Americans With Disabilities Act

Effects of the Law on Access to Goods and Services Gao ID: PEMD-94-14AC June 21, 1994

This report, available on audio-cassette, looks at the extent to which the Americans With Disabilities Act has improved the access for persons with disabilities to goods and services provided by businesses and state and local governments. Overall, GAO found steady improvement in both accessibility and awareness during the initial 15 months that the act was in effect. However, enough areas of concern remain to suggest a need for continuing educational outreach and technical assistance to business and government agencies covered by the act, as well as continued monitoring by the Congress.

GAO found that: (1) in the 15 months after ADA took effect, businesses' compliance with accessibility standards increased from 67 percent to 74 percent; (2) the percentage of disabled persons that did not encounter certain accessibility barriers increased from 72 percent to 82 percent; (3) 71 percent of the most common remaining barriers were in the second highest priority category for removal; (4) barriers included insufficient numbers of signs useful to visually impaired persons, few assistive devices for deaf persons in hotel rooms, inaccessible bathing facilities and toilets in hotel rooms, and pay phones without text telephones or amplification systems; (5) business owners' awareness of their ADA responsibilities increased from 69 percent to 92 percent; (6) by April 1993, 45 percent of the facilities reviewed had not removed architectural barriers and 50 percent did not have any removal plans; (7) nearly all of the facilities should have had removal plans, since only one establishment was totally barrier free; (8) few facilities experienced burdens with barrier removal; and (9) the number of planned removals that did not comply with ADA guidelines increased.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.