An Evaluation of the Administration's Proposed Nuclear Non-Proliferation Strategy

Although nuclear power can lead to energy independence, it also holds the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation. In an effort to curtail such proliferation, legislation has been proposed which will exact stricter export controls and safeguards on actions affecting uranium enrichment services, reprocessing, storing of spent fuel, and disposing of radioactive nuclear wastes. Although the policy is generally constructive, some weaknesses were noted.

The Administration's proposal for overcoming problems in international safeguards does not cover nontechnical areas such as financing and ensuring implementation of the safeguards. The actions proposed for ensuring a reliable supplier posture for the United States are sound, but the decisions to use a new enrichment technology and to charge substantially higher prices could possibly work against reaching nuclear nonproliferation goals. Questions about financial and managerial arrangements for future enrichment facilities are the most important problems that could discredit the United States as a long-term supplier. If the centrifuge process does not work, it will hamper U.S. credibility. Gaining control over foreign spent fuel might be an effective way of controlling proliferation, but not until the problem of how to store it is solved.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record