Ryan White CARE Act
Estimated Effect of Proposed Stop-Loss Provision in H.R. 3293 on Urban Areas Gao ID: GAO-09-947R August 3, 2009Congress asked us to estimate the effect on Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990 (CARE Act) funding to urban areas if a certain stop-loss provision is enacted. The CARE Act, administered by the Department of Health and Human Services's (HHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), was enacted to address the needs of jurisdictions, health care providers, and people with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). In December 2006, the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 (RWTMA) reauthorized CARE Act programs for fiscal years 2007 through 2009. In July 2009, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3293, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2010, which contains a stop-loss provision covering CARE Act funding for urban areas that receive funding under the CARE Act. This bill has not been passed by the Senate. Under the CARE Act, funding for urban areas--Eligible Metropolitan Areas (EMA) and Transitional Grant Areas (TGA)--is primarily provided through three categories of grants: (1) formula grants that are awarded based on the case counts of people with HIV/AIDS in an urban area; (2) supplemental grants that are awarded on a competitive basis based on an urban area's demonstration of need, including criteria such as HIV/AIDS prevalence; and (3) Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants, which are supplemental grants awarded on a competitive basis for urban areas to address disparities in access, treatment, care, and health outcomes. Changes in grantees' characteristics and funding formulas can cause increases or decreases in grantees' funding.
To provide Congress with technical assistance, we developed an estimate of fiscal year 2010 Part A CARE Act funding for EMAs and TGAs with the stop-loss provision in H.R. 3293. We also developed an estimate of such funding without that provision. We used data from HHS, H.R. 3293, and the report of the House Committee on Appropriations accompanying H.R. 3293 to estimate these amounts. In order to conduct these analyses, we made a number of assumptions.
GAO-09-947R, Ryan White CARE Act: Estimated Effect of Proposed Stop-Loss Provision in H.R. 3293 on Urban Areas
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-09-947R
entitled 'Ryan White CARE Act: Estimated Effect of Proposed Stop-Loss
Provision in H.R. 3293 on Urban Areas' which was released on August 4,
2009.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
[This correspondence was revised August 7, 2009 to correct the numbers
that appear in three columns of the table in enclosure II. The columns
in the table that have been corrected are, ’Fiscal year 2009 funding,“
’H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss,“ and ’H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year
2010 funding after applying stop-loss.“]
GAO-09-947R:
United States Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
August 3, 2009:
The Honorable Michael B. Enzi:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions:
United States Senate:
Subject: Ryan White CARE Act: Estimated Effect of Proposed Stop-Loss
Provision in H.R. 3293 on Urban Areas:
You asked us to estimate the effect on Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS
Resources Emergency Act of 1990 (CARE Act) funding to urban areas if a
certain stop-loss provision is enacted. The CARE Act, administered by
the Department of Health and Human Services's (HHS) Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA), was enacted to address the needs of
jurisdictions, health care providers, and people with human
immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS).
[Footnote 1] In December 2006, the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment
Modernization Act of 2006 (RWTMA) reauthorized CARE Act programs for
fiscal years 2007 through 2009.[Footnote 2] In July 2009, the House of
Representatives passed H.R. 3293, the Departments of Labor, Health and
Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act,
2010, which contains a stop-loss provision covering CARE Act funding
for urban areas that receive funding under the CARE Act.[Footnote 3]
This bill has not been passed by the Senate.
Under the CARE Act, funding for urban areas--Eligible Metropolitan
Areas (EMA) and Transitional Grant Areas (TGA)[Footnote 4]--is
primarily provided through three categories of grants: (1) formula
grants that are awarded based on the case counts of people with HIV/
AIDS in an urban area; (2) supplemental grants that are awarded on a
competitive basis based on an urban area's demonstration of need,
including criteria such as HIV/AIDS prevalence; and (3) Minority AIDS
Initiative (MAI) grants, which are supplemental grants awarded on a
competitive basis for urban areas to address disparities in access,
treatment, care, and health outcomes. Changes in grantees'
characteristics and funding formulas can cause increases or decreases
in grantees' funding.
H.R. 3293, which was passed by the House of Representatives on July 24,
2009, contains a provision to ensure that decreases in total Part A
funding for fiscal year 2009 for each EMA and TGA would not exceed
levels specified in the bill.[Footnote 5] It would limit the total
funding decrease for the 2009 fiscal year to no more than 7.6 percent
of what the EMA or TGA received for the 2006 fiscal year. The funding
necessary to limit the decreases to urban areas would be given as
increases to supplemental grants for fiscal year 2010.
To provide you with technical assistance, we developed an estimate of
fiscal year 2010 Part A CARE Act funding for EMAs and TGAs with the
stop-loss provision in H.R. 3293.[Footnote 6] We also developed an
estimate of such funding without that provision. We used data from HHS,
H.R. 3293, and the report of the House Committee on Appropriations
accompanying H.R. 3293 to estimate these amounts.[Footnote 7] In order
to conduct these analyses, we made a number of assumptions. These
assumptions are described in notes to the accompanying tables. See
enclosure I for estimates of Part A CARE Act funding for EMAs with and
without the stop-loss provision. See enclosure II for estimates of Part
A CARE Act funding for TGAs with and without the stop-loss provision.
The objective of this work was to provide pertinent and timely
information by showing the effect of the stop-loss provision on EMAs
and TGAs for fiscal year 2010 that Congress can use in determining
funding for CARE Act programs. We used data from agency reference
documents to conduct our analyses. Because of time constraints, we did
not conduct any additional analysis of the proposed provision. We
performed our work in July and August 2009.
We are sending copies of this letter to interested congressional
committees. The letter will be available at no charge on GAO's Web site
at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov].
If you or your staff have any questions about this letter, please
contact me at (202) 512-7114 or crossem@gao.gov. Contact points for our
Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on
the last page of this letter.
Signed by:
Marcia Crosse:
Director, Health Care:
Enclosures:
[End of letter]
Enclosure I:
Table 1: Total Eligible Metropolitan Area Formula, Supplemental, and
Minority AIDS Initiative Grants for Fiscal Year 2006, Fiscal Year 2009,
and Projected Funding for Fiscal Year 2010 under Part A Funding Levels
Identified in the Report of the House Committee on Appropriations
Accompanying H.R. 3293:
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Atlanta, Ga.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $18,869,561;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $17,435,474;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $18,443,431;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $19,707,774;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$19,707,774;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $20,111,240.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Baltimore, Md.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $20,628,895;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $19,061,099;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $22,804,651;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $25,146,942;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$25,146,942;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $25,668,616.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Boston, Mass.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $13,339,141;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $12,325,366;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $13,325,857;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $14,826,513;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$14,826,513;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $15,112,210.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Chicago, Ill.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $25,044,633;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $23,141,241;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $27,410,446;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $30,399,044;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$30,399,044;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $31,030,149.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Dallas, Tex.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $13,196,377;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $12,193,452;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $14,491,860;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $16,135,491;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$16,135,491;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $16,461,969.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Detroit, Mich.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $8,428,477;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $7,787,913;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $8,811,003;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $9,649,668;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$9,649,668;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $9,847,320.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $14,963,638;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $13,826,402;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $15,225,814;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $16,723,935;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$16,723,935;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $17,082,041.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Houston, Tex.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $19,953,520;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $18,437,052;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $20,280,028;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $21,759,462;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$21,759,462;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $22,212,613.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Los Angeles, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $34,895,377;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $32,243,328;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $38,596,755;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $42,753,540;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$42,753,540;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $43,664,418.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Miami, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $23,999,914;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $22,175,921;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $26,268,588;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $28,295,403;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$28,295,403;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $28,886,672.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Nassau-Suffolk, N.Y.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $6,148,307;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: 5,681,036;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,063,346;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,133,107;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,133,107;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,261,448.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): New Haven, Conn.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $6,684,594;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $6,176,565;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,486,178;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,427,638;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,427,638;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,554,241.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): New Orleans, La.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $7,434,812;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $6,869,766;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $7,715,228;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $8,372,305;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$8,372,305;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $8,546,858.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): New York, N.Y.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $120,423,326;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $111,271,153;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $111,058,281;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $111,399,388;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $212,873;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$111,612,261;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $112,851,459.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Newark, N.J.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $14,752,254;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $13,631,083;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $14,294,358;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $14,957,651;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$14,957,651;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $15,263,596.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Orlando, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $8,561,273;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $7,910,616;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $8,184,316;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $9,102,265;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$9,102,265;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $9,276,330.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Philadelphia, Pa.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $22,384,551;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $20,683,325;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $23,627,921;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $25,849,435;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$25,849,435;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $26,384,731.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Phoenix, Ariz.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $6,519,338;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $6,023,868;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $7,891,520;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $8,817,069;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$8,817,069;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $9,003,693.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): San Diego, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $9,269,256;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $8,564,793;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $11,406,079;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $12,701,493;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$12,701,493;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $12,969,540.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): San Francisco, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $27,964,864;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $25,839,534;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $20,682,998;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $20,800,605;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $5,156,537;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$25,957,142;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $21,094,812.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): San Juan, P.R.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $13,470,347;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $12,446,601;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $13,303,840;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $13,353,898;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$13,353,898;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $13,521,736.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $9,571,830;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $8,844,371;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $9,618,021;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $10,283,094;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$10,283,094;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $10,499,803.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Washington, D.C.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $26,923,066;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $24,876,913;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $29,292,798;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $32,484,738;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$32,484,738;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $33,151,677.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): West Palm Beach, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $8,276,018;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $7,647,041;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $8,594,359;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $8,632,210;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$8,632,210;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $8,755,423.
Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA): Total;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $481,703,369;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $445,093,913;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $483,877,677;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $514,712,668;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $5,369,409[C];
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$520,082,078;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $524,212,595.
Source: GAO analysis of HHS data, H.R. 3293, and the Report of the
House Committee on Appropriations Accompanying H.R. 3293.
Notes: The projected fiscal year 2010 funding in this table is based on
the funding amount for urban areas identified in the Report of the
House Committee on Appropriations Accompanying H.R. 3293. We assumed
that the percentage of Part A funding allotted to EMAs and the
percentage allotted to Transitional Grant Areas (TGA) in fiscal year
2010 would be the same as the percentage allotted to each in fiscal
year 2009.
Because updated human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome (HIV/AIDS) case counts were not available, we used the HIV/
AIDS case counts that the Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) used to determine fiscal year 2009 funding.
We cannot determine the exact effect of the stop-loss provision on
total funding for each EMA for fiscal year 2010. It is not possible to
determine exactly how each EMA would be affected by the 7.6 percent
stop-loss for EMAs because it is not known how HRSA will award fiscal
year 2010 supplemental and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants and
because the case counts on which formula grants will be based are not
yet available.
To estimate fiscal year 2010 supplemental funding for EMAs, we
calculated the percentage of fiscal year 2009 total funding that each
area's fiscal year 2009 supplemental funding represented. We then
multiplied that percentage by the estimated total supplemental funding
to be available for distribution in fiscal year 2010. For example, if
an EMA received 2 percent of the total supplemental funding available
for distribution to EMAs in fiscal year 2009, then we estimated that
area's supplemental funding in fiscal year 2010 to be 2 percent of the
amount of supplemental funding available for distribution to EMAs.
We developed our estimate of fiscal year 2009 MAI funding for EMAs by
applying the percentage increase in MAI funding from 2008 to 2009 at
the EMA level.
We developed our estimate of fiscal year 2010 MAI funding for EMAs by
applying the percentage increase in MAI funding from 2008 to 2010 at
the EMA level.
[A] Under the stop-loss provision in H.R. 3293, an EMA is ensured that
its total formula, supplemental, and MAI grants for fiscal year 2009
would not be less than 92.4 percent of what it received for fiscal year
2006.
[B] The total funding that an EMA would receive in fiscal year 2010
with the stop-loss provision in place can be found by adding the amount
in this column to the amount in the column titled "H.R. 3293: Estimated
stop-loss."
[C] We estimate the funding needed to satisfy the H.R. 3293 stop-loss provision
for both EMAs and TGAs to be $6,083,536. However, the amount specified in
H.R. 3293 to cover the stop-loss provision is $6,021,000, a difference of
$62,536.
[End of table]
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure II:
Table 2: Total Transitional Grant Area Formula, Supplemental, and
Minority AIDS Initiative Grants for Fiscal Year 2006, Fiscal Year 2009,
and Projected Funding for Fiscal Year 2010 under Part A Funding Levels
Identified in the Report of the House Committee on Appropriations
Accompanying H.R. 3293:
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Austin, Tex.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,719,076;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,436,426;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,329,840;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,519,204;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,519,204;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,560,116.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Baton Rouge, La.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: [Empty];
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: [Empty];
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $3,911,761;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,076,689;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,076,689;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,113,182.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Bergen-Passaic, N.J.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,485,650;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,144,741;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,686,920;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,484,236;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,484,236;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,524,341.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Caguas, P.R.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $1,648,356;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $1,523,081;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $1,363,379;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $1,418,137;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $159,702;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$1,577,838;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $1,430,471.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Charlotte-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: [Empty];
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: [Empty];
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,362,616;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $5,587,907;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$5,587,907;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $5,637,621.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Cleveland, Ohio;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,349,096;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,094,565;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,466,289;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,654,743;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,654,743;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,696,212.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Denver, Colo.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,283,042;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,957,531;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $8,049,378;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $8,411,822;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$8,411,822;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $8,489,556.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Dutchess County, N.Y.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $1,367,584;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $1,263,648;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $1,365,972;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $1,422,476;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$1,422,476;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $1,435,007.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Fort Worth, Tex.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,409,819;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,150,673;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,128,320;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,310,233;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,310,233;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,349,412.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Hartford, Conn.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,666,281;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,311,644;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $3,925,802;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,093,472;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $385,842;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,479,315;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,130,073.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Indianapolis, Ind.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: [Empty];
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: [Empty];
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $3,917,484;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,088,912;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,088,912;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,126,162.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Jacksonville, Fla.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,913,816;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,540,366;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,536,454;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $5,771,055;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$5,771,055;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $5,822,477.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Jersey City, N.J.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $5,145,142;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,754,111;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,156,330;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $5,370,359;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$5,370,359;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $5,417,646.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Kansas City, Mo.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $2,916,485;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,694,832;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,576,239;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,782,134;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,782,134;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,825,967.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Las Vegas, Nev.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,323,627;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,995,031;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,005,835;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,005,835;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,005,835;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,060,917.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Memphis, Tenn.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: [Empty];
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: [Empty];
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,552,332;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,817,556;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,817,556;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,877,281.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, N.J.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $2,595,663;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,398,393;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $2,560,831;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $2,664,756;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$2,664,756;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $2,688,640.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,046,512;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,814,977;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,383,400;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $5,619,313;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$5,619,313;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $5,670,330.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Nashville, Tenn.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: [Empty];
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: [Empty];
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,425,521;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,621,449;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,621,449;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,663,632.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Norfolk, Va.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,414,760;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,079,238;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,955,970;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,208,726;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,208,726;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,264,379.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Oakland, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $5,735,837;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: v5,299,913;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,247,360;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $7,133,337;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$7,133,337;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $7,197,747.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Orange County, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,858,579;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,489,327;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $5,510,768;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,399,695;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,399,695;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,457,970.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Ponce, P.R.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $2,391,444;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,209,694;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $2,060,9414;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: v2,143,591;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $148,753;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$2,292,345;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $2,162,452.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Portland, Ore.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,401,956;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,143,407;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $3,143,407;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,104,575;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,104,575;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,143,000.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $7,074,521;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $6,536,857;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $7,428,352;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $8,551,314;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$8,551,314;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $8,630,571.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Sacramento, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $2,778,729;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,567,546;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $2,547,716;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $2,910,176;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $19,830;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$2,930,006;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $2,937,012.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): San Antonio, Tex.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $3,325,881;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $3,073,114;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $4,498,708;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $4,691,215;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$4,691,215;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $4,733,379.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): San Jose, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $2,304,762;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $2,129,600;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $2,624,926;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $3,031,684;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$3,031,684;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $3,059,273.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Santa Rosa, Calif.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $1,028,634;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $950,458;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $1,169,829;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $1,330,617;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$1,330,617;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $1,342,865.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Seattle, Wash.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $5,445,484;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $5,031,627;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $7,222,731;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $7,551,142;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$7,551,142;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $7,620,959.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): St. Louis, Mo.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $4,502,572;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $4,160,377;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $6,017,700;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $6,265,481;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$6,265,481;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $6,321,480.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, N.J.;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $849,715;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $785,137;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $822,767;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $855,056;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: 0;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$855,056;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $862,594.
Transitional Grant Area (TGA): Total;
Fiscal year 2006 funding: $97,983,023;
92.4 percent of fiscal year 2006 funding[A]: $90,536,313;
Fiscal year 2009 funding: $140,768,518;
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding before applying stop-
loss[B]: $149,896,898;
H.R. 3293: Estimated stop-loss: $714,127[C];
H.R. 3293: Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding after applying stop loss:
$150,611,025;
Estimated fiscal year 2010 funding without H.R. 3293 stop-loss
provision in place: $151,252,725.
Source: GAO analysis of HHS data, H.R. 3293, and the Report of the
House Committee on Appropriations Accompanying H.R. 3293.
Notes: The projected fiscal year 2010 funding in this table is based on
the funding amount for urban areas identified in the Report of the
House Committee on Appropriations Accompanying H.R. 3293. We assumed
that the percentage of Part A funding allotted to Eligible Metropolitan
Areas and the percentage allotted to TGAs in fiscal year 2010 would be
the same as the percentage allotted to each in fiscal year 2009.
Because updated human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome (HIV/AIDS) case counts were not available, we used the HIV/
AIDS case counts that the Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) used to determine fiscal year 2009 funding.
We cannot determine the exact effect of the stop-loss provision on
total funding for each TGA for fiscal year 2010. It is not possible to
determine exactly how each TGA would be affected by the 7.6 percent
stop-loss provision for TGAs because it is not known how HRSA will
award fiscal year 2010 supplemental and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI)
grants and because the case counts on which formula grants will be
based are not yet available.
To estimate fiscal year 2010 supplemental funding for TGAs, we
calculated the percentage of fiscal year 2009 total funding that each
area's fiscal year 2009 supplemental funding represented. We then
multiplied that percentage by the estimated total supplemental funding
to be available for distribution in fiscal year 2010. For example, if a
TGA received 2 percent of the total supplemental funding available for
distribution to TGAs in fiscal year 2009, then we estimated that area's
supplemental funding in fiscal year 2010 to be 2 percent of the amount
of supplemental funding available for distribution to TGAs.
We developed our estimate of fiscal year 2009 MAI funding for TGAs by
applying the percentage increase in MAI funding from 2008 to 2009 at
the TGA level.
We developed our estimate of fiscal year 2010 MAI funding for TGAs by
applying the percentage increase in MAI funding from 2008 to 2010 at
the TGA level.
[A] Under the stop-loss provision in H.R. 3293, a TGA is ensured that
its total formula, supplemental, and MAI grants for fiscal year 2009
would not be less than 92.4 percent of what it received for fiscal year
2006.
[B] The total funding that a TGA would receive in fiscal year 2010 with
the stop-loss provision in place can be found by adding the amount in
this column to the amount in the column titled "H.R. 3293: Estimated
stop-loss."
[C] We estimate the funding needed to satisfy the H.R. 3293 stop-loss provision
for both EMAs and TGAs to be $6,083,536. However, the amount specified in
H.R. 3293 to cover the stop-loss provision is $6,021,000, a difference of
$62,536.
[End of table]
[End of enclosure]
Enclosure III:
GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments:
For information about this letter, please contact Marcia Crosse,
Director, Health Care, who can be reached at (202) 512-7114 or
crossem@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional
Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this
letter. Major contributors to this letter were Thomas Conahan,
Assistant Director; Robert Copeland, Assistant Director; Martha Kelly,
Assistant Director; Helen Desaulniers; Rachel Svoboda; Jennifer
Whitworth; and Suzanne Worth.
[End of enclosure]
Footnotes:
[1] Pub. L. No. 101-381, 104 Stat. 576 (codified as amended at 42
U.S.C. §§ 300ff through 300ff-121). The 1990 CARE Act added title XXVI
to the Public Health Service Act. Unless otherwise indicated,
references to the CARE Act refer to current title XXVI.
[2] Pub. L. No. 109-415, 120 Stat. 2767. The CARE Act programs had
previously been reauthorized by the Ryan White CARE Act Amendments of
1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-146, 110 Stat. 1346) and the Ryan White CARE Act
Amendments of 2000 (Pub. L. No. 106-345, 114 Stat. 1319).
[3] H.R. 3293, 111th Cong. (2009). For purposes of this report, unless
otherwise specified, we use the term H.R. 3293 to refer to the bill as
passed by the House of Representatives.
[4] In this report, we use the term urban areas to refer to both EMAs
and TGAs. An EMA is a metropolitan area with a population of 50,000 or
more that had more than 2,000 AIDS cases reported in the most recent 5-
year period. The 2,000 AIDS-case criterion does not include cases of
HIV that have not progressed to AIDS. In fiscal year 2009, there were
24 EMAs according to HRSA. The RWTMA created a new program for TGAs. A
TGA is a metropolitan area with a population of 50,000 or more, which
had 1,000 to 1,999 AIDS cases reported in the most recent 5-year
period. Under this program, urban areas that were eligible for EMA
funding in fiscal year 2006 but that no longer meet the eligibility
criteria for either EMAs or TGAs maintain their eligibility for funding
and are considered TGAs until for 3 consecutive years they (1) fail to
have at least 1,000 to 1,999 AIDS cases reported in the most recent 5-
year period and (2) do not have more than 1,500 living cases of AIDS.
In fiscal year 2009, there were 32 TGAs according to HRSA.
[5] Part A of the CARE Act covers funding to urban areas. Part B covers
funding to states, territories and associated jurisdictions, and the
District of Columbia.
[6] We previously provided similar estimates for H.R. 1105. See GAO,
Ryan White CARE Act: Estimated Effect of Proposed Stop-Loss Provision
on Urban Areas, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-472R]
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 6, 2009).
[7] H.R. Rep. No. 111-220 (2009).
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Phone:
The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO‘s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO‘s Web site,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm].
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional
information.
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
