Graduate Medical Education
Trends in Training and Student Debt
Gao ID: GAO-09-438R May 4, 2009
The federal government invests significantly in medical education through various programs to help ensure that the anticipated supply of new physicians meets the nation's health care needs. Medicare, the federal health care program for elderly and certain disabled people, subsidizes training for medical school graduates in hospitals and other teaching institutions by helping to support the increased costs associated with postgraduate medical training. These subsidy payments provided hospitals and other teaching institutions with an additional $8.76 billion for postgraduate medical training in fiscal year 2008. In addition, Medicaid, a joint federal and state program that finances health care for certain low-income individuals, provides funding for graduate medical education. In order to pay for medical school tuition and related fees, students often rely on loans to finance their education. The Department of Education (Education) administers loan programs that are available to medical school students. These loans may be made by private lenders and guaranteed by the federal government or made directly by the federal government through a student's school. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) administers various scholarships, loans, and loan repayment programs for disadvantaged students and those committing to practice in underserved areas or train in specific specialties. In addition, the Department of Veterans Affairs provides funding and training opportunities for new physicians in its medical facilities. Students must complete an undergraduate education and typically 4 years of medical school, at which point they earn a medical degree and become physicians. By their last year of medical school, students typically choose a specialty in which they will undertake required postgraduate medical training, known as residency, in order to practice medicine without supervision. Most specialties can fall into three general categories: primary care, surgical, and procedural. Most students apply for residency through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), which matches applicants with residency programs based on the preferences of both parties. However, because more students apply for some specialties than positions are available, some students may not receive a position in their preferred specialty. Residency can last 3 to 5 years, depending on the specialty. After residency, some physicians may decide to pursue further postgraduate medical training, known as a fellowship, in order to become a subspecialist. For example, to become a cardiologist, a medical school graduate must complete an internal medicine residency followed by a cardiology fellowship. In some cases, depending on the specialty or subspecialty, a physician could spend 7 or more years in postgraduate medical training. Congress asked GAO to provide information on graduate medical education. Specifically, we focused on (1) trends in postgraduate medical training, (2) factors that influence medical students' specialty choice, and (3) trends in the amounts of student debt incurred by medical school graduates. Enclosure I contains information on graduate medical education. You also asked us to provide information on trends in postgraduate dental education and student debt and thoracic surgery fellowships; that information can be found at enclosures II and III, respectively.
In summary, we found that medical students prefer surgical and procedural specialties, and physician subspecialization is increasing. Relative to the number of available residency positions, more medical students have preferred surgical and procedural specialties over primary care specialties since 1999, according to national data. As a result, surgical and procedural specialties have been more competitive than primary care specialties. Students earning an MD degree from U.S. medical schools fill higher proportions of the more competitive surgical and procedural residency positions than students earning a DO degree and students graduating from international medical schools. In addition, the percentage of physicians pursuing subspecialty training grew from 2002 to 2007, according to national data. This trend was observed in fields such as orthopedic surgery (a surgical subspecialty), anesthesiology (a procedural specialty), and family medicine (a primary care specialty). Multiple factors and demographic characteristics influence students' specialty choice. While there is no consensus on the most influential factors affecting specialty choice, students consider various factors either individually or in concert when selecting a specialty, according to multiple sources, including published literature, a 2008 AAMC survey, and experts we interviewed. For example, students may consider their intellectual interest in the specialty, their exposure to the specialty, or the prestige of the specialty when making their specialty choice. Some factors may also lead students to pursue certain specialties while avoiding others. For example, the desire for a controllable lifestyle--a predictable schedule and fewer on-call hours--and high salary may lead students to pursue procedural specialties such as anesthesiology, and avoid other specialties such as primary care. Demographic characteristics such as gender and marital status are associated with student being more likely to enter certain specialties. For instance, married students are more like to select primary care specialties and women are more likely to select obstetrics and gynecology and less likely to choose surgery. Although medical student debt is rising, physicians are eligible for federal loan repayment relief plans during postgraduate medical training and can eventually earn high incomes that can be used to repay their loans. Medical school tuition and fees have increased significantly since 1998. Medical students can borrow up to $40,500 per year through the federal Stafford loan program with additional funding available through other federal loan programs; these loan programs can cover the full cost of medical school. The median amount of educational debt for indebted medical students graduating in 2008 was $155,000--a 53 percent increase since 1998, controlling for inflation. Once out of medical school, residents earn stipends--on average about $3,729 a month for a 1st year resident. With $155,000 in debt, a resident's monthly loan payment could reach over $1,700 (about 48 percent of pretax income). However, residents have repayment options that can reduce their monthly debt payment until they complete postgraduate training. One option that will be available to borrowers after July 1, 2009, would cap the average 1st year resident's loan payments at about $364 month while a second option--forbearance--allows for a temporary postponement or reduction in loan payments. Physicians generally do not qualify for these options once postgraduate training is complete because, although they incur more debt than other advanced degree holders, they also earn higher incomes.
GAO-09-438R, Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training and Student Debt
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-09-438R
entitled 'Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training and Student
Debt' which was released on May 4, 2009.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
GAO-09-438R:
United States Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
May 4, 2009:
The Honorable George Miller:
Chairman:
The Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Education and Labor:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable Robert Andrews:
Chairman:
Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions:
Committee on Education and Labor:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable Charles W. Boustany, Jr.
The Honorable Joe Courtney:
The Honorable Tom Price:
House of Representatives:
Subject: Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training and Student
Debt:
The federal government invests significantly in medical education
through various programs to help ensure that the anticipated supply of
new physicians meets the nation's health care needs. Medicare, the
federal health care program for elderly and certain disabled people,
subsidizes training for medical school graduates in hospitals and other
teaching institutions by helping to support the increased costs
associated with postgraduate medical training. These subsidy payments
provided hospitals and other teaching institutions with an additional
$8.76 billion[Footnote 1] for postgraduate medical training in fiscal
year 2008.[Footnote 2] In addition, Medicaid, a joint federal and state
program that finances health care for certain low-income individuals,
provides funding for graduate medical education.[Footnote 3] In order
to pay for medical school tuition and related fees, students often rely
on loans to finance their education. The Department of Education
(Education) administers loan programs that are available to medical
school students.[Footnote 4] These loans may be made by private lenders
and guaranteed by the federal government or made directly by the
federal government through a student's school. The Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) administers various scholarships, loans,
and loan repayment programs for disadvantaged students and those
committing to practice in underserved areas or train in specific
specialties.[Footnote 5] In addition, the Department of Veterans
Affairs provides funding and training opportunities for new physicians
in its medical facilities.[Footnote 6]
Students must complete an undergraduate education and typically 4 years
of medical school, at which point they earn a medical degree and become
physicians. By their last year of medical school, students typically
choose a specialty in which they will undertake required postgraduate
medical training, known as residency, in order to practice medicine
without supervision. Most specialties can fall into three general
categories: primary care, surgical, and procedural. Most students apply
for residency through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP),
[Footnote 7] which matches applicants with residency programs based on
the preferences of both parties.[Footnote 8] However, because more
students apply for some specialties than positions are available, some
students may not receive a position in their preferred specialty.
Residency can last 3 to 5 years, depending on the specialty. After
residency, some physicians may decide to pursue further postgraduate
medical training, known as a fellowship, in order to become a
subspecialist. For example, to become a cardiologist, a medical school
graduate must complete an internal medicine residency followed by a
cardiology fellowship. In some cases, depending on the specialty or
subspecialty, a physician could spend 7 or more years in postgraduate
medical training.
You asked us to provide information on graduate medical education.
Specifically, we focused on (1) trends in postgraduate medical
training, (2) factors that influence medical students' specialty
choice, and (3) trends in the amounts of student debt incurred by
medical school graduates. Enclosure I contains information on graduate
medical education. You also asked us to provide information on trends
in postgraduate dental education and student debt and thoracic surgery
fellowships; that information can be found at enclosures II and III,
respectively.
To examine trends in postgraduate medical training, we reviewed
relevant academic and professional literature and analyzed data on
residency offered, student preferences, and residency placements from
1998 to 2008.[Footnote 9] We also interviewed officials and reviewed
information or documents from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), the agency that oversees the Medicare program; the
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; HRSA; and professional
organizations, including groups that represent medical schools, medical
students, and physicians. To examine factors that influence medical
students' specialty choice, we reviewed relevant academic and
professional literature and examined a survey of 4th year medical
students developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges
(AAMC).[Footnote 10] We also interviewed officials from professional
organizations, including groups that represent medical schools, medical
students, and physicians. To examine trends in medical student debt, we
analyzed self-reported student indebtedness data from the AAMC survey
of 4th year medical students from 1998 to 2008. We also examined data
on medical school tuition and fees from an AAMC survey of medical
schools and physician salaries collected by the Medical Group
Management Association (MGMA). We also interviewed federal officials
and reviewed relevant agency guidance to identify the types of federal
loans and repayment plans that are available to medical students.
We discussed the NRMP, AAMC, and MGMA data sources with knowledgeable
officials and determined that the data were sufficiently reliable for
our purposes. (See enclosure IV for a more detailed description of our
scope and methodology.) We conducted our work from September 2008 to
April 2009 in accordance with all sections of GAO's Quality Assurance
Framework relevant to our objectives. The framework requires that we
plan and perform the engagement to obtain sufficient and appropriate
evidence to meet our stated objectives and discuss any limitations in
our work. We believe that the information and data obtained, and the
analysis conducted, provide a reasonable basis for any findings and
conclusions.
In summary, we found that medical students prefer surgical and
procedural specialties, and physician subspecialization is increasing.
Relative to the number of available residency positions, more medical
students have preferred surgical and procedural specialties over
primary care specialties since 1999, according to national data. As a
result, surgical and procedural specialties have been more competitive
than primary care specialties. Students earning an MD degree from U.S.
medical schools fill higher proportions of the more competitive
surgical and procedural residency positions than students earning a DO
degree and students graduating from international medical schools. In
addition, the percentage of physicians pursuing subspecialty training
grew from 2002 to 2007, according to national data. This trend was
observed in fields such as orthopedic surgery (a surgical
subspecialty), anesthesiology (a procedural specialty), and family
medicine (a primary care specialty).
Multiple factors and demographic characteristics influence students'
specialty choice. While there is no consensus on the most influential
factors affecting specialty choice, students consider various factors
either individually or in concert when selecting a specialty, according
to multiple sources, including published literature, a 2008 AAMC
survey, and experts we interviewed. For example, students may consider
their intellectual interest in the specialty, their exposure to the
specialty, or the prestige of the specialty when making their specialty
choice. Some factors may also lead students to pursue certain
specialties while avoiding others. For example, the desire for a
controllable lifestyle--a predictable schedule and fewer on-call
hours[Footnote 11]--and high salary may lead students to pursue
procedural specialties such as anesthesiology, and avoid other
specialties such as primary care. Demographic characteristics such as
gender and marital status are associated with students being more
likely to enter certain specialties. For instance, married students are
more likely to select primary care specialties and women are more
likely to select obstetrics and gynecology and less likely to choose
surgery.
Although medical student debt is rising, physicians are eligible for
federal loan repayment relief plans during postgraduate medical
training and can eventually earn high incomes that can be used to repay
their loans. Medical school tuition and fees have increased
significantly since 1998. Medical students can borrow up to $40,500 per
year through the federal Stafford loan program[Footnote 12] with
additional funding available through other federal loan programs; these
loan programs can cover the full cost of medical school. The median
amount of educational debt for indebted medical students graduating in
2008 was $155,000--a 53 percent increase since 1998, controlling for
inflation. Once out of medical school, residents earn stipends--on
average about $3,729 a month for a 1st year resident. With $155,000 in
debt, a resident's monthly loan payment could reach over $1,700 (about
48 percent of pretax income). However, residents have repayment options
that can reduce their monthly debt payment until they complete
postgraduate training. One option that will be available to borrowers
after July 1, 2009, would cap the average 1st year resident's loan
payments at about $364 month while a second option--forbearance--allows
for a temporary postponement or reduction in loan payments. Physicians
generally do not qualify for these options once postgraduate training
is complete because, although they incur more debt than other advanced
degree holders, they also earn higher incomes.
We provided a draft of this report to the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), the department that oversees CMS and HRSA;
Education; and AAMC. HHS's written comments are reprinted in enclosure
V. HHS, Education, and AAMC also provided technical comments, which we
incorporated as appropriate.
HHS remarked that GAO reported an increase in the specialty choice of
family medicine by U.S. medical school graduates. However, we did not
state this in our report; rather, we noted that physician
subspecialization was generally increasing and that this trend was
observed within several specialties, including family medicine. In
other words, the incidence of physicians who have already chosen family
medicine as their specialty but pursue additional training beyond
initial residency has increased. As we noted in our analysis of U.S. MD
student preferences relative to positions available, primary care
specialties, which include family medicine, have been less popular than
surgical and procedural specialties.
HHS also commented that service obligation--that is, a requirement that
physicians practice in a specific field of medicine under certain
conditions in exchange for benefits, such as educational scholarships
or loan repayment--is an additional factor that potentially influences
specialty choice.[Footnote 13] For example, medical students can apply
to HHS's National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program to
receive funds[Footnote 14] if they agree to complete a primary care
residency and practice in an underserved area after residency. The NHSC
also offers a loan repayment program for primary care physicians
practicing in an underserved area. In our report, we focused on broad,
underlying factors that affect students' specialty choice rather than
specific contractual obligations.
Providing oral comments on a draft of this report, the AAMC largely
agreed with our findings and noted that the report captured the
complexities of medical students' decision making in choosing a
specialty. It also added several relevant points. First, additional
demographic characteristics, such as the geographic background (e.g.,
urban or rural) and the socioeconomic status of the medical student and
his or her family, are associated with specialty choice. It added that
debt does not appear to significantly influence specialty choice, which
is consistent with our findings. Second, entry rates for various
specialties are influenced by numerous factors, including the
prevailing market conditions and environment. As a result, it noted,
trends in specialty choice often shift and have been cyclical over
time. For example, primary care specialties were more popular in the
mid 1990s when managed care was introduced and the anticipated demand
was high. And third, there is an emerging trend of physicians who
provide general medical care only in hospitals where they may often
work set shifts instead of being on call. The trend, which is
particularly associated with physicians specializing in internal
medicine (but not subspecializing), limits the number of physicians
providing primary care services in traditional settings, such as
physicians' offices and health clinics.
In addition, the AAMC raised concerns about including neurology and
pathology in our procedural specialties category. It suggested that we
consider categorizing them as "cognitive" or "other" specialties. While
we did not create another category for these specialties, when we
conducted an additional analysis that removed them from the procedural
specialties category in our preferences-to-positions ratio analysis, we
found that their exclusion did not change the trend for procedural
specialties from 1998 to 2008.
If you or your staff have questions about this report, please contact
Kathleen M. King at (202) 512-7114 or KingK@gao.gov, or George A. Scott
at (202) 512-7215 or ScottG@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of
Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last
page of this report. GAO staff members who made key contributions to
this report are listed in enclosure VI.
Signed by:
Kathleen M. King:
Director, Health Care:
Signed by:
George A. Scott:
Director, Education, Workforce, and Income Security Issues:
Enclosures - 6:
[End of section]
Enclosure I: Briefing Slides:
Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training and Student Debt:
Briefing for the Staff of:
The Honorable George Miller:
Chairman:
The Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Education and Labor:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable Robert Andrews:
Chairman:
Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions:
Committee on Education and Labor:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable Charles W. Boustany, Jr.
The Honorable Joe Courtney:
The Honorable Tom Price:
House of Representatives:
Overview:
* Introduction;
* Objectives;
* Scope and Methodology;
* Background;
* Results.
Introduction:
The federal government invests significantly in medical education to
help ensure that the anticipated supply of new physicians meets future
health care needs.
Federal government support includes:
* Medicare payments, which provided about $8.7 billion to hospitals and
other institutions for medical training in fiscal year 2008.
* Medicaid payments, which provided nearly $3.2 billion in 2005.
* Student loans, tuition assistance, and student loan repayment.
* Training opportunities at federal facilities.
Figure: The road to becoming a doctor can be long and costly:
[Refer to PDF for image: illustration]
* Undergraduate education (4 years);
* Medical school (typically 4 years);
* Residency (3 to 5 years); A residency is postgraduate clinical
training under physician educators that typically occurs in hospitals.
* Fellowship (1 or more years); A fellowship is further training
required to become a subspecialist.
* Practicing physician.
Source: GAO.
[End of figure]
[End of section]
Objectives:
1. Describe the trends in postgraduate medical training.
2. Describe the factors that influence medical school students‘
specialty choice.
3. Describe the trends in the amounts of student debt incurred by
medical school graduates.
[End of section]
Scope and Methodology:
We reviewed relevant literature published from 1998 to 2008 from:
* 16 research databases;
* 162 articles on residency trends, factors affecting specialty choice,
and student debt.
We interviewed officials and reviewed information or documents from:
* Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services;
* Health Resources and Services Administration;
* Department of Education;
* Medicare Payment Advisory Commission;
* Professional organizations, including groups that represent medical
schools, medical students, and physicians.
We reviewed and analyzed publicly available data, including:
* National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data for 1998-2008 on
residency positions offered, student preferences, and placements;
- The NRMP matches applicants with residency programs.
* Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) survey of 4th year
medical students, called the Graduation Questionnaire, which covers
factors that may affect specialty choice. It also contains information
on student debt.
* Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) Physician Compensation
and Production Survey data on median annual earnings for various
medical specialties.
[End of section]
Background: Medical education:
U.S. medical school enrollment has grown:
* In 2008, over 22,500 1st year students were enrolled, an all-time
high.
Eligible applicants for U.S. postgraduate medical training programs
include:
* Doctor of Medicine (MD) students graduating from a U.S. medical
school.
* Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) students graduating from a U.S.
osteopathic medical school.
* International medical school students, who can be U.S. citizens or
non-U.S. citizens graduating from a foreign medical school.
Figure: Percentage of Physicians in Postgraduate Medical Training by
School Type: 2007:
[Refer to PDF for image: pie-chart]
U.S. MD graduates: 67%;
International medical school graduates: 27%;
U.S. DO graduates: 6%.
Source: AAMC and the American Medical Association (AMA).
[End of figure]
The length of residency training varies depending on the specialty
chosen.
* Three years for primary care fields, such as family medicine, general
internal medicine, and general pediatrics.
* Five years for general surgery.
Fellowship training to become a subspecialist can add one or more
years.
* To become a cardiothoracic surgeon, a medical school graduate must
complete a general surgery residency followed by a cardiothoracic
surgery fellowship.
* To become a cardiologist, a medical school graduate must complete an
internal medicine residency followed by a cardiology fellowship.
Postgraduate medical training generally occurs at hospitals, medical
centers, and Veterans Affairs facilities.
* Each program determines how many residents or fellows it would like
to train.
* Most postgraduate training programs are accredited by the
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which
evaluates a program‘s ability to adequately train the desired number of
residents by considering the program‘s facilities, faculty size, and
other factors.
Figure: Total Number of Residents and Fellows in ACGME Accredited
Postgraduate Training Programs, 1987-2007:
Year: 1987;
Total Residents and Fellows: 81,410.
Year: 1988;
Total Residents and Fellows: 81,093.
Year: 1989;
Total Residents and Fellows: 85,330.
Year: 1990;
Total Residents and Fellows: 82,902.
Year: 1991;
Total Residents and Fellows: 86,217.
Year: 1992;
Total Residents and Fellows: 89,368.
Year: 1993;
Total Residents and Fellows: 97,370.
Year: 1994;
Total Residents and Fellows: 97,832.
Year: 1995;
Total Residents and Fellows: 98,035.
Year: 1996;
Total Residents and Fellows: 98,076.
Year: 1997;
Total Residents and Fellows: 98,143.
Year: 1998;
Total Residents and Fellows: 97,383.
Year: 1999;
Total Residents and Fellows: 97,989.
Year: 2000;
Total Residents and Fellows: 96,806.
Year: 2001;
Total Residents and Fellows: 96,410.
Year: 2002;
Total Residents and Fellows: 98,258.
Year: 2003;
Total Residents and Fellows: 99,964.
Year: 2004;
Total Residents and Fellows: 101,291.
Year: 2005;
Total Residents and Fellows: 103,106.
Year: 2006;
Total Residents and Fellows: 104,879.
Year: 2007;
Total Residents and Fellows: 106,012.
Source: AMA and AAMC data.
[End of figure]
Key Policy Changes in Postgraduate Medical Training:
In part to constrain costs, Congress limited the number of postgraduate
medical training positions supported by Medicare with the 1997 Balanced
Budget Act.
In 2003, ACGME implemented a limit on resident and fellow duty hours
during postgraduate medical training due to concerns regarding
residents‘ and fellows‘ work schedules and patient safety.
* Duty hours must be limited to 80 hours per week and 1 day out of 7
days must be free from all educational and clinical obligations.
Federal student loans:
Loans available to students pursuing higher education:
* Stafford Loans”the government‘s largest student loan program.
* Depending on the student‘s financial need, these loans can be
subsidized (the government pays interest while the student is in
school) or unsubsidized.
* PLUS Loans”provide more funding for graduate students who have met
their maximum Stafford loan eligibility.
* Perkins Loans”low-interest rate loans for students with exceptional
financial need.
Low-interest rate loans available to students in health professions:
* Loans for Disadvantaged Students”for students from disadvantaged
backgrounds.
* Primary Care Loans”for students who agree to practice in primary
care.
Most specialties can fall into three categories:
* Primary care specialties include family medicine, general internal
medicine, and general pediatrics.
* Surgical specialties include general surgery, and subspecialties in
orthopedic, plastic, and thoracic surgery.
* Procedural specialties include radiology, dermatology, and
anesthesiology, as well as subspecialties in cardiology, rheumatology,
and immunology.
Summary of Findings:
1. Medical students prefer surgical and procedural specialties, and are
more likely to subspecialize.
2. Multiple factors and demographic characteristics influence specialty
choice.
3. Although medical student debt is rising, federal loan repayment
relief plans offer assistance during training and physicians can earn
high incomes that can be used to repay their loans.
1: Surgical and Procedural Specialties Preferred, and Subspecialization
Increasing: Surgical and Procedural Specialties Have Been More
Competitive:
Since 1999”after accounting for the number of positions available”more
U.S. MD students have preferred surgical and procedural specialties over
primary care specialties, according to national data.
Because more students prefer surgical and procedural specialties
relative to the number of available positions, these specialties have
been more competitive.
Since 2004, surgical specialties have been the most competitive.
Figure: Number of U.S. MD Student Applicants who Prefer the Specialty
Group Relative to the Number of Available Positions in the Specialty
Group, 1998-2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple line graph]
1.0 = Number of available positions equals number of applicants. Above
1.0 indicates more applicants than positions; below 1.0 indicates fewer
applicants than positions.
Ratio (preferences/positions):
Year: 1998;
Procedural: 0.63;
Surgical: 0.78;
Primary care: 0.65.
Year: 1999;
Procedural: 0.69;
Surgical: 0.79;
Primary care: 0.62.
Year: 2000;
Procedural: 0.77;
Surgical: 0.76;
Primary care: 0.58.
Year: 2001;
Procedural: 0.84;
Surgical: 0.73;
Primary care: 0.56.
Year: 2002;
Procedural: 0.85;
Surgical: 0.72;
Primary care: 0.54.
Year: 2003;
Procedural: 0.84;
Surgical: 0.81;
Primary care: 0.51.
Year: 2004;
Procedural: 0.83;
Surgical: 1.10;
Primary care: 0.56.
Year: 2005;
Procedural: 0.81;
Surgical: 1.06;
Primary care: 0.57.
Year: 2006;
Procedural: 0.82;
Surgical: 1.05;
Primary care: 0.58.
Year: 2007;
Procedural: 0.81;
Surgical: 1.02;
Primary care: 0.58.
Year: 2008;
Procedural: 0.79;
Surgical: 1.06;
Primary care: 0.56.
Source: GAO analysis of NRMO data.
[End of figure]
1: Surgical and Procedural Specialties Preferred: U.S. MD students fill
higher proportions of available surgical and procedural positions:
Figure: NRMP Positions Filled by Applicant Type, 2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: stacked vertical bar graph]
Applicant type: Surgical;
U.S. MD students: 88%;
U.S. DO students: 2%;
International medical students: 6%.
Applicant type: Procedural;
U.S. MD students: 73%;
U.S. DO students: 8%;
International medical students: 10%.
Applicant type: Primary care;
U.S. MD students: 56%;
U.S. DO students: 7%;
International medical students: 30%.
Note: Bars do not add to 100 percent because other student groups, such
as previous U.S. MD graduates and Canadian students, are not included.
Source: GAO analysis of NRMP data.
[End of figure]
1: Surgical and Procedural Specialties Preferred: More doctors are
pursuing training to become subspecialists:
Across selected specialties, the percentage of physicians
subspecializing grew from 2002 to 2007, according to national data.
This trend was also observed for family medicine.
The majority of newly accredited programs in recent years are for
training in subspecialties, according to ACGME officials. In contrast,
the number of newly accredited programs for initial residency training
has been relatively stable.
Figure: Change in Subspecialization Rates for Selected Specialties or
Subspecialties:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple vertical bar graph]
Specialty/subspecialty: Family medicine;
Percentage of Residents: 2002: 2.6%;
Percentage of Residents: 2007: 4.9%.
Specialty/subspecialty: Internal medicine;
Percentage of Residents: 2002: 47.2%;
Percentage of Residents: 2007: 54.9%.
Specialty/subspecialty: Orthopedic surgery;
Percentage of Residents: 2002: 34.1%;
Percentage of Residents: 2007: 52.4%.
Specialty/subspecialty: Radiology;
Percentage of Residents: 2002: 30.7%;
Percentage of Residents: 2007: 40.6%.
Specialty/subspecialty: Anesthesiology;
Percentage of Residents: 2002: 9.5%;
Percentage of Residents: 2007: 15.5%.
Source: AAMC and AMA.
Note: Internal medicine excludes the sub-subspecialties of clinical
cardiac electrophysiology and interventional cardiology.
[End of figure]
2: Multiple Factors, Demographic Characteristics Influence Specialty
Choice: Students consider multiple factors:
Students consider multiple factors”individually or in concert”when
choosing a specialty, as suggested by published literature, a 2008
AAMC survey, and experts.
* While there is no consensus regarding the most influential factors,
there are several commonly cited factors, including:
Figure: Demographic Characteristics Influencing Specialty Choice:
[Refer to PDF for image: illustration]
Choice is influenced by:
Salary;
Prestige;
Malpractice concerns;
Exposure to the specialty;
Influence of a mentor or role model;
Lifestyle;
Intellectual interest in the specialty;
Options for fellowship training (i.e., the ability to subspecialize).
Source: GAO.
[End of figure]
2: Multiple Factors Influence Specialty Choice: Factors lead students
to pursue or avoid certain specialties:
Intellectual interest in the specialty:
* Students are attracted to rheumatology because they are interested in
the complexity of diseases treated by rheumatologists.
* Some students do not choose primary care specialties because they
prefer to focus in a specialized area of medicine.
Exposure to specialties in medical school:
* Students who had a community-based primary care experience during
medical school were more likely to select a primary care specialty.
* Students may be less likely to select surgery because they found
their surgical work repetitive during medical school.
Prestige:
* Students view surgery as prestigious while primary care specialties
may not be considered as prestigious.
Salary and lifestyle:
* Procedural specialties, with generally higher salaries and a more
controllable lifestyle, may be more attractive.
- An anesthesiologist earns about $400,000 a year, according to the
MGMA, and can have a predictable schedule with fewer on-call hours.
* Primary care specialties, with generally lower salaries and a less
controllable lifestyle, may be less attractive.
- A family medicine physician earns about $174,000 a year, according to
the MGMA, and can have a less predictable schedule with more on-call
hours.
2: Multiple Factors Influence Specialty Choice: Demographics and
personality traits are important:
Demographics”such as marital status and gender”and personality traits
may be associated with specialty choice, according to published
studies.
* Married students are more likely to enter primary care specialties
such as pediatrics and family practice.
* Women are more likely to choose primary care and obstetrics and
gynecology, but less likely to choose surgery.
* Personality traits, such as altruism, may lead some to select primary
care specialties, while students who have competitive personalities may
select surgery.
3: Debt Is Rising but Federal Assistance Is Available and Physicians
Can Earn High Incomes:
Median debt of indebted graduating U.S. MD students has increased by
53 percent since 1998, controlling for inflation.
The median level of debt among indebted U.S. MD students graduating in
2008 was $155,000.
Figure: Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduating U.S. MD
Students, 1998-2008 (2008 constant dollars):
Year: 1998;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $101,261.
Year: 1999;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $107,450.
Year: 2000;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $110,217.
Year: 2001;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $116,051.
Year: 2002;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $117,394.
Year: 2003;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $121,396.
Year: 2004;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $129,671.
Year: 2005;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $130,398.
Year: 2006;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $136,632.
Year: 2007;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $143,220.
Year: 2008;
Median Educational Debt for Indebted Graduates: $155,000.
Source: AAMC.
[End of figure]
3: Debt, Federal Assistance, Physician Income: Nearly half of
graduating medical students are at least $150,000 in debt:
Figure: Distribution of Student Debt Among U.S. MD Students Graduating
in 2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph]
Debt level: No Debt;
Percentage of students: 13%.
Debt level: $1 to $49,999;
Percentage of students: 9%.
Debt level: $50,000 to $99,999;
Percentage of students: 10%.
Debt level: $100,000 to $149,999;
Percentage of students: 19%.
Debt level: $150,000 to $199,999;
Percentage of students: 24%.
Debt level: $200,000 or more.
Percentage of students: 25%.
Approximately 50% of students have a debt of $150,000 or more.
Source: AAMC.
[End of figure]
3: Debt, Federal Assistance, Physician Income: Medical school tuition
is also increasing:
Median tuition and fees for 1st year U.S. MD students have increased by
about $9,100 at private schools (27 percent) and about $10,500 at public
schools (83 percent) since the 1997-1998 school year, controlling for
inflation.
* Undergraduate tuition and fees have also increased.
In the 2007-2008 school year, median tuition and fees for 1st year U.S.
MD students ranged from approximately:
* $23,000 at public schools (in-state residents) to:
* $43,000 at private schools (out-of-state residents).
Figure: Median Tuition and Fees for First-Year U.S. MD Students, 1998-
2008 (2008 constant dollars):
School year: 1997-1998;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $33,929;
Public schools (in-state residents): $12,580.
School year: 1998-1999;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $34,961;
Public schools (in-state residents): $12,983.
School year: 1999-2000;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $35,547;
Public schools (in-state residents): $13,451.
School year: 2000-2001;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $35,982;
Public schools (in-state residents): $13,800.
School year: 2001-2002;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $36,763;
Public schools (in-state residents): $14,570.
School year: 2002-2003;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $37,598;
Public schools (in-state residents): $15,963.
School year: 2003-2004;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $38,486;
Public schools (in-state residents): $18,316.
School year: 2004-2005;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $40,355;
Public schools (in-state residents): $20,693.
School year: 2005-2006;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $41,015;
Public schools (in-state residents): $21,409.
School year: 2006-2007;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $41,689;
Public schools (in-state residents): $22,672.
School year: 2007-2008;
Private schools (out-of-state residents): $43,060;
Public schools (in-state residents): $23,065.
Source: AAMC.
[End of figure]
3: Debt, Federal Assistance, Physician Income: Federal loans are
available to cover the full cost of medical education:
Stafford loans: medical students can borrow up to $40,500 a year, with
an aggregate limit of $224,000 (including undergraduate loans).
* The annual limit is $20,000 more than other students can borrow.
* The aggregate limit is $85,500 more than other students can borrow.
* The Department of Education increased the aggregate loan limit for
medical students from $189,125 to $224,000 in April 2008.
PLUS loans: graduate and professional degree students can borrow up to
the full cost of attendance minus other federal assistance.
Table: Sample Annual Budget for Student Attending Private Medical
School:
Cost of attendance[A]:
Tuition and fees: $48,000;
Expenses: $19,000;
Total cost: $67,000.
Federal loans available:
Stafford loan: $40,500;
PLUS loan: $26,500;
Total borrowed: $67,000.
Students can also receive financial aid from scholarships, grants, and
other loan programs.
[A] Based on average costs reported by the five medical schools with
the highest tuition and fees according to AAMC. Expenses include such
costs as books, supplies, housing, food, and transportation.
Source: GAO.
[End of table]
3: Debt, Federal Assistance, Physician Income: Options for reducing
repayment burdens until after training:
Borrowers generally must start repaying their loans within 6 months of
graduation.
* With $155,000 in debt, a resident‘s monthly loan payment could reach
over $1,700 per month. Since the average 1st year resident stipend is
$3,729, these payments would account for about 48 percent of pretax
income.
Repayment relief options:
* 20/220 Pathway (available until June 30, 2009)”a temporary deferment
of loan payments for students with high debt relative to income.
- Eligible residents can defer all federal loan payments without
accruing interest on subsidized loans.
* Income-based repayment plan (available after July 1, 2009)”a
graduated repayment plan for students with high debt relative to
income.
- Caps the average 1st year resident‘s loan payments at $364 per month
(about 10 percent of pretax income).
* Forbearance”a temporary postponement or reduction in loan payments.
- Residents are automatically eligible, but interest continues to
accrue on all loans and is added to the principal. As a result, the
amount due on the loans is larger than it would be if residents had not
sought forbearance.
* After postgraduate training is complete, physician income typically
increases significantly. At this higher income level, borrowers
generally do not qualify for repayment relief options.
3: Debt, Federal Assistance, Physician Income: Physicians incur more
debt but can earn high incomes to repay it:
Figure: Median Income and Debt by Degree, 2007:
[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph]
Masters degree:
Median educational debt of recent indebted graduates: $32,987;
Median annual income: $62,920.
Doctoral degree:
Median educational debt of recent indebted graduates: $52,560;
Median annual income: $85,837.
Professional degree:
Median educational debt of recent indebted graduates: $98,047;
Median annual income: $100,000.
Physician:
Median educational debt of recent indebted graduates: $140,000;
Median annual income: $332,450;
Median for procedural and surgical specialties[A]: $332,450;
Median for primary care: $182,322.
Source: GAO analysis based on data from the AAMC, MGMA, National
Postsecondary Student Aid Study, and Census Bureau.
[A] Due to the way MGMA data is reported, the specialties included in
this calculation are somewhat different from the procedural and surgical
categories used in earlier slides.
[End of figure]
[End of section]
Enclosure II: Trends in Postgraduate Dental Education and Student Debt:
Unlike physicians, dentists are generally not required to complete
postgraduate training, but may instead practice after graduating from a
4-year dental school and completion of licensure requirements,
according to the American Dental Association (ADA). However, dentists
may choose to pursue postgraduate training through a general or
specialty dental program.
General dentistry programs last 1 or 2 years and are affiliated with
dental schools, which typically offer advanced education in general
dentistry (AEGD) programs, or hospitals, which typically offer general
practice residency (GPR) programs. Specialty dental programs allow a
dentist to train in one of several specialties--endodontics,
orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, oral and maxillofacial
surgery, oral and maxillofacial radiology, oral and maxillofacial
pathology, periodontics, pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, or public
health dentistry. Many of these programs last from 1 to 3 years.
[Footnote 15] Some specialty programs also include graduate-level
coursework leading to an additional degree.
This enclosure describes: (1) trends in postgraduate dental training,
(2) factors that influence dental school graduates' choice to pursue
postgraduate training, and (3) trends in debt for graduating dental
students. We relied on multiple methodologies to conduct our work,
including data analysis, literature review, and interviews with experts
in dental education, such as the ADA and the American Dental Education
Association (ADEA). (See enclosure IV for a detailed description of the
scope and methodology.)
The percentage of graduating students planning to pursue postgraduate
dental training was stable from 1995 to 2006, according to ADEA data
(see figure 1). While most dental school seniors planned to go directly
into private practice, almost 40 percent planned to pursue postgraduate
dental training. The rest planned to go into teaching, research,
administration, government service, or were undecided.
Figure 1: Dental Students' Career or Academic Plans Following
Graduation, 1995-2006:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple line graph]
Year: 1995;
Total private practice: 49.8%;
Advanced education: 36%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 14.2%.
Year: 1996;
Total private practice: 49.9%;
Advanced education: 36.3%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 13%.
Year: 1997;
Total private practice: 49.3%;
Advanced education: 36.6%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 13.9%.
Year: 1998;
Total private practice: 51.2%;
Advanced education: 35.8%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 13%.
Year: 1999;
Total private practice: 53.6%;
Advanced education: 34%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 14.6%.
Year: 2000;
Total private practice: 51.5%;
Advanced education: 34.1%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 14.4%.
Year: 2001;
Total private practice: 52.8%;
Advanced education: 34.4%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 12.9%.
Year: 2002;
Total private practice: 52.2%;
Advanced education: 35.7%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 12%.
Year: 2003;
Total private practice: 50.3%;
Advanced education: 37.1%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 12.5%.
Year: 2004;
Total private practice: 50.4%;
Advanced education: 38.6%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 10.9%.
Year: 2005;
Total private practice: 51.6%;
Advanced education: 38.6%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 9.9%.
Year: 2006;
Total private practice: 52.5%;
Advanced education: 37.8%;
Other (teaching, research, administration, government service or
undecided): 9.6%.
Source: ADEA.
[End of figure]
The percentage of graduating seniors applying to general programs
remained stable at about 30 percent from 1996 to 2006. The percentage
of those applying to specialty programs grew from about 18 percent in
1996 to about 24 percent in 2006--over a 30 percent increase in the
percentage of students applying to specialty programs over a 10-year
period (see figure 2). Despite the increase in the percentage of
students applying to specialty programs between 1996 and 2006, ADA data
show that the proportion of specialists in the dental workforce
remained close to 20 percent from 1991 through 2005. According to 2006
ADEA data, orthodontics was the most popular dental specialty (about 32
percent of specialty program applicants), followed by pediatric
dentistry (about 24 percent) and oral and maxillofacial surgery (about
17 percent).
Figure 2: Percentage of Dental Students Applying for General Programs
or Specialty Programs, 1996-2006:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple line graph]
Year: 1995;
Specialty programs: 18%;
General programs: 30.5%.
Year: 1996;
Specialty programs: 18.4%;
General programs: 29.5%.
Year: 1997;
Specialty programs: 19.7%;
General programs: 33.2%.
Year: 1998;
Specialty programs: 21.8%;
General programs: 29.4%.
Year: 1999;
Specialty programs: 16.9%;
General programs: 25.6%.
Year: 2000;
Specialty programs: 17.1%;
General programs: 28.6%.
Year: 2001;
Specialty programs: 22.8%;
General programs: 28.8%.
Year: 2002;
Specialty programs: 24.6%;
General programs: 29.9%.
Year: 2003;
Specialty programs: 23.6%;
General programs: 29.4%.
Year: 2004;
Specialty programs: 255.4%;
General programs: 30.5%.
Year: 2005;
Specialty programs: 23.9%;
General programs: 30.4%.
Year: 2006;
Specialty programs: 24.2%;
General programs: 29.3%.
Source: ADEA.
[End of figure]
Dentists often choose to pursue postgraduate dental training because of
personal interest in the content of a program, according to research
studies and experts. For example, dentists may be interested in the
intellectual content, diagnostic challenges, or the skills and talents
required for a particular specialty. Experts also indicated that
competitiveness--the applicant's ability to obtain a training position-
-influences whether a student applies for postgraduate dental training.
Data from the 2006 ADEA survey of graduating dental school seniors show
that debt influences their postgraduate plans--22 percent noted it as a
major influence on their decision.
Dental student debt is rising. In 2006, the average indebtedness of all
graduating dental students was $145,465--up about 55 percent from 1996,
after controlling for inflation--according to ADEA data. Average
tuition and fees for 1st year dental students was $29,717 for the 2006-
2007 school year--up about 40 percent from the 1997-1998 school year,
after controlling for inflation--according to ADA data. Average tuition
and fees for the 2006-2007 school year were $17,866 for public dental
schools and $41,568 for private dental schools. Average tuition and
fees for the 1997-1998 school year were $8,529 for public dental
schools and $25,798 for private dental schools.
Like physicians in residency, dentists can qualify for the same loan
repayment relief options--income-based repayment plans and forbearance--
while they are completing their postgraduate dental training.[Footnote
16] In addition, like physicians, dentists can earn high incomes once
their training is complete. In 2005, the average salary was $198,350
for general dentists, and $304,020 for dentists who specialized,
according to the ADA.
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure III: Trends in Thoracic Surgery Fellowships:
Thoracic surgery fellowships are an exception to the generally
increasing rate of subspecialization among physicians. Forty percent
fewer physicians applied for 2008 thoracic surgery fellowship positions
than those applying for 2004 positions, according to national data (see
figure 3). Moreover, less than 67 percent of 2008 positions were
filled, down from 94 percent of 2004 positions (see figure 4). (See
enclosure IV for a detailed description of our scope and methodology.)
Figure 3: Number of Fellowship Applicants for Selected National
Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Surgical Subspecialties, 2004 and
2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple vertical bar graph]
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Colon and rectal surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 83;
Number of applicants (2008): 101.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Hand surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 102;
Number of applicants (2008): 127.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Minimally invasive and gastrointestinal
surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 130;
Number of applicants (2008): 176.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive
surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 40;
Number of applicants (2008): 35.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Pediatric surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 49;
Number of applicants (2008): 62.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Vascular surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 108;
Number of applicants (2008): 139.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Thoracic surgery;
Number of applicants (2004): 161;
Number of applicants (2008): 96 (40% decline).
Source: NRMP.
Notes: Years refer to the year of appointment, that is, the year the
physician begins his or her fellowship. Includes only surgical
subspecialties for which 2004 and 2008 data were available.
[End of figure]
Figure 4: Percentage of Fellowship Positions Filled for Selected NRMP
Surgical Subspecialties, 2004 and 2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: multiple vertical bar graph]
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Colon and rectal surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 98.6%;
Percentage filled (2008): 98.6%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Hand surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 70.5%;
Percentage filled (2008): 86.8%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Minimally invasive and gastrointestinal
surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 87.6%;
Percentage filled (2008): 83.8%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive
surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 100%;
Percentage filled (2008): 100%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Pediatric surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 96.2%;
Percentage filled (2008): 100%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Vascular surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 88.3%;
Percentage filled (2008): 96.6%.
NRMP surgical subspecialty: Thoracic surgery;
Percentage filled (2004): 93.6%;
Percentage filled (2008): 66.9%.
Source: NRMP.
Notes: Years refer to the year of appointment, that is, the year the
physician begins his or her fellowship. Includes only surgical
subspecialties for which 2004 and 2008 data were available.
[End of figure]
Published articles suggest that fewer employment opportunities for
thoracic surgeons may be contributing to the declining interest in
thoracic surgery fellowships. For example, some thoracic surgeons may
need an additional fellowship focusing on a narrower area of thoracic
surgery, such as adult cardiac surgery, to secure employment. Another
reason for the decline, according to experts, may be due to the growing
use of nonsurgical treatments for cardiovascular disease, such as
stents,[Footnote 17] that are not performed by thoracic surgeons.
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure IV: Scope and Methodology:
Our review focused primarily on medical students enrolled in U.S.
medical schools leading to the degree of Doctor of Medicine (MD) and
allopathic[Footnote 18] postgraduate medical training.[Footnote 19] To
conduct our work, we relied on multiple methodologies, including
analyses of summary data, literature reviews, and interviews.
Data Analysis:
To examine trends in postgraduate medical training, we examined
National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data for 1998 to 2008. The
NRMP administers a service--known as the match--that matches applicants
with residency programs based on the ranked preferences of both
parties.[Footnote 20] The NRMP collects and maintains data on the
number of applicants, the type of applicants' medical school,[Footnote
21] the applicants' preferred specialty (their first or only choice),
and the specialty in which the applicant placed. According to the NRMP,
the match fills about 80 percent of all residency positions. NRMP is
the most comprehensive data source on student preferences and available
residency positions. In addition, U.S. MD students are required to
enter the match when applying for residency.[Footnote 22] In 2008,
28,737 applicants applied to the match and 23,674 were successfully
matched to a position. NRMP data are publicly available on the NRMP Web
site.
To examine trends in U.S. MD students' preferences, we calculated a
ratio of the number of U.S. MD student applicants who preferred primary
care, surgical, or procedural specialties to the number of 1st and 2nd
year residency positions available in each specialty group. (See table
1 for the NRMP specialties and subspecialties categorized under the
primary care,[Footnote 23] surgical, and procedural specialty groups;
the numbers of student preference and available positions; and the
ratio of student preferences to positions.) To determine the proportion
of U.S. MD students, DO students, and international medical students
that filled surgical, procedural, and primary care positions in 2008,
we divided the number of students from each type of medical school that
had received a position in primary care, surgical, or procedural
specialties by the number of 1st and 2nd year positions available in
each specialty group. (See table 2 for the number of students that
filled each specialty category.)
Table 1: Categories of NRMP Specialties and Subspecialties and U.S. MD
Student NRMP Preferences and Positions Available in 2008:
Category: Primary care;
NRMP specialties/subspecialties: family medicine; internal medicine;
pediatrics;
Number of U.S. MD student applicants who expressed the specialty
category as a preferred choice (2008): 5,992;
Number of positions available (2008): 10,643;
Ratio, preferences to positions (2008): 0.56.
Category: Surgical;
NRMP specialties/subspecialties: general surgery; neurological surgery;
orthopedic surgery; plastic surgery; otolaryngology; urology;
Number of U.S. MD student applicants who expressed the specialty
category as a preferred choice (2008): 2,217;
Number of positions available (2008): 2,093;
Ratio, preferences to positions (2008): 1.06.
Category: Procedural;
NRMP specialties/subspecialties: Anesthesiology; dermatology; emergency
medicine; neurology; radiology; radiation oncology; pathology; physical
medicine and rehabilitation;
Number of U.S. MD student applicants who expressed the specialty
category as a preferred choice (2008): 4,605;
Number of positions available (2008): 5,831;
Ratio, preferences to positions (2008): 0.79.
Category: Total;
Number of U.S. MD student applicants who expressed the specialty
category as a preferred choice (2008): 12,814;
Number of positions available (2008): 18,567;
Ratio, preferences to positions (2008): N/A.
Source: GAO and GAO analysis of NRMP data.
Notes: NRMP included combined internal medicine and pediatrics programs
in its preference data; however, NRMP does not consider preliminary or
transitional year programs a preference for a specific specialty, and
therefore they were excluded from its preference data. We grouped NRMP
applicants into three specialty categories, and therefore did not
include all NRMP applicants in our analysis. We also did not include
specialties or subspecialties with fewer than 10 NRMP positions (with
the exception of combined programs, which NRMP included under internal
medicine and pediatrics accordingly). In addition, obstetrics/
gynecology and psychiatry were not included because of debate within
the industry about whether they are considered primary care
specialties. However, including them in our preferences-to-positions
ratio did not change the trend for primary care specialties from 1998
to 2008. In providing comments on our report, AAMC stated that
neurology and pathology are not typically considered procedural
specialties. When we conducted an additional analysis that removed them
from the procedural specialties category in our preferences-to-
positions ratio analysis, we found that their exclusion did not change
the trend for procedural specialties from 1998 to 2008.
[End of table]
Table 2: Number of U.S. MD, DO, and International Medical Students that
Filled Each Specialty Category in 2008:
Category: Primary care;
U.S. MD students: 5,926;
DO students: 784;
International medical students: 3,207.
Category: Surgical;
U.S. MD students: 1,843;
DO students: 34;
International medical students: 133.
Category: Procedural;
U.S. MD students: 4,287;
DO students: 449;
International medical students: 596.
Category: Total;
U.S. MD students: 12,056;
DO students: 1,267;
International medical students: 3,936.
Source: GAO analysis of NRMP data.
Notes: For purposes of consistency, we excluded the same programs and
specialties or subspecialties as we did in our preferences-to-positions
ratio analysis; we also excluded combined programs with less than 10
NRMP positions and those in which the first specialty mentioned was not
included in our original definitions of primary care, surgical, and
procedural.
[End of table]
To examine factors that influence specialty choice, we reviewed data
from AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire (GQ). The data are available on
the AAMC Web site. The GQ is an annual survey of 4th year MD students
at U.S. medical schools. The survey asks students to rate the
importance of factors that influence their specialty choice; students
do not rank the factors in order of importance. We examined data from
2005 to 2008 because the factors listed in the survey for these years
were considered to be comparable by AAMC officials. The response rate
for the survey for these years ranged from 33 percent in 2005 to 71
percent in 2008.[Footnote 24] Despite the variation in the response
rates from 2005 to 2008, our analysis generally revealed little change
in the influence of the factors on specialty choice. We therefore only
reported data for 2008.
To examine trends in student debt, we reviewed median summary data for
1998 to 2008 from the GQ published in the AAMC Data Book: Medical
Schools and Teaching Hospitals by the Numbers (May 2008 edition), also
available on the AAMC Web site.[Footnote 25] The GQ asks 4th year
medical students about their outstanding loans for both medical school
and undergraduate education. The data are self-reported near the time
of students' exit interviews with their financial aid office, when they
are informed of their debt levels. The overall response rate for the
survey has ranged from 33 percent to 92 percent since 1998, but this
variation does not appear to have resulted in any year-to-year
irregularity in the data. To validate the GQ debt data, AAMC officials
compare the aggregate student-reported data with administrative records
from medical school financial aid offices. The AAMC debt data are
widely used because they are the most comprehensive available. Further,
we also compared the AAMC data with data obtained from Education's
National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) of 2000 and 2004. The
comprehensive, nationwide NPSAS is designed to determine how students
and their families pay for postsecondary education and includes data on
outstanding student loan debt. We determined that average medical
student debt levels from the NPSAS were comparable with the AAMC data.
We adjusted the historical AAMC debt data for inflation using the gross
domestic product price index. We also calculated estimated monthly loan
payments for medical school graduates using the median level of student
indebtedness reported by the AAMC. Our calculation was based on the
assumption of a 10-year repayment schedule at the standard Stafford
loan interest rate of 6.8 percent. Our calculated loan payments
corresponded with estimates produced with Education's repayment plan
calculator available on its Web site.[Footnote 26]
To examine medical school tuition and fees, we examined data from the
AAMC Tuition and Student Fees Survey of allopathic medical schools,
published in the AAMC Data Book: Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals
by the Numbers. We adjusted the AAMC median historical data for
inflation using the gross domestic product price index. To create an
example of an annual medical student budget, we examined cost of
attendance estimates from the five medical schools with the highest
tuition and fees according to AAMC. These estimates are developed by
each school's financial aid office and reflect the average estimated
cost of attending medical school.
To examine the expected income of medical school graduates, we reviewed
2007 data from the Medical Group Management Association's (MGMA)
Physician Compensation and Production Survey: 2008 Report Based on 2007
Data. The report contains the median compensation for physicians by
specialty and also overall median compensation for the categories of
primary care and specialists. The MGMA category of specialists includes
specialties that we considered procedural or surgical specialties (for
example, anesthesiology and orthopedic surgery). (See table 1.) It also
includes specialties we excluded in our analysis of NRMP data (for
example, obstetrics/gynecology) and additional specialties not included
in the NRMP data (for example, gastroenterology). (See table 3.)
However, because of the way MGMA data were reported, we were unable to
recalculate median compensation amounts based solely on the specialties
included in our NRMP categories . Therefore, we considered the MGMA
category of specialists to correspond roughly to our combined
categories of procedural and surgical.
Table 3: GAO Categories and MGMA Categories and Specialties/
Subspecialties:
GAO category: Primary care;
MGMA category: Primary care;
Specialties/subspecialties:
Family Practice;
Internal Medicine;
Pediatrics/Adolescent Medicine.
GAO category: Procedural and surgical;
MGMA category: Specialists;
Specialties/subspecialties:
Anesthesiology;
Cardiology: Invasive;
Cardiology: Noninvasive;
Dermatology;
Emergency Medicine;
Gastroenterology;
Hematology/Oncology;
Neurology;
Obstetrics/Gynecology;
Ophthalmology;
Orthopedic Surgery;
Otorhinolaryngology;
Psychiatry;
Pulmonary Medicine;
Radiology: Diagnostic;
Surgery: General;
Urology.
Source: GAO, MGMA.
[End of table]
To collect these data, the MGMA mailed surveys to 9,975 of its member
organizations, which include medical group practices and other
organizations involved in physician practice management. The response
rate was about 20 percent. The MGMA defines compensation to include the
amounts reported on W-2, 1099, or K1 (for partnerships) tax forms plus
all voluntary salary reductions. The MGMA instructs respondents to
include the following sources of compensation: salary, bonus and/or
incentive payments, research stipends, honoraria, and distribution of
profits. According to MGMA officials, they ensure the reliability of
the data by examining them for inconsistencies and comparing them with
other industry studies. Although multiple compensation surveys are
available, we used the MGMA data because they have been used in many
health policy research articles and were recommended by experts we
interviewed. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
uses MGMA compensation data when setting Medicare physician payment
rates.
To analyze median debt and income for other advanced degree holders, we
reviewed debt data from the NPSAS of 2004 and income data from the
Census Bureau's 2008 Current Population Survey (2007 data), the most
recent years for which data are available. To account for the different
years, we adjusted the 2004 NPSAS data for inflation to 2007 dollars
using the gross domestic product price index. The Current Population
Survey reports median earnings for full-time workers age 25 and over by
educational attainment. These sources provide data on holders of three
types of advanced degrees: masters degree (including M.S., M.Ed., and
M.B.A.), doctoral degree (e.g., Ph.D.), and professional degree
(including M.D. and J.D.), which is required for practicing in certain
professions.
To examine trends in postgraduate dental training, we reviewed publicly
available data for 1995 to 2006 from the American Dental Education
Association's (ADEA) Survey of Dental School Seniors. The survey asks
about students' choice to pursue dentistry, educational debt, and
postgraduation plans. The response rate was 84 percent in 2006 and
about 79 percent from 1995 through 2006. Using the survey data, we
created three categories for students' postgraduation plans: private
practice, advanced education, and other. For private practice, we
included students who planned to pursue solo private practice, enter a
partner or group practice, or begin as an associate or employee of a
private practice. For advanced education, we included students who
planned to enter general practice residency or advanced education in
general or specialty dental programs. For other, we included students
who planned to pursue teaching, research or administrative positions,
or government service, and those who are undecided. To examine trends
in debt for graduating dental students, we reviewed data from the same
survey. We adjusted the ADEA historical data for inflation using the
gross domestic product price index. The number of U.S. dental school
graduates ranged from 3,930 in 1997 to 4,515 in 2006.
To examine dental school tuition and fees, we reviewed data from the
American Dental Association's (ADA) 2006-2007 Survey of Dental
Education, which contains information on 1st year tuition and fees. All
U.S. dental schools are required to complete the survey to maintain
their accreditation status. We adjusted the ADA historical data for
inflation using the gross domestic product price index.
To examine trends in thoracic surgery fellowships, we reviewed publicly
available NRMP fellowship data on surgical subspecialties for 2004 and
2008. We included only surgical subspecialties for which 2004 and 2008
data were available.
We determined that data from the NRMP, AAMC, MGMA, ADA, and ADEA were
sufficiently reliable for our purposes. We assessed the reliability of
the NRMP data by interviewing NRMP officials about the residency
matching process, data entry procedures, and data accuracy assurance.
We assessed the reliability of the AAMC GQ data by interviewing AAMC
officials about the survey methodology, response rate, and changes in
the data over time. We also corroborated the GQ debt data against
similar NPSAS data for selected years. We assessed the reliability of
the MGMA data by interviewing MGMA officials about the survey
methodology, data entry procedures, and the data accuracy assurance. We
assessed the reliability of the ADA and ADEA data by reviewing
documentation about the survey methodology and the response rates for
the ADA Survey of Dental Education and the ADEA Survey of Dental School
Seniors.
Literature and Document Review:
We also reviewed literature published from 1998 to 2008 that included
research articles identified through 16 databases such as MEDLINE,
PsycINFO, Social SciSearch, and Gale Group Health and Wellness. To
examine trends in postgraduate medical training (including thoracic
surgery fellowships), we searched "trends, medical residencies,"
"applications, medical residencies," "trends, physician supply," and
other such terms. To examine the factors that influence medical
students' specialty choice, we searched terms such as "lifestyle,"
"salary," "Medicare payments," "job market," and "debt." We also
reviewed relevant articles from the annual medical education issue of
the Journal of the American Medical Association. We also included in
our review articles that were identified by government officials and
representatives of professional associations we interviewed. We
identified the factors influencing specialty choice by determining
those frequently mentioned in the articles we reviewed. We then
corroborated that these factors had been mentioned by experts as being
influential or were identified as having influenced the specialty
choice of most student respondents to the AAMC GQ survey. In all, we
reviewed 162 articles.
To examine trends in postgraduate medical training and the factors
affecting specialty choice, we reviewed information or documents
provided to us by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the Council on
Graduate Medical Education. We also examined documents provided to us
by the professional organizations we interviewed. (See below for the
full list of government agencies and professional organizations we
interviewed.)
To identify the types of federal loans and repayment plans available to
medical students, we reviewed relevant regulations and guidance from
Education and HRSA of the Department of Health and Human Services. We
used these documents to evaluate eligibility requirements and the
general terms of the loan programs.
To provide information on postgraduate dental education and the factors
that influence dental specialization, we reviewed research articles
that were published from 1998 to 2008. We identified research articles
through 18 databases and searched using such terms as "dental
residencies," "dental specialists," "salary," "lifestyle," and
"training". We reviewed a total of 28 articles. The articles were used
to inform our findings on postgraduate dental education and to
supplement the information we obtained from experts and publicly
available data from the ADA and the ADEA.
Interviews with Government Officials and Professional Groups:
To gather information on medical and dental education and training, we
interviewed officials from government agencies and the following
professional organizations, including groups that represent medical
schools, medical students, and physicians:
Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education:
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine:
Association of American Medical Colleges:
American Academy of Family Physicians:
American Board of Medical Specialties:
American College of Surgeons:
American Dental Association:
American Dental Education Association:
American Medical Association:
American Medical Student Association:
American Osteopathic Association:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
Council on Graduate Medical Education[Footnote 27]:
Department of Education:
Educational Commission of Foreign Medical Graduates:
Health Resources and Services Administration:
Medical Group Management Association:
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission:
National Resident Matching Program:
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons:
We conducted our work from September 2008 to April 2009 in accordance
with all sections of GAO's Quality Assurance Framework that are
relevant to our objectives. The framework requires that we plan and
perform the engagement to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence to
meet our stated objectives and discuss any limitations in our work. We
believe that the information and data obtained, and the analysis
conducted, provide a reasonable basis for any findings and conclusions.
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure V: Comments from the Department of Health and Human Services:
Note: Page numbers in the draft report may differ from those in this
report.
Department Of Health And Human Services:
Office Of The Secretary:
Assistant Secretary for Legislation:
Washington, DC 20201:
April 23, 2009:
Kathleen M. King:
Director, Health Care:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20548:
Dear Ms. King:
Enclosed are comments on the U.S. Government Accountability Office's
(GAO) report entitled: "Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training
and Student Debt" (GAO-09-438R).
The Department appreciates the opportunity to review this report before
its publication.
Sincerely,
Signed by:
Barbara Pisaro Clark:
Acting Assistant Secretary for Legislation:
Attachment:
[End of letter]
General Comments Of The Department Of Health And Human Services (HHS)
On The U.S. Government Accountability Office's Draft Report: "Graduate
Medical Education: Trends In Training And Student Debt" (GAO-09-438R):
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), has reviewed the GAO's draft
report entitled, "Graduate Medical Education: Trends in Training and
Student Debt" (GAO-09-438R).
GAO has made reference on Page 4 (second paragraph, 5th sentence) and
on page 17 (first bullet on slide and in the accompanying chart) that
there has been an increase in the choice of Family Medicine by United
States Medical School Graduates (USMGs). While it is true that the
percentage of Family Medicine residency slots filled by USMGs has
increased from 2005 to 2009, this is the result of two factors. The
first is the number of residency slots offered has decreased by 8
percent, and the second is the number of USMGs filling those slots has
decreased by only 4 percent. Moreover, USMGs entering Family Medicine
residencies have decreased as a percentage of all USMGs between 2005
and 2009 from 8.1 percent to 7.4 percent. Therefore, HRSA believes
stating an increase in the choice of USMGs is misleading and that all
references to an increase in Family Practice residencies should be
removed from the draft correspondence.
HRSA also suggests that the GAO should include "service obligation" as
an additional factor that influences not only the choice of specialty,
but where the clinician chooses to practice and for how long. For
example, in the article, "Factors Influencing Primary Care Physician's
Choice to Practice in Medically Underserved Areas," (Academic Medicine,
Vol. 72, No. 10/October Supplement 1, 1997, pages S109 - S111) it was
found that these factors strongly influenced the decision to practice
in an underserved area. HRSA's National Health Service Corps
Scholarship Program requires a scholarship recipient to complete a
primary care residency, and the program actively seeks out scholarship
recipients with the characteristics which experience has shown are more
likely to result in the recipients wanting to practice in underserved
areas and remain after fulfillment of the service obligation.
Finally, CMS notes that the draft report does not specifically mention
residents training in podiatric programs. Under Medicare, podiatric
residents are treated the same way as dental residents.
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure VI: GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments:
GAO Contacts:
Kathleen M. King, (202) 512-7114 or kingk@gao.gov and George A. Scott,
(202) 512-7215 or scottg@gao.gov:
Staff Acknowledgments:
In addition to the contacts named above, Karen Doran and Bill J.
Keller, Assistant Directors; Stella Chiang; William W. Colvin; Elayne
Heisler; Carla Jackson Willis; Timothy Walker; and Jennifer Whitworth
made key contributions to this report.
[End of enclosure]
Footnotes:
[1] These payments include direct and indirect Medicare graduate
medical education payments. Direct payments are provided to teaching
institutions for costs directly related to medical training, such as
teachers' salaries and administrative costs, while indirect payments
are provided for the increased patient care costs associated with
medical training. For fiscal year 2008, indirect payments were about 71
percent of total Medicare graduate medical education payments. In
addition, Medicare graduate medical payments also subsidize podiatric
and dental training.
[2] In part to constrain costs, Congress limited the number of
postgraduate medical training positions supported by Medicare with the
1997 Balanced Budget Act. Medicare support for podiatric and dental
training positions was not affected by this legislation.
[3] According to the Congressional Research Service, federal and state
Medicaid payments for graduate medical education were estimated to be
about $3.2 billion in 2005. This estimate was based on 2005 survey
data. There is no formal federal reporting mechanism to document
Medicaid graduate medical education payments by state.
[4] Medical students received over $1.8 billion in federal guaranteed
or direct student loans during the 2006-2007 school year, according to
a survey of financial aid offices conducted by the Association of
American Medical Colleges.
[5] Program spending totaled about $183 million in fiscal year 2007.
This number excludes funding for HRSA student loans, which utilize
revolving loan funds derived generally from premium charges, and
includes programs for health professionals other than medical school
students and graduates, such as physician assistants and dentists.
[6] Department of Veterans Affairs' spending towards medical education
in its facilities totaled about $800 million in fiscal year 2008.
[7] The NRMP is affiliated with the Association of American Medical
Colleges.
[8] In addition to a matching service for residency programs, the NRMP
also administers a matching service for fellowship programs.
[9] Our review of postgraduate medical training trends focused on
allopathic residency. Allopathic medicine is a system of medicine that
aims to combat disease by using remedies such as drugs or surgery which
produce effects that are different from or incompatible with those of
the disease being treated; graduates of allopathic medical schools
receive a Doctor of Medicine (MD) degree. In contrast, osteopathic
medicine is a form of medical practice similar to allopathic medicine
that also incorporates manual manipulation of the body as therapy;
graduates of osteopathic medical schools receive a Doctor of
Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree. We excluded osteopathic residency
because osteopathic residency positions make up less than 6 percent of
all residency positions offered by the NRMP and the American
Osteopathic Association, the organization that administers the matching
service for osteopathic residency. However, osteopathic physicians are
included in our review because over 35 percent of osteopathic
physicians enter 1st year allopathic postgraduate medical training.
[10] Our review of factors influencing specialty choice focused on
medical students enrolled in U.S. medical schools leading to an MD
degree. Our literature review found only limited information on the
factors that influence osteopathic and international medical school
students' specialty choice and interviews we conducted with osteopathic
and international medical student groups suggested that factors
influencing these students may be similar to those influencing
allopathic students.
[11] On-call hours refer to hours when a physician can be contacted
outside of regularly scheduled work hours, such as for an emergency.
[12] These loans may be made by private lenders and guaranteed by the
federal government or made directly by the federal government through a
student's school.
[13] HHS also noted that service obligation influences where physicians
practice and the period for which they remain in their practice
location. We acknowledge that specialty choice, service obligation,
practice location, and duration of practice in a specific location can
be interrelated, but for the purposes of this report, the issue of
physician practice location and its duration were outside our scope.
[14] The NHSC Scholarship Program pays for up to 4 years of support,
including tuition, a monthly stipend, and other costs.
[15] Oral and maxillofacial surgery programs last 4 to 6 years.
[16] There is wide variation in the stipends provided to dentists in
postgraduate training. Some postgraduate training programs do not
provide dentists with stipends, while some may offer dentists over
$47,000 annually, according to the American Dental Association (ADA).
[17] Stents are small, permanent tubes placed in arteries to improve
blood flow, keep arteries from narrowing or weakening, and prevent
blockages.
[18] Allopathic medicine is a system of medicine that aims to combat
disease by using remedies such as drugs or surgery which produce
effects that are different from or incompatible with those of the
disease being treated; graduates of allopathic medical schools receive
an MD degree. In contrast, osteopathic medicine is a form of medical
practice similar to allopathic medicine that also incorporates manual
manipulation of the body as therapy; graduates of osteopathic medical
schools receive a doctor of osteopathic medicine (DO) degree.
[19] We excluded osteopathic residency because osteopathic residency
positions make up less than 6 percent of all residency positions
offered by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) and the
American Osteopathic Association, the organization that administers the
matching service for osteopathic residency. In addition, we found only
limited information on the factors that influence osteopathic and
international medical school students' specialty choice and interviews
we conducted with osteopathic and international medical student groups
suggested that factors influencing these students' decisions may be
similar to those influencing allopathic students.
[20] The NRMP is affiliated with the Association of American Medical
Colleges (AAMC).
[21] For example, medical students can graduate from (1) a U.S. medical
school leading to an MD degree, (2) a U.S. medical school leading to a
DO degree, and (3) an international medical school.
[22] U.S. MD students do not have to enter the NRMP match if they enter
the military or Canadian matches. According to 2007 data, most
physicians in U.S. postgraduate medical training earned an MD degree
from a U.S. medical school.
[23] There is some variation as to what specialties are included under
primary care. While family medicine, general internal medicine, and
general pediatrics are generally accepted as primary care specialties,
other specialties that may also be considered primary care include
obstetrics/gynecology, psychiatry, preventative medicine, geriatric
medicine, and osteopathic general practice.
[24] The GQ survey response rate declined in 2005 when the survey
became optional but has since increased.
[25] These data are not verified by the Department of Education
(Education); therefore; they may be under or overstated.
[26] Education's repayment plan calculator is available at: [hyperlink,
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSFAP/DirectLoan/RepayCalc/dlentry1.html].
[27] We attended its fall 2008 meeting, reviewed presentation
materials, and discussed the nature of the council with HRSA, the
federal agency that provides support to the council.
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Phone:
The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO‘s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO‘s Web site,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm].
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional
information.
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548: