Repeal of Unneeded Outer Continental Shelf Production Rate-Setting Functions Would Cut Costs

Gao ID: EMD-82-97 September 10, 1982

GAO initiated this report to determine whether there are opportunities to save money or better utilize resources within the Department of the Interior by eliminating unneeded statutory and other reporting requirements involving the production of oil and gas from federal leases on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

GAO found that, under authority of the OCS Lands Act of 1953 and the OCS Lands Act Amendments of 1978, Interior requires operators of OCS leases to provide various information regarding the rate at which oil and gas can and will be produced. The three different rates currently compiled by Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS) are: (1) the maximum production rate (MPR); (2) the maximum efficient rate (MER); and (3) the maximum attainable rate (MAR). Most of Interior's rate-setting effort is not useful or necessary and could be curtailed. Although exact figures are not available, the costs on the part of both MMS and industry to collect and report on the production rates are significant. MMS is currently considering revisions to regulations which would eliminate MER for nonsensitive reservoirs. GAO believes MMS could probably eliminate MER entirely and use MPR data to monitor sensitive reservoirs. In addition, MMS officials agree that MAR is not necessary, since the information needed on OCS production capabilities can be provided through the data supporting MPR. However, since MAR is required by statute, legislative relief by Congress is required before it can be discontinued.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Michael Gryszkowiec Team: General Accounting Office: Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division Phone: (202) 275-7756


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.