Child Fatalities from Maltreatment
National Data Could Be Strengthened
Gao ID: GAO-11-811T July 12, 2011
This testimony discusses child fatalities from maltreatment. Every year, children in the United States die after being physically abused, severely neglected, or otherwise maltreated, frequently at the hands of their parents or others who are entrusted with their care. Infants and toddlers are the most vulnerable to such abuse and neglect. According to estimates by the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), 1,770 children in the United States died from physical abuse or other forms of maltreatment in fiscal year 2009. Some experts believe that more children have died from maltreatment than are captured in this estimate and that there are inconsistencies and limitations in the data that states collect and report to NCANDS. In addition, many more children are severely harmed and may nearly die from maltreatment, but NCANDS does not collect data specifically on near-fatalities. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) maintains NCANDS, which is a voluntary state data-reporting system. HHS provides oversight of state child welfare systems, and in all states, child protective services (CPS) is part of the child welfare system. When state CPS investigators determine that a child's death is considered maltreatment under state laws or policies, CPS documents the case, and the state's child welfare department reports it to NCANDS. This testimony today is based on our July 2011 report, which is being publicly released today and addresses three issues: (1) the extent to which HHS collects and reports comprehensive information on child fatalities from maltreatment; (2) the challenges states face in collecting and reporting information on child fatalities from maltreatment to HHS; and (3) the assistance HHS provides to states in collecting and reporting data on child fatalities from maltreatment.
More children have likely died from maltreatment than are reflected in the national estimate of 1,770 child fatalities for fiscal year 2009. Undercounting is likely due to nearly half the states reporting to NCANDS data only on children already known to CPS agencies--yet not all children who die from maltreatment were previously brought to the attention of CPS. HHS encourages states to obtain information on child maltreatment fatalities from other non-CPS sources of information, but 24 states reported in our survey that their 2009 NCANDS data did not include child fatality information from any non-CPS sources. Synthesizing information about child fatalities from multiple sources--such as death certificates, state child welfare agency records, or law enforcement reports--can produce a more comprehensive picture of the extent of child deaths than sole reliance on CPS data. Furthermore, inconsistent state definitions of maltreatment, differing state legal standards for substantiating maltreatment, and missing state data can complicate the ability to obtain comprehensive information on child fatalities from maltreatment across states or over time. In addition to collecting the number of child fatality deaths, NCANDS collects data on the circumstances surrounding these deaths, which could be useful for prevention, but not all of this information is synthesized or published in HHS's annual Child Maltreatment report. Local child death investigators, such as law enforcement officials, coroners and medical examiners, and CPS staff, face several challenges in determining whether a child's death was caused by maltreatment. One challenge is that without definitive medical evidence, it can be difficult to determine that a child's death was caused by abuse or neglect rather than natural causes. State and local resource constraints can also limit investigators' ability to conduct testing, such as autopsies, to determine how a child died. Another challenge in determining cause of death is that the level of skill and training for coroners and medical examiners can vary greatly, according to the National Academy of Sciences. Child death investigators can also differ in their interpretation and application of maltreatment definitions, which can lead to inconsistent determinations of the cause of death. Finally, states reported challenges coordinating among geographic jurisdictions and with other state agencies, such as health departments, to obtain information on child fatalities from maltreatment. HHS provides ongoing assistance to states for reporting child maltreatment fatality data through an NCANDS technical assistance team that hosts an annual technical assistance meeting, provides Web-based resources, and uses an NCANDS Listserve to share information with states and facilitate peer-to-peer assistance. In addition, HHS provides assistance to states' child death review teams through the National Center for Child Death Review (NCCDR), which helps states share information by publishing their child death review teams' contact information, data, and annual reports on its Web site. In the report we released today, we recommended that the Secretary of HHS take steps to (1) further strengthen data quality, such as by identifying and sharing states' best practices and helping address differences in state definitions and interpretation of maltreatment; (2) expand available information on the circumstances surrounding child fatalities from maltreatment; (3) improve information sharing on the circumstances surrounding child fatalities from maltreatment; and (4) estimate the costs and benefits of collecting national data on near fatalities.
GAO-11-811T, Child Fatalities from Maltreatment: National Data Could Be Strengthened
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-11-811T
entitled 'Child Fatalities From Maltreatment: National Data Could Be
Strengthened' which was released on July 12, 2011.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility.
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features,
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters,
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
Testimony:
Before the Subcommittee on Human Resources, Committee on Ways and
Means, House of Representatives:
For Release on Delivery:
Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT:
Tuesday, July 12, 2011:
Child Fatalities From Maltreatment:
National Data Could Be Strengthened:
Statement of Kay E. Brown, Director:
Education, Workforce, and Income Security:
GAO-11-811T:
Chairman Davis, Ranking Member Doggett, and Members of the
Subcommittee:
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in today's discussion of
child fatalities from maltreatment. Every year, children in the United
States die after being physically abused, severely neglected, or
otherwise maltreated, frequently at the hands of their parents or
others who are entrusted with their care. Infants and toddlers are the
most vulnerable to such abuse and neglect. According to estimates by
the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), 1,770
children in the United States died from physical abuse or other forms
of maltreatment in fiscal year 2009.[Footnote 1] Some experts believe
that more children have died from maltreatment than are captured in
this estimate and that there are inconsistencies and limitations in
the data that states collect and report to NCANDS. In addition, many
more children are severely harmed and may nearly die from
maltreatment, but NCANDS does not collect data specifically on near-
fatalities. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
maintains NCANDS, which is a voluntary state data-reporting system.
[Footnote 2] HHS provides oversight of state child welfare systems,
and in all states, child protective services (CPS) is part of the
child welfare system. When state CPS investigators determine that a
child's death is considered maltreatment under state laws or policies,
CPS documents the case, and the state's child welfare department
reports it to NCANDS.
My testimony today is based on our July 2011 report, which is being
publicly released today and addresses three issues: (1) the extent to
which HHS collects and reports comprehensive information on child
fatalities from maltreatment; (2) the challenges states face in
collecting and reporting information on child fatalities from
maltreatment to HHS; and (3) the assistance HHS provides to states in
collecting and reporting data on child fatalities from maltreatment.
[Footnote 3] To address these questions, we assessed the methodology
of published research on the number of child fatalities; analyzed
fiscal year 2009 NCANDS data; and interviewed HHS officials
responsible for NCANDS child maltreatment data, child welfare
practitioners, and other experts. We also conducted a nationwide Web-
based survey of state child welfare administrators in 50 states, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico; and conducted site visits to
California, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Finally, we reviewed HHS
documents on child maltreatment fatalities and near-fatalities as well
as CAPTA and related laws, including pertinent state laws. We
conducted our work from April 2010 through July 2011 in accordance
with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient,
appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings
and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the
evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and
conclusions in this product.
The following summarizes our findings on each of the three issues
discussed in our report:
* National estimate of the number of children who likely have died
from maltreatment. More children have likely died from maltreatment
than are reflected in the national estimate of 1,770 child fatalities
for fiscal year 2009. Undercounting is likely due to nearly half the
states reporting to NCANDS data only on children already known to CPS
agencies--yet not all children who die from maltreatment were
previously brought to the attention of CPS.[Footnote 4] HHS encourages
states to obtain information on child maltreatment fatalities from
other non-CPS sources of information, but 24 states reported in our
survey that their 2009 NCANDS data did not include child fatality
information from any non-CPS sources.[Footnote 5] Synthesizing
information about child fatalities from multiple sources--such as
death certificates, state child welfare agency records, or law
enforcement reports--can produce a more comprehensive picture of the
extent of child deaths than sole reliance on CPS data. For example,
one peer-reviewed study[Footnote 6] found that more than 90 percent of
the child fatality cases could be identified by linking any two of the
data sources.[Footnote 7] Furthermore, inconsistent state definitions
of maltreatment, differing state legal standards for substantiating
maltreatment, and missing state data can complicate the ability to
obtain comprehensive information on child fatalities from maltreatment
across states or over time. In addition to collecting the number of
child fatality deaths, NCANDS collects data on the circumstances
surrounding these deaths, which could be useful for prevention, but
not all of this information is synthesized or published in HHS's
annual Child Maltreatment report. For example, for children who had
died from maltreatment, HHS's 2009 report did not provide data on
child risk factors and caregiver risk factors. When we analyzed
unpublished fiscal year 2009 state data reported to NCANDS on
children's deaths from maltreatment, we found that 16 percent of
perpetrators of fatal child maltreatment were previously involved in
an incident of child maltreatment.
* Challenges to collecting and reporting child maltreatment fatality
data to NCANDS. Local child death investigators, such as law
enforcement officials, coroners and medical examiners, and CPS staff,
face several challenges in determining whether a child's death was
caused by maltreatment. One challenge is that without definitive
medical evidence, it can be difficult to determine that a child's
death was caused by abuse or neglect rather than natural causes. In
our survey, 43 states indicated that medical issues were a challenge
in determining child maltreatment. For example, investigators in
California told us that determining the cause of death in cases such
as sudden unexplained infant death is challenging because the child
may have been intentionally suffocated, but external injuries are not
readily visible. State and local resource constraints can also limit
investigators' ability to conduct testing, such as autopsies, to
determine how a child died. Another challenge in determining cause of
death is that the level of skill and training for coroners and medical
examiners can vary greatly, according to the National Academy of
Sciences.[Footnote 8] Child death investigators can also differ in
their interpretation and application of maltreatment definitions,
which can lead to inconsistent determinations of the cause of death.
For example, law enforcement officials and coroners sometimes disagree
on the manner or cause of death when the death is suspected to be from
natural causes but there is some indication of abuse or neglect,
according to California law enforcement officials we interviewed.
Finally, states reported challenges coordinating among geographic
jurisdictions and with other state agencies, such as health
departments, to obtain information on child fatalities from
maltreatment. For example, counties face challenges obtaining medical
records and death certificates from jurisdictions in another state
when children are taken across state borders to the nearest trauma
center, according to Michigan officials.
* Assistance by HHS to help states report on child maltreatment. HHS
provides ongoing assistance to states for reporting child maltreatment
fatality data through an NCANDS technical assistance team that hosts
an annual technical assistance meeting, provides Web-based resources,
and uses an NCANDS Listserve to share information with states and
facilitate peer-to-peer assistance. States can obtain individualized
NCANDS technical assistance upon request from an assigned NCANDS
technical team liaison, and an NCANDS State Advisory Group meets
annually to review and update NCANDS collection and reporting
processes. In addition, HHS provides assistance to states' child death
review teams through the National Center for Child Death Review
(NCCDR), which helps states share information by publishing their
child death review teams' contact information, data, and annual
reports on its Web site.[Footnote 9] The NCCDR Web site also offers
best practices for preventing the leading causes of children's injury
and death and other information. NCCDR and NCANDS officials
acknowledged that, to date, they have not routinely coordinated on
child maltreatment fatality data or prevention strategies. In
responding to our survey, state officials indicated a need for
additional assistance collecting data on child fatalities and near-
fatalities from maltreatment and using this information for prevention
efforts. For example, several states mentioned that assistance with
multidisciplinary coordination could help them overcome difficulties
such as obtaining death certificates from medical examiners' or
coroner's offices. States also reported wanting assistance to collect
and use information on near fatalities, which CAPTA defines as "an act
that, as certified by a physician, places the child in serious or
critical condition," but NCANDS does not collect near fatality data.
[Footnote 10] HHS officials believe that such cases are most likely
reported generally under maltreatment, but are not specifically
identified as near fatalities, because NCANDS does not have a data
field identifying the case as a near fatality from maltreatment. In
comments on a draft of this report, HHS stated that it is considering
adding a field to identify these specific cases.
In the report we released today, we recommended, as summarized here,
that the Secretary of HHS take steps to:
* further strengthen data quality, such as by identifying and sharing
states' best practices and helping address differences in state
definitions and interpretation of maltreatment;
* expand available information on the circumstances surrounding child
fatalities from maltreatment;
* improve information sharing on the circumstances surrounding child
fatalities from maltreatment; and:
* estimate the costs and benefits of collecting national data on near
fatalities.
We provided a draft of the report we drew on for this testimony to HHS
for its review, and copies of HHS's written responses can be found in
appendix IV of that report.[Footnote 11] In its comments, HHS agreed
with our recommendations to improve the comprehensiveness and quality
of national data on child fatalities from maltreatment and pointed out
activities under way that are consistent with our recommendations.
However, more can be done to address these issues, such as by using
stronger mechanisms to routinely share information and expertise on
child fatalities from maltreatment.
Chairman Davis, Ranking Member Doggett, and Members of the
Subcommittee, this concludes my statement. I would be pleased to
respond to any questions you or other Members of the Subcommittee may
have.
GAO Contacts and Acknowledgments:
If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please
contact me at (202) 512-7215 or brownke@gao.gov. Contact points for
our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found
on the last page of this statement. Individuals who made key
contributions to this testimony include Katherine C. Berman, Lorraine
R. Ettaro, Brett S. Fallavollita, Julian P. Klazkin, Sheila R. McCoy,
Deborah A. Signer, Kate van Gelder, and Monique B. Williams. Almeta J.
Spencer provided administrative assistance.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] In this testimony, we use the term "maltreatment" to refer to both
abuse and neglect.
[2] The 1988 amendments to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment
Act (CAPTA) required HHS to establish a national data collection and
analysis program for child maltreatment data. Child Abuse Prevention,
Adoption, and Family Services Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-294, sec.
101, § 6(b)(1), 102 Stat. 102, 107.
[3] GAO, Child Maltreatment: Strengthening National Data on Child
Fatalities Could Aid in Prevention, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-599] (Washington, D.C.: July 7,
2011).
[4] NCANDS collects information on all children who were referred or
reported to CPS because of alleged maltreatment and whose maltreatment
was investigated or otherwise assessed.
[5] Since NCANDS is a voluntary data-reporting system, state CPS
agencies cannot be required to obtain information from other state
agencies, according to HHS officials.
[6] P.G. Schnitzer et al, "Public Health Surveillance of Fatal Child
Maltreatment: Analysis of 3 State Programs," American Journal of
Public Health, February 2008, Vol. 98, No. 2.
[7] HHS's most recent National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and
Neglect (NIS-4)--issued in January 2010--estimated 2,400 child deaths
from maltreatment in the study year spanning portions of 2005 and
2006. The NIS is a congressionally mandated, periodic effort of HHS to
estimate the incidence of child abuse and neglect in the United
States. 42 U.S.C. § 5105(a)(2). Unlike NCANDS, which relies primarily
on CPS data reported by states, the NIS-4 relies on multiple sources
of child death information. The small number of fatalities in the
sample size limits the reliability of the NIS estimate for child
fatalities from maltreatment. Because the sample size is small, the
estimate has a large standard error.
[8] Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences
Community, National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science
in the United States: A Path Forward. A special report prepared at the
request of the Department of Justice. Washington, D. C.: August 2009.
[9] NCCDR is a nongovernmental organization funded by HHS that
provides resources to state child death review teams. These
multidisciplinary teams review cases of child deaths for follow-up and
prevention.
[10] 42 U.S.C. § 5106a(b)(4)(A).
[11] We provided a copy of the draft report to the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and pertinent excerpts to NCCDR. DOJ and NCCDR provided
technical comments which we incorporated as appropriate.
[End of section]