Occupational Safety & Health

Inspectors' Opinions on Improving OSHA Effectiveness Gao ID: HRD-91-9FS November 14, 1990

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) activities, focusing on OSHA inspectors' responses to a questionnaire about: (1) OSHA enforcement; (2) safety and health standards; (3) education and training efforts; and (4) employer and worker involvement.

GAO found that OSHA inspectors: (1) lacked consensus on the effectiveness of the OSHA enforcement program and targeting policies; (2) needed more information to target enforcement efforts; (3) supported greater monetary penalties, more frequent use of instance-by-instance citations, and use of civil penalties other than fines; (4) believed that greater use of criminal sanctions would significantly reduce violations and recommended legislative and administrative changes that would allow the federal government to use criminal sanctions more effectively; (5) wanted authority to immediately remedy cases of imminent danger; (6) identified over 75 hazards not covered by specific standards which led them to occasionally cite the general duty clause; (7) wanted OSHA to improve the standard-setting process, make standards simpler to understand and enforce, and revise and update standards; (8) thought that insufficient knowledge of legislation, regulations, and standards contributed to many workplace injuries or illnesses, as well as safety and health violations; (9) thought that, although employers and workers needed more and better training, the education and training programs lacked adequate materials and were underutilized; (10) believed that mandatory safety and health programs would significantly improve safety and health in the workplace; and (11) wanted more worker involvement in OSHA enforcement activities and believed that workers needed protection against employer sanctions if they reported violations.

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.