Simplifying the Federal Coal Management Program

Gao ID: EMD-81-109 August 20, 1981

GAO reviewed the Department of the Interior's regulations for the management of existing federal coal leases and preference right lease applications (PRLA's). The objective was to identify regulatory modifications that could simplify and ultimately enhance the timely and orderly development of coal on existing coal leases and PRLA's. The subjects of principal concern to GAO were: (1) the difficulties in implementing requirements for maximum economic recovery (MER); (2) the regulatory requirements for diligent development; (3) the designation of leases as logical mining units (LMU's); (4) duplication of effort in environmental review of coal mine plans; and (5) the lack of data needed to meet regulatory requirements for processing PRLA's.

GAO found that: (1) the existing and proposed regulations on MER were unnecessarily burdensome and almost impossible to administer; (2) the lack of flexibility in regulations directed at achieving more diligent development of existing federal coal leases could be adversely affecting certain leases; (3) many of the leases designated as LMU's do not qualify as such, and the Interior authority for making these designations is questionable; (4) in some instances, the mine plan review process was being reviewed by more than one organization, resulting in duplicate documents; and (5) the processing of many leases could be expedited by waiving certain regulations that were not in effect at the time the lease applications were submitted.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.