Immigration

Projected Immigration Under S. 448 and Recent Trends in Legal Immigration Gao ID: PEMD-89-12 April 4, 1989

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided: (1) a projection of legal immigration between 1990 and 1999 under S. 448 and S. 358; and (2) historical data on legal immigration from the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, the Philippines, and Sweden.

GAO found that: (1) family preference immigration during the 10-year period would total about 3,240,000 under S. 448, 2,160,000 under current law, and 1,213,133 under S. 358; (2) if the family connection level increased 5 percent annually beginning in 1994, family preference immigration under S. 358 would total about 1,635,071; (3) occupational preference immigration during the period would be higher under S. 448 than under S. 358; (4) estimates for all immigration would total about 8,022,616 under S. 448, 6,203,622 under S. 358, and 6,078,616 under current law; (5) immigration under S. 448 would climb substantially if it included aliens given work rights and protection from deportation; and (6) both bills reversed the pattern under current law, in which there was more family preference immigration from the eight highest-demand countries than the remaining countries. GAO also found that: (1) historical immigration data for 1949 to 1964 reflected a quota system different from the current one of admitting up to 20,000 worldwide immigrants annually; (2) immigration for independent Western Hemisphere countries was not subject to any numerical limitations until 1968; (3) immigration from the Dominican Republic was restricted until 1961 due to its political regime; (4) U.S. laws limited immigration from the Philippines and other Asian countries until 1965; (5) military unrest in El Salvador has increased legal immigration from about 2,000 annually to more than 10,000 annually in the past 4 years; and (6) immigration from Sweden has remained less than 2,500 annually since 1949.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.