Examination of Allegations Concerning the Chicago Housing Authority

Gao ID: RCED-83-144 April 28, 1983

In response to a congressional request, GAO examined three allegations concerning the Chicago Housing Authority's: (1) limiting competition in insurance contracting; (2) paying unnecessary or excessive amounts for garbage removal; and (3) not receiving full value for modernization expenditures.

GAO found that the authority limited the number of bidders when it obtained insurance bids. Further, until February 1983, the authority did not develop insurance specifications needed to encourage more price competition which may have resulted in its paying higher insurance rates than necessary. GAO found that the authority obtains available city garbage services and is improving its garbage contract management. However, the authority may not have always secured the low bidder for scavenger service due to inaccurate volume estimates. The authority had also not attempted to recoup potential overpayments to scavengers resulting from erroneous volume counts. Finally, GAO found that the authority has received over $138 million in modernization funds since 1968, of which it has spent $95 million. GAO could not readily verify that the modernization improvements were made because the authority's recordkeeping made it difficult to trace the receipt and use of goods and services. The modernization improvements were for items which were dispersed throughout the authority's projects and, in some cases, the improvements had already been vandalized.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Lowell Dodge Team: General Accounting Office: Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division Phone: (202) 512-8389


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.