U.S. Laws and Regulations Applicable to Imports From Nonmarket Economies Could Be Improved

Gao ID: ID-81-35 September 3, 1981

Laws and regulations designed to protect U.S. industry from unfair or disruptive imports are difficult to apply to products from nonmarket, principally Communist, countries. GAO conducted a review to identify needed improvements in these laws in order to make them more effective and easier to administer.

The antidumping law stipulates that, when an economy is State-controlled to an extent that a producer's prices or costs cannot be used to determine whether dumping has occurred, a comparison price for its product is to be simulated. The simulation process leads to difficulties in selecting surrogate market producers and verifying data. The antidumping law as applied to nonmarket economies is difficult to administer, highly unpredictable in outcome, and costly for the parties involved. Relief has nevertheless been obtained under the law. The antidumping law also provides methods to suspend dumping investigations before they are completed by settlement agreements. Because of the ways in which dumping is calculated in nonmarket economy cases, it is doubtful whether some of these suspension methods could be used. The countervailing duty law of the United States provides for assessing duties to offset certain foreign subsidies on products exported to the United States. To date, the complexity of identifying and quantifying subsidies on goods from nonmarket economy countries has discouraged U.S. industries from requesting investigations of such subsidy practices. A new method of estimating subsidies makes it much easier to impose countervailing duties on nonmarket goods. The Trade Act provisions which provide additional protection from disruption caused by imports from Communist countries has been used infrequently and no relief has been granted under it. Some Government and private sector interests believe that the provisions inhibit increased trade with Communist countries.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.