HUD Needs To Better Determine Extent of Community Block Grants' Lower Income Benefits

Gao ID: RCED-83-15 November 3, 1982

GAO conducted a review to determine whether the information which the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses accurately reflects the extent to which the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program meets its legislative objective of benefiting lower income persons.

HUD has a basic responsibility for overseeing how entitled cities use their block grants and for reporting to Congress annually on block grant accomplishments. In nine cities which GAO reviewed, it found that the benefit information reported to HUD by the cities often did not accurately reflect the extent to which low- and moderate-income persons benefit from the CDBG program. Grantees used inconsistent methods of identifying and reporting lower income beneficiaries and, because of weak oversight, problems in grantee's programs were not identified or performance information was not verified. Part of the problem is the inherent difficulty in determining precisely who benefits from certain types of community development activities without conducting painstaking and expensive research. Since HUD regulations do not require cities to have income eligibility criteria for housing rehabilitation, some cities use their own income eligibility criteria, and some use other criteria, such as residence in a targeted area. GAO also found that the HUD block grant annual report to Congress does not adequately reflect actual grant benefits, a weakness which limits the report's usefulness to Congress. HUD based its report primarily on the less precise benefit estimates of planned activities rather than on actual benefits of completed activities. In addition, the annual report does not contain information on how HUD oversees and manages its block grant programs.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: John H. Luke Team: General Accounting Office: Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division Phone: (202) 275-6111


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.