Lessons Can Be Learned From Corrections' Reduction in Force Resulting From Budget Cutbacks

Gao ID: GGD-83-22 March 9, 1983

GAO reported on its review of the impact on the District of Columbia Department of Corrections of reduction in force (RIF) and budget cutbacks.

Although Corrections officials had forecast major problems in agency operations, including institutional security, as a result of the cuts, GAO found that Corrections adequately coped with the situation when the RIF was implemented. The loss and shortage of correctional officers, program personnel, equipment, and supplies disrupted operations for a while, but Corrections made the necessary adjustments over several months. However, when the hiring freeze was lifted, security staff shortages continued for more than a year because of unresolved problems between Corrections and the D.C. Office of Personnel. Corrections officials stated that there was an extraordinary slowness in the processing of personnel papers in the Office of Personnel, despite the fact that there were sufficient applicants and sufficient funds to pay them. GAO believes that the worst effect of the RIF and budget cut-backs was the lowering of staff morale. The damage was magnified because of: (1) the length of time between first knowledge of the RIF and the final listing of the individuals affected; (2) frequent changes in the number of those who would be affected; and (3) the lack of clear and reliable information available to the employees. GAO also found that Corrections and the Office of Personnel did little to help the separated correctional officers find other correctional jobs.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Arnold P. Jones Team: General Accounting Office: General Government Division Phone: (202) 512-7797


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.