Budget Formulation

Many Approaches Work but Some Improvements Are Needed Gao ID: PAD-80-31 February 29, 1980

GAO conducted a series of case studies of the budget formulation process in 10 Federal programs in the Departments of Defense, the Interior, and Health, Education, and Welfare.

The case studies revealed a variety of budget formulation styles. In some cases, budget requests were developed through "bottom-up" methods that involved field offices and no prior guidance or fixed request amounts from higher levels. In other cases, budgets were developed through "top-down" methods in which the request amount was set in advance at top levels and which entailed little or no field office work. Often, the approach followed related to the type of program, and no one approach appeared the best for all programs. Formulation weaknesses and potential problems requiring action were identified in the planning process, zero-base budgeting (ZBB) procedures, and in agencies' methods of reporting to Congress.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.