El Salvador

Military Assistance Has Helped Counter but Not Overcome the Insurgency Gao ID: NSIAD-91-166 April 23, 1991

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the impact of U.S. military assistance to El Salvador, focusing on El Salvador's: (1) ability to counter insurgent forces; (2) military capabilities; and (3) attempts to instill and support respect for democracy and human rights.

GAO found that: (1) military victory eluded the Salvadoran government, since the insurgents continued to have sufficient strength and logistical support to attack economic infrastructure and military targets; (2) Salvadoran force operations were constrained, since two-thirds of the armed forces were needed to guard military installations and economic targets, and the majority of soldiers were young and inexperienced; (3) progress in negotiations between the government and the insurgents was limited to the establishment of an agenda and the signing of a human rights agreement; (4) since 1980, U.S. equipment, supplies, training, and services have improved and sustained the military capabilities of Salvadoran forces; (5) despite improvements in military capabilities, such problems as lack of coordination, poor planning, and leadership problems reduced military effectiveness; (6) problems replacing and repairing damaged and obsolete donated U.S. equipment contributed to El Salvador's difficulty in maintaining all levels of equipment; (7) although U.S. influence helped promote respect for human rights and democracy, it was unable to stop serious human rights violations; (8) the Salvadoran military promoted a greater awareness and observance of international human rights standards by providing human rights training to military personnel and establishing a human rights office; and (9) statistics indicated a decrease in political violence committed against civilians.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.