxes either reported by the taxpayer
on a tax return or assessed by IRS through its various enforcement
programs and thus the unpaid tax debt amount does not include entities
for which IRS had not identified that they did not file tax returns or
underreported their income.
Characteristics of Medicaid Providers' Unpaid Federal Taxes:
As shown in figure 2, 87 percent of the approximately $1 billion in
unpaid taxes was comprised of individual income and payroll taxes. The
other 13 percent of taxes included corporate income, excise,
unemployment, and other types of taxes.
Figure 2: Medicaid Providers' Unpaid Taxes by Tax Type:
This figure is a pie chart showing medicaid providers' unpaid taxes by
tax type.
Payroll: 56%;
Individual income: 31%;
13%.
[See PDF for image]
Source: GAO analysis of Medicaid and IRS data as of September 30, 2006.
[End of figure]
As shown in figure 2, over half of the unpaid taxes owed by Medicaid
providers were payroll taxes. Employers are subject to civil and
criminal penalties if they do not remit payroll taxes to the federal
government. When an employer withholds taxes from an employee's wages,
the employer is deemed to have a responsibility to hold these amounts
"in trust" for the federal government until the employer makes a
federal tax deposit in that amount. To the extent these withheld
amounts are not forwarded to the federal government, the employer is
liable for these amounts, as well as the employer's matching Federal
Insurance Contribution Act contributions for Social Security and
Medicare. Individuals within the business (e.g., corporate officers)
may be held personally liable for the withheld amounts not forwarded
and they maybe assessed a civil monetary penalty known as a trust fund
recovery penalty (TFRP).[Footnote 14] Willful failure to remit payroll
taxes can also be a criminal felony offense punishable by imprisonment
up to 5 years, [Footnote 15] while the failure to properly segregate
payroll taxes can be a criminal misdemeanor offense punishable by
imprisonment of up to 1 year.[Footnote 16]
The law imposes no penalties upon an employee for the employer's
failure to remit payroll taxes since the employer is responsible for
submitting the amounts withheld. The Social Security and Medicare trust
funds are subsidized or made whole for unpaid payroll taxes by the
general fund. Thus, personal income taxes, corporate income taxes, and
other government revenues are used to pay for these shortfalls to the
Social Security and Medicare trust funds.
A substantial amount of the unpaid federal taxes shown in IRS records
as owed by Medicaid providers had been outstanding for several years.
As reflected in figure 3, about 56 percent of the $1 billion in unpaid
taxes was for tax periods from calendar year 2000 through calendar year
2004, and approximately 29 percent of the unpaid taxes was for tax
periods prior to calendar year 2000. [Footnote 17]
Figure 3: Unpaid Taxes of Medicaid Providers by Calendar Year:
This figure is a pie chart showing unpaid taxed of medicaid providers
by calendar year.
2000-2004: 56%;
Prior to 2000: 29%;
2005: 15%.
[See PDF for image]
Source: GAO analysis of Medicaid and IRS data as of September 30, 2006.
[End of figure]
Our previous work has shown that as unpaid taxes age, the likelihood of
collecting all or a portion of the amount owed decreases.[Footnote 18]
This is due, in part, to the continued accrual of interest and
penalties on the outstanding tax debt, which, over time, can dwarf the
original tax obligation. The amount of unpaid federal taxes reported
above does not include all tax debts owed by Medicaid providers due to
statutory provisions that give IRS a finite period under which it can
seek to collect on unpaid taxes. There is a 10-year statute of
limitations beyond which IRS is prohibited from attempting to collect
tax debt.[Footnote 19] Consequently, if the Medicaid providers owe
federal taxes beyond the 10-year statutory collection period, the older
tax debt may have been removed from IRS's records. We were unable to
determine the amount of tax debt that had been removed.
Unpaid Federal Taxes of Medicaid Providers Is Understated:
Although over $1 billion in unpaid federal taxes owed by Medicaid
providers as of September 30, 2006, is a significant amount, it likely
understates the full extent of unpaid taxes owed by these or other
businesses and individuals. The IRS tax database reflects only the
amount of unpaid federal taxes either reported by the individual or
business on a tax return or assessed by IRS through its various
enforcement programs. The IRS database does not reflect amounts owed by
businesses and individuals that have not filed tax returns and for
which IRS has not assessed tax amounts due. For example, during our
audit, we identified instances from our case studies in which Medicaid
providers failed to file tax returns for a particular tax period and
IRS had not assessed taxes for these tax periods.[Footnote 20]
Consequently, while these providers had unpaid federal taxes, they were
listed in IRS records as having no unpaid taxes for that period.
Further, our analysis did not attempt to account for businesses or
individuals that purposely underreported income and were not
specifically identified by IRS as owing the additional federal taxes.
According to IRS, underreporting of income accounted for more than 80
percent of the estimated $345 billion annual gross tax gap.[Footnote
21]
Finally, our analysis did not attempt to identify Medicaid providers
who owed taxes under a separate TIN from the TIN that received the
Medicaid payments. For example, sole proprietors and certain limited
liability companies may file Medicaid claims under their Social
Security numbers (SSN). If these Medicaid providers had employees, they
would typically report the payroll taxes under an employer
identification number (EIN) and not their SSNs. Consequently, the full
extent of unpaid federal taxes for Medicaid providers is not known.
In addition to the IRS tax database not reflecting all assessed tax
amounts due, our past audits[Footnote 22] have also found that the IRS
tax database contains coding errors that adversely affect IRS's
collection activities. IRS's collection process is heavily dependent
upon its automated computer system and the information that resides
within this system. In particular, the codes in each taxpayer's account
in IRS's tax database are critical to IRS in tracking the collection
actions it has taken against a tax debtor and in determining what, if
any, additional collection actions should be pursued. For example, IRS
uses these codes to identify cases it should exclude from the
continuous levy program,[Footnote 23] which is an automated method of
collecting tax debt by offsetting certain federal payments made to
individuals and businesses, as well as cases it should exclude from
other collection actions.
Examples of Extent and Nature of Medicaid Providers' Abusive and
Potentially Criminal Activity Related to the Federal Tax System:
For all 25 cases that we audited and investigated, we confirmed that
their activities were abusive and in many instances found criminal
activity related to the federal tax system. Of these cases, 17 involved
businesses with employees who had unpaid payroll taxes, most dating as
far back as the late 1990s. However, rather than fulfill their role as
"trustees" of this money and forward it to IRS, these Medicaid
providers diverted the money for other purposes, including their own
salaries. As stated earlier, willful failure to remit payroll taxes can
be a criminal felony offense punishable by imprisonment up to 5
years,[Footnote 24] while the failure to properly segregate payroll
taxes can be a criminal misdemeanor offense punishable by imprisonment
of up to 1 year.[Footnote 25]
Table 1 highlights 10 cases of businesses and individuals with unpaid
taxes. Our investigations revealed that, despite their businesses owing
substantial amounts of taxes to IRS, some owners had substantial
personal assets--including expensive homes and luxury cars. We are
referring the 25 cases detailed in our report to IRS for appropriate
collection action and criminal investigation.
Table 1: Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
Case: 1;
Nature of work: Hospital;
Medicaid payments[A]: $9 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $5 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily composed of unpaid payroll taxes
beginning in the late 1990s;
* IRS reported tax debts to the continuous levy program for collection
action;
* IRS proposed an injunction to close the business in a recent year
because the business continued to accumulate tax debt;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against business owners;
* IRS attempted to levy a bank account but the owner closed the account
prior to the levy;
* Business owners had several large cash transactions in recent years;
* Owners own two residences worth over $2 million;
* IRS and the state filed tax liens against the business;
* Business received over $2 million dollars in Medicare payments in a
recent year.
Case: 2;
Nature of work: Nursing home;
Medicaid payments[A]: $6 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $2 million;
Comments:
* Business's federal tax debts are primarily composed of unpaid payroll
taxes;
* Business received nearly $2 million in Medicare payments in a recent
year;
* IRS reported tax debts to the continuous levy program for collection
action;
* Business charged with patient abuse, and business and business owner
also fined and suspended for jeopardizing the health and safety of
patients;
* IRS filed tax liens against the business and business owner;
* Related business owes over $1 million of unpaid taxes that have been
referred to the continuous levy program.
Case: 3;
Nature of work: Nursing facility;
Medicaid payments[A]: $3 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $3 million;
Comments:
* Business's federal tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business officer owns multiple properties; one worth over $1 million;
* IRS assessed over a $1 million TFRP against the business officer;
* Business defaulted on an installment agreement with IRS;
* Business received nearly $3 million in Medicare payments in a recent
year;
* IRS reported business's tax debts to the continuous levy program;
* Business is involved in a lawsuit for malpractice in a recent year;
* Business officers filed for bankruptcy in early 2000s;
* IRS filed tax liens against the business;
* Business officer owns a related business that owes over $200,000 in
unpaid federal taxes. IRS reported the related business' tax debts to
the continuous levy program.
Case: 4;
Nature of work: Pharmacy;
Medicaid payments[A]: $100,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $800,000;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes covering over
7 years. For most of these tax periods, the business filed late and
made no tax payments;
* Business filed for bankruptcy in the mid-2000s;
* Business officer sold assets of the business even though the officer
knew the business owed unpaid taxes and also knew that liens were
filed;
* IRS assessed a nearly $3 million TFRP against the business officer;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business;
* Business officer owns a related business that owes unpaid federal
taxes.
Case: 5;
Nature of work: Home health services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $2 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $1 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business filed for bankruptcy while a business officer continued to
earn over $250,000 a year;
* Business officer owns a luxury vehicle and property worth about $1
million located near a golf course;
* Business received over $1 million in Medicare payments in a recent
year;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against a business officer;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 6;
Nature of work: Dental;
Medicaid payments[A]: $200,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $300,000;
Comments:
* Dentist's tax debts are primarily unpaid income taxes;
* Dentist generally had not made any federal tax payments since early
1990s;
* In a recent year, dentist earned over $300,000 and did not file an
income tax return;
* Dentist owes debts to other federal agencies, including delinquent
student loan debt;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the dentist.
Case: 7;
Nature of work: Home care;
Medicaid payments[A]: $2 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $3 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes beginning in
the late 1990s;
* Business did not file tax returns in late 1990s and early 2000s;
* Business owners own multiple real properties, including a million
dollar residence, luxury vehicles, and a recreational boat;
* IRS assessed over $1 million TFRP against one business owner;
* Business filed bankruptcy in a recent year;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business;
* Business owners own several related health care businesses which are
in bankruptcy status.
Case: 8;
Nature of work: Clinic;
Medicaid payments[A]: $3 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $1 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business owner borrowed over $2 million from the business while
business owed payroll taxes;
* Business owner owns residential property worth nearly $4 million
dollars, several luxury vehicles, and a recreational boat;
* Business did not file required tax return in a recent year;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against owner;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 9;
Nature of work: Nursing home facilities;
Medicaid payments[A]: $39 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $16 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debt is primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business fined for quality of care violations in early 2000s;
* Business officer withdrew over $100,000 in cash at casinos at the
same time he was not paying the nursing home's taxes;
* Multimillion-dollar IRS and state tax liens filed against the
business.
Case: 10;
Nature of work: Professional counselor;
Medicaid payments[A]: $200,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $200,000;
Comments:
* Owner's tax debt is primarily individual income taxes;
* Owner and spouse currently under investigation for mail fraud;
* Owner has a felony conviction;
* Owner indicted for fraud for several hundred thousand dollars
relating to a federal program;
* IRS filed tax liens against the owners.
Source: GAO analysis of IRS, FMS, Medicaid claims, public, and other
records.
Notes: Dollar amounts are rounded. The nature of unpaid taxes for
businesses was primarily due to unpaid payroll taxes. A Medicaid
provider can submit claims using either an EIN or SSN. In our report,
any provider submitting a claim with an EIN is referred to as a
business, and any provider submitting a claim with an SSN is referred
to as an individual.
[A] Medicaid payments are Medicaid claims paid by states for fiscal
year 2006 (October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006).
[B] Unpaid tax amount was as of September 30, 2006.
[End of table]
The following provides illustrative detailed information on four cases
we audited and investigated.
* Case 1: During the time the owners of the hospital owed over $5
million in payroll taxes, the owners purchased a vacation home worth
about $1 million. IRS assessed a trust fund recovery penalty (TFRP) of
nearly $2 million against the owners, filed federal tax liens totaling
nearly $8 million against the owners and hospital, attempted to levy
the owners' bank accounts, and proposed an injunction to close the
hospital because the business continued to accumulate tax debt. The
hospital received over $9 million in Medicaid payments during fiscal
year 2006.
* Case 2: While owing over $2 million in unpaid payroll taxes, the
nursing home owner and business were fined for jeopardizing the health
and safety of their patients. The nursing home owner attempted to sell
the business and other real estate property and promised to pay tax
debts in full. However, the owner did not sell the business or real
estate and took other actions to avoid federal tax liens. IRS fined the
owner over $400,000 in a recent year for intentionally disregarding
IRS's tax reporting and filing requirements. The owner also has a
related business that owes over $1 million in unpaid taxes. The nursing
home received over $6 million in Medicaid payments during fiscal year
2006.
* Case 4: The managing officer of a pharmacy sold off business assets
without notifying IRS while knowing that the business owed over
$800,000 in unpaid payroll taxes over 7 years. In an attempt to collect
unpaid debts from the officer, IRS assessed a TFRP of nearly $3 million
and filed federal tax liens against the officer and the business. The
officer owns a related entity that also owes a large amount of taxes,
and recently started up a new corporation using the same address as the
pharmacy. The pharmacy received nearly $100,000 in Medicaid payments
during fiscal year 2006.
* Case 8: A medical clinic owner owns a house worth nearly $4 million,
several luxury vehicles, and a pleasure boat while owing taxes. The
owner also borrowed over $2 million from the business and sold
properties for about $1 million at the same time the business owed over
$1 million in unpaid payroll taxes. In addition, IRS generated a tax
return for the business in a recent year because the business owner did
not file it. The medical clinic received over $2 million in Medicaid
payments during fiscal year 2006.
In addition to the 25 cases that we identified through IRS tax records,
we separately also found a Medicaid provider that was recently
convicted for failure to pay employment taxes owed by several nursing
homes.[Footnote 26] The nursing home businesses received over $25
million in Medicaid payments during fiscal year 2006. According to
court documents, the nursing homes owed over $14 million in unpaid
taxes. At the same time the businesses owed taxes, the owner bought a
10,000 square foot house with a current estimated value of over $2
million. The court records indicate that the owner spent tens of
thousands of dollars furnishing the house including crystal
chandeliers, a 132-piece set of Haviland Bavarian porcelain china, and
oriental rugs. The owner used company funds to pay personal expenses
such as a housekeeper, children's nanny, monthly pension for a parent
who never worked at the company, a sailboat, and jet-skis. While owing
taxes, the owner also went on vacations to Hawaii and gambling trips to
Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada. Court records also indicate that while in
Hawaii, the owner bought a $16,000 Rolex watch, the day before one of
the required federal tax deposits was due.
Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes Are Not Prohibited from Enrolling
or Receiving Payments from Medicaid:
CMS and the selected states do not prevent health care providers who
have tax debts from enrolling in or receiving payments from Medicaid.
CMS has not developed regulations to require states to (1) screen
health care providers for unpaid taxes and (2) obtain consent for IRS
disclosure of federal tax debts. CMS officials stated that the primary
focus of the Medicaid program is to provide health care services for
low income people and not the administration of taxes. Further, federal
law generally prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer data to CMS and
states and thus, CMS and states do not have access to tax data directly
from IRS unless the taxpayer provides consent.[Footnote 27] Further,
none of the seven states we contacted have ever implemented a
continuous federal tax levy for Medicaid payments. Thus, Medicaid
payments to providers that owe federal taxes are not being continuously
levied.
Screening for Unpaid Taxes:
Federal law does not prohibit providers with unpaid federal taxes from
enrolling in and billing Medicaid. Federal regulations and policies
require the states, as part of their responsibilities for determining
whether the providers meet Medicaid requirements for enrollment, to
verify basic information on potential providers, including whether the
providers meet state licensure requirements and whether the providers
are prohibited from participating in federal health care programs.
However, federal regulations and policies do not require the states to
screen these providers for federal tax delinquency nor do they
explicitly authorize the states to reject the providers that have
delinquent tax debt from participation in Medicaid. CMS officials
stated that the primary focus of the Medicaid program is to provide
health care services for low income people and not the administration
of taxes. CMS officials stated that such a requirement could be a
burden to the states in their enrollment of providers and could
adversely impact states' ability to provide health care to the poor.
Consequently, the selected states' processes generally do not consider
federal tax debts of prospective providers in the Medicaid enrollment
process.[Footnote 28]
Further, due to a statutory restriction on disclosure of taxpayer
information, even if tax debts specifically were to be considered in
enrollment in Medicaid, no coordinated or independent mechanism exists
for the states to obtain complete information on providers that have
unpaid tax debt. Federal law does not permit IRS to disclose taxpayer
information, including tax debts, to CMS or Medicaid state officials
unless the taxpayer consents, which neither CMS nor the states
currently seek.[Footnote 29] Thus, certain tax debt information can
only be discovered from public records if IRS files a federal tax lien
against the property of a tax debtor or if a record of conviction for
tax offense is publicly available.[Footnote 30] Consequently, CMS and
state officials do not have ready access to information on unpaid tax
debts to consider in making decisions on Medicaid providers.
Medicaid Payments to Providers Are Not Subject to IRS Continuous Levy:
Although a provision of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 authorizes IRS
to continuously levy certain federal payments made to delinquent
taxpayers, no tax debt owed by Medicaid providers has ever been
collected using this provision of the law.[Footnote 31] In the 10 years
since its passage, IRS had not determined whether Medicaid payments are
federal payments and thus subject to the continuous levy program or
determined the feasibility of incorporating these payments into the
program.[Footnote 32]
If there had been an effective levy program in place, we estimate that
the selected states could have levied payments for the federal
government and collected between $70 million to about $160 million of
unpaid federal taxes during fiscal year 2006.[Footnote 33] This
estimate was based on those debts that IRS reported to the Treasury
Offset Program (TOP) as of September 30, 2006. Officials from all these
selected states stated that they have a continuous levy program to
offset Medicaid payments against their state debts.
Conclusions:
Available data indicate that the vast majority of Medicaid providers
appear to pay their federal taxes. However, our work has shown that
over 30,000 Medicaid providers have taken advantage of the opportunity
to avoid paying their federal taxes. While Medicaid providers are
relied on to deliver significant medical services to those most in
need, they must also pay their fair share of federal taxes. Many of the
individuals involved in our cases have consistently not paid their
taxes yet have received millions of dollars in Medicaid payments and
have faced no criminal consequences. At the same time, some of these
individuals are living lives of luxury, financed in part by Medicare
and Medicaid payments. Also, IRS has taken little action to explore the
continuous levy of Medicaid payments, which over time potentially could
have resulted in millions of dollars of collections or to aggressively
pursue collection and criminal investigation of the individuals
involved in our 25 case studies.
Recommendations for Executive Action:
We recommend that the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service take
the following two actions:
* Conduct a study to determine whether Medicaid payments can be
incorporated in the continuous levy program.
* Evaluate the 25 referred cases detailed in this report for
appropriate additional aggressive collection action and criminal
investigation as warranted.
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation:
We received written comments on a draft of this report from the Acting
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (see app. III) and Acting
Administrator of CMS (see app. IV). We also received an e-mail response
from FMS.
IRS concurred with our recommendations. In response to our
recommendation that IRS conduct a study to determine whether Medicaid
payments can be incorporated in the continuous levy program, IRS stated
that both a subgroup of the Federal Contractors Tax Compliance (FCTC)
task force and IRS General Counsel have completed an independent study
on whether the Medicaid payments can be incorporated into the
continuous levy program. Both the FCTC task force and IRS General
Counsel concluded that Medicaid disbursements do not qualify as federal
payments and therefore cannot be incorporated in the continuous levy
program.
In response to a draft of our report, CMS expressed concern about the
tone and language we used to discuss our findings. Specifically, CMS
interpreted our finding that over 30,000 Medicaid providers had over $1
billion of unpaid federal taxes as implying that "there is some direct
correlation between owing taxes and being a Medicaid provider." Our
report clearly states that the vast majority of Medicaid providers are
paying their taxes. For the 5 percent of Medicaid providers with tax
debt, we simply reported on the facts of what we found, which do not
require additional evaluation to satisfactorily address our objective.
Furthermore, regarding our third objective, CMS interpreted our report
as implying that there is an underlying connection between the activity
(preventing providers with tax problems from participating in the
Medicaid program) and the authority and responsibility to perform such
activity. Again, it appears that CMS misinterpreted our findings. We
specifically stated that federal law does not prohibit providers with
unpaid taxes from enrolling in and billing Medicaid. Although CMS is
not required to screen potential providers for tax debts, we are
concerned that CMS stated it would be inappropriate to prevent medical
providers that owe federal taxes participating in the Medicaid program-
-which would presumably include those egregious cases we identified in
this report. We believe that any CMS action to prevent medical
providers who refuse to pay their taxes from participating in the
Medicaid program would help ensure the integrity of the Medicaid
program and does not necessarily conflict with CMS's role in providing
health care to low-income individuals.
Both CMS and FMS expressed concern with their agencies involvement in
the continuous levy program. CMS stated that we implied that CMS and
the Medicaid agencies should be conducting the continuous levy on these
payments. FMS stated that our report indicated that, because Medicaid
payments include funds the states receive from the federal government,
the Medicaid payment is a federal payment. Our report did not state
that CMS and the Medicaid agencies should be conducting the continuous
levy on Medicaid payments nor did we state that Medicaid payments are
federal payments. However, we did report that IRS had not determined
whether Medicaid payments are federal payments and recommended that IRS
conduct a study to determine whether Medicaid payments can be
incorporated in the continuous levy program.
CMS and FMS also provided us technical corrections to the report which
we incorporated, as appropriate.
As agreed with your office, unless you publicly release its contents
earlier we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days
from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies of this
report to the Secretary of the Treasury, the Commissioner of the
Financial Management Service (FMS), the Acting Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, the Acting Administrator of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) and interested congressional committees.
The report is also available at no charge on the GAO Web site at
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. If you have any questions concerning
this report, please contact Gregory D. Kutz at (202) 512-6722 or
kutzg@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional
Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this
report.
Signed by:
Gregory D. Kutz:
Managing Director:
Forensic Audits and Special Investigations:
[End of section]
Appendix I: Scope and Methodology:
To identify the magnitude of unpaid federal taxes owed by Medicaid
providers, we used a nonrepresentative selection of states. We selected
the states of California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New York,
Pennsylvania, and Texas based on the magnitude of payments made to
Medicaid providers and the geographical location of those states. We
obtained and analyzed Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax debt data as
of September 30, 2006. We also obtained and analyzed the selected
states' federal fiscal year 2006 approved Medicaid payments to
providers. We matched the Medicaid payment data to the IRS unpaid
assessment data using the taxpayer identification number (TIN) field.
To avoid overestimating the amount owed by Medicaid providers with
unpaid tax debts and to capture only significant tax debts, we excluded
from our analysis tax debts and paid claims meeting specific criteria
to establish a minimum threshold for the amount of tax debt and for the
amount of paid claims to be considered when determining whether a tax
debt was significant. The criteria we used to exclude tax debts are as
follows:
* tax debts that IRS classified as compliance assessments or memo
accounts for financial reporting,[Footnote 34]
* tax debts from calendar year 2006 tax periods, and:
* Medicaid providers with total unpaid taxes and Medicaid paid claims
of less than $100.
These criteria were used to exclude tax debts that might be under
dispute or generally duplicative or invalid, and tax debts that were
recently incurred. Specifically, compliance assessments or memo
accounts were excluded because these taxes have neither been agreed to
by the taxpayers nor affirmed by the court, or these taxes could be
invalid or duplicative of other taxes already reported. We excluded tax
debts from calendar year 2006 tax periods to eliminate tax debt that
may involve matters that are routinely resolved between the taxpayer
and IRS, with the taxes paid or abated within a short period. We
further excluded tax debts and Medicaid-paid claims of less than $100
because they are insignificant for the purpose of determining the
extent of taxes owed by Medicaid providers. Our analysis also did not
attempt to identify Medicaid providers who owed taxes under a separate
TIN from the TIN under which the Medicaid payments were received. As a
result, the full extent of unpaid federal taxes for Medicaid providers
is understated.
To identify indications of abuse or potentially criminal activity, we
selected 25 Medicaid providers for a detailed audit and investigation.
The 25 providers were chosen using a nonrepresentative selection
approach based on our judgment, data mining, and a number of other
criteria. Specifically, we narrowed down providers to 25 with unpaid
taxes based on the amount of unpaid taxes, number of unpaid tax
periods, amount of payments reported by Medicaid, and indications that
owner(s) might be involved in multiple companies with tax debts. For
these 25 cases, we obtained copies of automated tax transcripts and
other tax records (for example, revenue officer's notes) from IRS and
performed additional searches of criminal, financial, and public
records. In cases where record searches and IRS tax transcripts
indicated that the owners or officers of a business were involved in
other related entities[Footnote 35] that have unpaid federal taxes, we
also reviewed the related entities and the owner(s) or officer(s), in
addition to the original business we identified. In instances where we
identified related parties that had both Medicaid payments and tax
debts, our case studies included those related entities, combining
unpaid taxes and combined Medicaid payments for the original
individual/business as well as all related entities. Because our
investigations were generally limited to publicly available
information, our audit of the 25 cases may not have identified all
related parties or all significant assets (i.e., personal bank data,
companies established to hide assets) that the Medicaid providers own.
To determine the extent to which Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) officials and the states are required to consider tax
debts or other criminal activities in the enrollment of providers into
Medicaid, we examined CMS policies and procedures, Medicaid
regulations, and the selected policies for enrollment. We also
discussed policies and procedures used to enroll providers into
Medicaid with officials from the selected states. As part of these
discussions, we inquired whether the selected states specifically
consider tax debts or perform background investigations to determine
whether a prospective provider is qualified before the enrollment to
Medicaid is granted. To determine the extent to which Medicaid payments
to providers are continuously levied to pay tax debts, we examined the
statutory and regulatory authorities that govern the continuous levy
program and interviewed officials from CMS, IRS, and Department of the
Treasury's Financial Management Service (FMS) to determine whether any
legal barriers existed.
To determine the potential levy collections on Medicaid payments during
fiscal year 2006, we used 15 percent and 100 percent of the total paid
claim or total tax debt amount reported to the Treasury Offset Program
(TOP), whichever was less. A gap will exist between what could be
collected and the maximum levy amount calculated because (1) tax debts
in TOP may not be eligible for immediate levy because IRS has not
completed due process notifications and (2) tax debts may become
ineligible for levy because of a change in collection status (e.g., tax
debtor filed for bankruptcy).
We conducted our audit work from July 2006 through August 2007 in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted government auditing standards,
and we performed our investigative work in accordance with standards
prescribed by the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency.
Data Reliability Assessment:
To determine the reliability of the IRS unpaid assessments data, we
relied on the work we performed during our annual audits of IRS's
financial statements. While our financial statement audits have
identified some data reliability problems associated with the coding of
some of the fields in IRS's tax records, including errors and delays in
recording taxpayer information and payments, we determined that the
data were sufficiently reliable to address this report's objectives.
Our financial audit procedures, including the reconciliation of the
value of unpaid taxes recorded in IRS's masterfile to IRS's general
ledger, identified no material differences.
For the selected states' Medicaid payment databases and FMS's TOP
databases, we interviewed the selected states' and FMS officials
responsible for their respective databases. In addition, we performed
electronic testing of specific data elements in the databases that we
used to perform our work. On the basis of our discussions with agency
officials, review of agency documents, and our own testing, we
concluded that the data elements used for this testimony were
sufficiently reliable for our purposes.
[End of section]
Appendix II Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
This appendix presents summary information on the abusive or
potentially criminal activity associated with 15 of our 25 case
studies. Table 2 shows the remaining case studies that we audited and
investigated. As with the 10 cases discussed in the body of this
report, we also found substantial abuse and potentially criminal
activity related to the federal tax system during our review of these
15 Medicaid providers that also received Medicaid payments in federal
fiscal year 2006. The case studies involving businesses primarily
involved unpaid payroll taxes.
Table 2: Additional Medicaid Providers with Unpaid Federal Taxes:
Case: 11;
Nature of work: Physician;
Medicaid payments[A]: $100,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $300,000;
Comments:
* Physician's tax debt is primarily individual income taxes;
* Physician owns several luxury cars;
* Physician defaulted on an installment agreement with IRS;
* Physician did not file income tax returns in recent years;
* Physician received tens of thousands of dollars from Medicare in a
recent year;
* IRS filed tax liens against the physician.
Case: 12;
Nature of work: Hospital;
Medicaid payments[A]: $13 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $7 million;
Comments:
* Hospital's tax debts are primarily composed of unpaid payroll taxes
dating back to the late 1990s;
* IRS reported tax debts to continuous levy program;
* Hospital received tens of millions of dollars in Medicare payments in
a recent year;
* IRS assessed trust fund recovery penalty (TFRP) against the business
officer;
* Business officer admitted hiding money from creditors in a recent
year;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the hospital.
Case: 13;
Nature of work: Medical center;
Medicaid payments[A]: $1 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $1 million;
Comments:
* Business's tax debts are primarily composed of unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business officer owns over $1 million property and a luxury vehicle;
* IRS reported related business tax debts to the continuous levy
program;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business;
* Business received over $300,000 in Medicare payments in a recent
year.
Case: 14;
Nature of work: Physician;
Medicaid payments[A]: $100,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $300,000;
Comments:
* Physician's tax debts are primarily unpaid individual income taxes;
* Physician has made little, and in some instances no, federal tax
payments to IRS since the late 1990s;
* Physician claimed limited ability to pay taxes. However, physician
owns a residential property worth over $1 million and also received
tens of thousands of dollars from Medicare in a recent year;
* Physician owes debts to another federal agency;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the physician.
Case: 15;
Nature of work: Physician;
Medicaid payments[A]: $200,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $200,000;
Comments:
* Physician's tax debts are primarily unpaid individual income taxes
dating back to early 2000s;
* Physician is being sued for malpractice;
* IRS filed tax liens against the physician;
* IRS reported tax debts to continuous levy program.
Case: 16;
Nature of work: Business services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $600,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $500,000;
Comments:
* Business tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* IRS rejected the business owner's offer to pay about 10 percent to
settle the tax debt due to the owner's ability to pay more;
* Business owner has an egregious history of not paying taxes;
* Business owner filed late returns and did not make any payroll tax
payment for over 5 years;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against the business owner;
* Business owner was recently assessed a TFRP for another related
business.
Case: 17;
Nature of work: Ambulance services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $700,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $400,000;
Comments:
* Owner's tax debts are primarily unpaid individual income taxes for
every year for a decade;
* Business owner has made no effort to pay taxes owed;
* Owner made several large cash transactions in recent years;
* Business owner has multiple real estate properties, including several
investment properties.
Case: 18;
Nature of work: Dental;
Medicaid payments[A]: $200,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $400,000;
Comments:
* Dentist's tax debts are primarily unpaid individual income taxes
dating back to the late 1990s;
* Dentist did not file tax returns in the early 2000s;
* Dentist owes delinquent student loans;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 19;
Nature of work: Medical equipment and supplies;
Medicaid payments[A]: $300,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $500,000;
Comments:
* Business tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes dating back to
the late 1990s;
* Business officer owns a luxury vehicle;
* IRS reported tax debts to continuous levy program;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 20;
Nature of work: Transportation services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $900,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $2 million;
Comments:
* Business officers own multiple real estate properties, including a
residential property worth about $1 million and two multimillion-dollar
commercial properties;
* Received over $3 million in Medicare payments in a recent year;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against the owner;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 21;
Nature of work: Dental;
Medicaid payments[A]: $200,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $200,000;
Comments:
* Dentist's tax debts are primarily unpaid individual income taxes
dating back to the mid-1990s;
* Dentist convicted of tax evasion.
Case: 22;
Nature of work: Family services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $500,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $3 million;
Comments:
* Business tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* IRS assessed TFRP against business officers;
* Business earned over $3 million in a recent year;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 23;
Nature of work: Nursing services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $1 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $2 million;
Comments:
* Business tax debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business earned over $1 million in a recent year;
* IRS reported business as being in defunct status;
* IRS reported tax debts to continuous levy program;
* IRS filed tax liens against the business.
Case: 24;
Nature of work: Ambulance services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $300,000;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $300,000;
Comments:
* Business tax debts are primarily payroll taxes;
* All business's assets were seized by law enforcement agency for money
laundering;
* Business in defunct status in a recent year;
* Business received over $2 million in Medicare payments in the year
prior to being defunct;
* Owner arrested for cocaine possession;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against the owner.
Case: 25;
Nature of work: Home health services;
Medicaid payments[A]: $4 million;
Unpaid federal tax[B]: $900,000;
Comments:
* Business debts are primarily unpaid payroll taxes;
* Business officer owns a luxury vehicle;
* IRS assessed a TFRP against the business officers;
* IRS and state filed tax liens against the business.
Source: GAO analysis of IRS, FMS, Medicaid claims, public, and other
records.
Notes: Dollar amounts are rounded. The nature of unpaid taxes for
businesses was primarily due to unpaid payroll taxes. A Medicaid
provider can submit claims using either an Employer Identification
Number (EIN) or Social Security Number (SSN). In our report, any
provider submitting a claim with an EIN is referred to as a business,
and any provider submitting a claim with an SSN is referred to as an
individual.
[A] Medicaid payments are Medicaid claims paid by states for fiscal
year 2006 (October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006).
[B] Unpaid tax amount was as of September 30, 2006.
[End of table]
[End of section]
Appendix III: Comments from the Internal Revenue Service:
Department Of The Treasury:
Internal Revenue Service:
Washington, D.C. 20224:
Commissioner:
September 21, 2007:
Mr. Gregory Kutz:
Managing Director:
Forensic Audits and Special Investigations:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street, N.W.:
Washington, DC 20548:
Dear Mr. Kutz:
I have reviewed the draft Government Accountability Office (GAO) report
titled: "Medicaid: Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal
Tax System" (GAO-08-17) and agree with the recommendations. Your report
acknowledges the complexity of Medicaid's policies for eligibility,
services and payments.
The IRS recognizes the importance and benefits of using the Federal
Payment Levy Program (FPLP) as a mechanism to collect delinquent taxes
by levying numerous other categories of federal payments disbursed or
administered through Financial Management Services (FMS). During Fiscal
Year (FY) 2006 alone, we collected $299 million through FPLP as
compared to $197 million in FY 2005. Through July 2007, we collected
$286 million.
We are currently working with FMS and the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) as part of a subgroup of the Federal
Contractors Tax Compliance (FCTC) task force. We are exploring two
options to systemically levy all CMS Medicare payments. The first
option is to utilize the process for levying Department of Defense
payments, known as the Non Treasury Disbursed Office process. The
second option proposes to have FMS take on the disbursement process of
the CMS contractors in the Healthcare Integrated General Ledger
Accounting System, known as the Treasury Disbursed Office process.
The FCTC subgroup has also considered the feasibility of incorporating
into the FPLP disbursements made to medical providers under the
Medicaid program. The FCTC subgroup analysis concluded that Medicaid
disbursements flowing from the federal government to state Medicaid
agencies do not qualify as federal payments for the purpose of
continuous levy under section 6331(h) of the Internal Revenue Code. The
FCTC subgroup's analysis is based on the nature of the Medicaid
disbursement as a state entitlement, and the considerable operational
discretion vested in state agencies in the administration of the
Medicaid program, including discretion to create unique eligibility
standards for enrollment of providers and to establish criteria for
disbursement of funds. These important factors distinguish Medicaid
disbursements from federal payments under Medicare, which are
transmitted more directly from the federal government to medical
providers. IRS' Office of Chief Counsel also completed a study of these
issues and concurred with the FCTC subgroup's conclusion that Medicaid
disbursements do not qualify as federal payments subject to continuous
levy.
If you have any questions, or if you would like to discuss this
response in more detail, please contact Frederick W. Schindler,
Director, Collection Policy at (202) 283-7650.
Sincerely,
Signed by:
Linda E. Stiff:
Acting Commissioner:
Enclosure:
Recommendation 1:
Conduct a study to determine whether Medicaid payments can be
incorporated in the continuous levy program.
Response:
The FCTC subgroup and the IRS Office of Chief Counsel have completed
independent studies and determined that Medicaid disbursements do not
qualify as federal payments and therefore cannot be incorporated in the
continuous levy program.
Recommendation 2:
Evaluate the 25 referred cases detailed in this report for appropriate
additional aggressive collection action and criminal investigation as
warranted.
Response:
The IRS will work with your office to secure additional information on
the 25 cases identified in your audit with indications of abuse or
potential criminal activity. We plan to review each of these case files
and refer them for additional action as appropriate.
[End of section]
Appendix IV: Comments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services:
Department Of Health & Human Services:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
Administrator:
Washington, DC 20201:
Date: September 27, 2007:
To: Gregory Kutz:
Government Accountability Office:
Subject: Government Accountability Office (GAO) Draft Report:
"Medicaid: Thousands of Medicaid Providers Abuse the Federal Tax
System" (GAO-08-17):
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject GAO
draft report. The objectives of the report were--(1) to determine if
Medicaid providers have unpaid Federal taxes and, if so, the magnitude
of such debts; (2) to identify examples of Medicaid providers that have
engaged in abusive or criminal activities; and (3) to determine whether
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the States
prevent health care providers with tax problems from enrolling in
Medicaid or participate in the continuous levy program to pay Federal
tax debts.
Section 6034 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA), codified at 42
U.S.C. 1396y-6, established the Medicaid Integrity Program and provided
a dedicated appropriation to support the Medicaid Integrity Program's
implementation. Although the States are generally responsible for
Medicaid program integrity, including provider enrollment, CMS is
responsible for implementing the Medicaid Integrity Program. In doing
so, CMS strives to improve information sharing among State Medicaid
programs and other stakeholders.
Although the draft report includes no recommendations for action by
CMS, we are concerned about the tone and language in the draft report
that reference, and would imply, certain responsibilities of CMS and
the State Medicaid agencies which, under current law, would be
inappropriate. We would suggest two approaches to address such
concerns: (1) Revise the language, if appropriate, to remove the
suggestion of such responsibilities; and (2) Include language in the
recommendations section which states that neither CMS nor the States
have such responsibilities.
Specific Comments:
1. Goals of the Report--The goals of the report, as they are phrased,
make implications that are never addressed in the report. For instance,
Goal 1 is to "determine if providers who receive Medicaid payments have
unpaid Federal taxes, and if so, the magnitude of Federal tax debts
owed by these Medicaid providers." As indicated, the goal is to collect
information about Medicaid providers that would be relatively
objective; however, the implication is that there is some direct
correlation between owing taxes and being a Medicaid provider. This
implied connection is never evaluated or addressed in this inquiry.
Goal 3 is to "determine whether CMS and selected States prevent health
care providers with tax problems from enrolling in Medicaid or
participate in the continuous levy program to pay Federal tax debts."
Again, although this would appear to be a relatively factual
determination, the implication is that there is an underlying
connection between the activity (preventing providers with tax problems
from participating in the Medicaid program) and the authority and
responsibility to perform such activity. In fact, as discussed in the
report, the authority is limited, if not precluded by existing law.
2. Continuous Levy Program -- Page 6 of the report states that--:
"A provision of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 authorizes the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) to continuously levy certain Federal payments
made to delinquent taxpayers. However, in the 10 years since its
passage, IRS has not determined whether Medicaid payments are
considered Federal payments and thus subject to the continuous levy
program or determine the feasibility of incorporating such payments
into the program."
It is clear that the Continuous Levy program is the direct
responsibility of the IRS, and as indicated, the IRS has not determined
that Medicaid payments fall under the purview of the program.
Furthermore, as stated in the draft report, Federal law prohibits
disclosure of taxpayer data to CMS and States. Nevertheless, the report
implies that the administrators of Medicaid (i.e., CMS and the State
Medicaid agencies) should be conducting the indicated activities,
despite the fact that the report does not establish any relationship
between being a tax delinquent, meeting the requirements of being a
Medicaid provider, and receiving Medicaid payments. Further, there is
no connection made in the report between the amount of the tax
delinquency of the entities (which happens to be Medicaid providers)
and the level of Medicaid payments made to such providers.
GAO Recommendation:
There were no recommendations made to CMS.
Additional Technical Comments:
Apart from comments on the draft report's substantive arguments, CMS
notes several typographical/stylistic errors in the report. For
instance, page 8 describes CMS as the "Centers for Medicaid and
Medicaid Services." (Emphasis added.) Additionally, Table 1, designed
to highlight Medicaid providers/tax cheats, repeatedly refers to the
providers as having received "Medicare" funds.
In conclusion, the report does not make the case for actions by CMS and
State Medicaid agencies, and yet leaves the impression that CMS and
States should be conducting certain activities even if precluded under
current Federal law. We believe that the stated goals for this
investigation were based on misconceptions about the authority and
responsibilities of the Medicaid program. The language of the report
consequently reflected these misconceptions. In this regard, we
suggest, at a minimum, that the recommendations of the final version of
the report state clearly that neither CMS nor the States have an
obligation to screen potential Medicaid providers for unpaid Federal
tax debts. Furthermore, the report should be edited to remove any
implication that CMS and State Medicaid agencies are in any way
responsible for the report's findings.
[End of section]
Appendix V: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
GAO Contact:
Greg D. Kutz, (202) 512-6722, or kutzg@gao.gov:
Acknowledgments:
In addition to the contact named above, the following individuals made
major contributions to this report: Matthew Valenta, Assistant
Director; Erika Axelson; Ray Bush; Jeremiah Cockrum; Bill Cordrey;
Kenneth Hill; John Kelly; Tram Le; Barbara Lewis; Andrew McIntosh; John
Ryan; Steve Sebastian; Robert Sharpe; Barry Shillito; Pat Tobo; and
Jenniffer Wilson made key contributions to this report.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] GAO, High-Risk Series: An Update, GAO-07-310 (Washington, D.C.:
Jan. 2007).
[2] GAO, Financial Management: Some DOD Contractors Abuse the Federal
Tax System with Little Consequence, GAO-04-414T (Washington, D.C.: Feb.
12, 2004); Financial Management: Thousands of Civilian Agency
Contractors Abuse the Federal Tax System with Little Consequence, GAO-
05-683T (Washington, D.C.: June 16, 2005); and Financial Management:
Thousands of GSA Contractors Abuse the Federal Tax System, GAO-06-492T
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 14, 2006).
[3] In addition to our audits of federal contractors with tax debts, we
also conducted audits of combined federal campaign charities and exempt
organizations with federal tax debts. GAO, Tax Debt: Some Combined
Federal Campaign Charities Owe Payroll and Other Federal Taxes, GAO-06-
887 (Washington, D.C.: July 28, 2006) and Tax Compliance: Thousands of
Organizations Exempt from Federal Income Tax Owe Nearly $1 Billion in
Payroll and Other Taxes, GAO-07-563 (Washington, D.C.: June 29, 2007).
[4] GAO, Medicare: Thousands of Medicare Part B Providers Abuse the
Federal Tax System, GAO-07-587T (Washington D.C.: Mar. 20, 2007).
[5] There are 56 Medicaid programs, including one for each of the 50
states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam,
Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Hereafter, all 56
entities are referred to as states.
[6] Throughout this report, these seven states are referred to as the
selected states.
[7] We considered activity to be abusive when a Medicaid provider's
actions or inactions, though not illegal, took advantage of the
existing tax enforcement and administration system to avoid fulfilling
federal tax obligations and were deficient or improper when compared
with behavior that a prudent person would consider reasonable.
[8] Because some Medicaid providers may do business with Medicare and
other federal agencies, such as Veterans Affairs, some of the
approximately 30,000 Medicaid providers described in this report may
also have been included in our reports concerning the Department of
Defense, General Services Administration, civilian federal contractors,
Medicare Part B providers, and tax-exempt organizations that abuse the
federal tax system.
[9] Payroll taxes include amounts that employers withhold from
employees' wages for federal income taxes, Social Security, and
Medicare as well as the related employer matching contributions for
Social Security and Medicare taxes. Employers are responsible for
remitting payroll taxes to IRS and are liable for any outstanding
balance.
[10] Willful failure to remit payroll taxes is a criminal felony
offense while the failure to properly segregate payroll taxes can be a
criminal misdemeanor offense. 26 U.S.C. §§ 7202, 7215 and 7512 (b).
[11] States screen health care providers prior to enrollment into the
Medicaid program. States also process and pay Medicaid claims and are
reimbursed for the federal share of these payments by CMS.
[12] Each quarter, states submit to CMS an estimate of their Medicaid
expenditures for the upcoming quarter. CMS then authorizes the states
to draw on federal funds to pay the federal Medicaid share.
[13] Our estimate of Medicaid providers with tax debt as of September
30, 2006, excluded (1) tax debts that have not been agreed to by the
tax debtor or affirmed by the court, (2) tax debts from calendar year
2006, (3) approved Medicaid claims less than $100, and (4) tax debts
less than $100.
[14] 26 U.S.C. § 6672.
[15] 26 U.S.C. § 7202.
[16] 26 U.S.C. § 7215 and 26 U.S.C. § 7512 (b).
[17] A "tax period" varies by tax type. For example, the tax period for
payroll and excise taxes is generally one quarter of a year. The
taxpayer is required to file quarterly returns with IRS for these types
of taxes, although payment of the taxes occurs throughout the quarter.
In contrast, for income, corporate, and unemployment taxes, a tax
period is 1 year.
[18] GAO, Internal Revenue Service: Recommendations to Improve
Financial and Operational Management, GAO-01-42 (Washington D.C.: Nov.
17, 2000).
[19] The 10-year time limit may be suspended and include periods during
which the taxpayer is involved in a collection due process appeal,
litigation, a pending offer-in-compromise, or an installment agreement.
As a result, fig. 3 includes taxes that are for tax periods from more
than 10 years ago.
[20] For example, one of the Medicaid provider case studies had not
filed personal income tax returns for the last couple of years.
According to IRS records, the Medicaid provider in question earned at
least $300,000 in revenue in the last tax year of our review. In
another case example, a Medicaid provider had not filed its tax returns
for the last several years. In fact, the IRS revenue officers indicated
that the provider was defunct. However, according to IRS records, the
Medicaid provider in question earned at least $1 million in revenue in
the last tax year of our review and after the provider was classified
as defunct.
[21] According to IRS, nonfilers and underpayment of taxes made up the
rest of the gross tax gap.
[22] GAO, Internal Revenue Service: Procedural Changes Could Enhance
Tax Collections, GAO-07-26 (Washington D.C.: Nov. 15, 2006).
[23] Each week IRS sends FMS an extract of its tax debt files
containing updated account balances of tax debts that are already in
Treasury Offset Program (TOP), the new tax debts that need to be added
to TOP, and all taxes in TOP that need to be removed. FMS sends payment
data to TOP to be matched against these unpaid federal taxes. If there
is a match and IRS has updated TOP to reflect that it has completed all
legal notifications, the federal payment is reduced (levied) to help
satisfy the unpaid federal taxes. In addition to federal tax debts, the
TOP database also includes federal nontax debts, state tax debts, and
child support debts.
[24] 26 U.S.C. § 7202.
[25] 26 U.S.C. § 7215 and 26 U.S.C. § 7512 (b).
[26] Taxpayer records (e.g., IRS Unpaid Assessment File, transcripts)
were not accessed for this case example. All information concerning
this case was found through court records and Medicaid claim
information provided by the state.
[27] States screen health care providers prior to enrollment into the
Medicaid program. States also process and pay the Medicaid claims and
are reimbursed for the federal share of such payments by CMS.
[28] Officials from California stated that they do consider federal
debts, including tax debts, if it is self-disclosed on the Medicaid
application. California officials said that no verification is made.
[29] 26 U.S.C. § 6103.
[30] Under section 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code, IRS has the
authority to file a lien upon all property and rights to property,
whether real or personal, of a delinquent taxpayer.
[31] To improve the collection of unpaid taxes, IRS is authorized to
continuously levy up to 100 percent for federal payments related to
goods and services. To implement this levy authority, IRS, in
coordination with the Department of the Treasury's FMS, implemented the
Federal Levy Payment Program in July 2000. This program uses FMS's
Treasury Offset Program (TOP) for the levy of federal payments.
[32] In addition to the continuous levy program, IRS also has the
authority to legally seize property either held by the taxpayer or
owned by the taxpayer and held by a third party. This authority
includes the seizure of Medicaid receivables held by states and owed to
health care providers. Unlike levies from the continuous levy program,
each levy is typically a one-time seizure of property (i.e., Medicaid
receivables) held by states at a specific point of time and is done on
a case-by-case basis based on the particular circumstances of the case.
IRS officials stated that they do not know how much in tax levies were
collected from Medicaid payments.
[33] Medicaid providers from the seven selected states had $475 million
in tax debts in TOP as of September 30, 2006. In addition, these
providers had $241 million in federal nontax debts, $202 million in
delinquent child support, and $6 million in state tax debts.
[34] Under federal accounting standards, unpaid assessments require
taxpayer or court agreement to be considered federal taxes receivables.
Compliance assessments and memo accounts are not considered federal
taxes receivable because they are not agreed to by taxpayers or the
courts.
[35] We define "related entities" as entities that share common
owner(s) or officer(s), a common TIN, or a common address.
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone:
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.
Orders should be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room LM:
Washington, DC 20548:
To order by Phone:
Voice: (202) 512-6000:
TDD: (202) 512-2537:
Fax: (202) 512-6061:
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, JarmonG@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, DC 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, DC 20548:
