Foreign Assistance

U.S. Participation in FAO's Technical Cooperation Program Gao ID: NSIAD-94-32 January 11, 1994

Foreign governments that have received projects under the United Nation's (UN) Technical Cooperation Program are generally satisfied with the program, have found most of the projects useful, and have generated the money to expand many project activities. Nevertheless, the criteria governing the program are vague and do not reflect all of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization's goals for the program. Since the program activities GAO reviewed were not responses to urgent or unforeseen needs, the governing bodies could have programmed them in advance, along with other usual budget activities, through their established programming procedures. Programming would increase the governing bodies' influence over the distribution of program resources. GAO also found management weaknesses in the program, such as delays in hiring and buying equipment, lack of compliance with purchasing requirements, and the absence of impact evaluations. Financial management weaknesses included delaying the release of unused funds from completed projects, carrying over large amounts of unobligated program funds from one biennium to the next, and charging expenses on new projects to earlier unused appropriations. The Food and Agriculture Organization has taken some corrective measures, but the governing bodies have not required information on their results or additional corrective actions.

GAO found that: (1) many recipient governments believe that TCP projects are useful and have expressed their support for TCP programs; (2) some TCP project selection criteria lack specificity; (3) the FAO goal that TCP meet unforeseen needs is not consistently reflected in project selection criteria; (4) most TCP projects meet some criteria, but FAO lacks evidence of compliance with other criteria; (5) most TCP projects can be programmed in advance by FAO governing bodies; and (6) some TCP program and financial management practices are weak.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.