Federal Land Management

Nonfederal Land and Mineral Rights Could Impact Future Wilderness Areas Gao ID: RCED-87-131 June 30, 1987

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the potential problems facing Congress in creating Bureau of Land Management (BLM) wilderness areas containing privately or state-owned land and mineral rights, focusing on the: (1) extent of nonfederal land and mineral rights in BLM wilderness study areas; (2) difficulties that BLM experienced due to nonfederal land and mineral rights in areas that Congress designated as wilderness; and (3) data that BLM is developing on nonfederal land and mineral rights to assist Congress in designating wilderness areas.

GAO found that: (1) about 455 of 860 BLM wilderness study areas contain privately or state-owned land and minerals that could be developed; (2) BLM assessed the mineral development potential in 374 study areas and estimated that some type of mineral development could occur in about 179 areas; (3) BLM will face the task of protecting the areas' wilderness characteristics without infringing upon the owners' property rights if development occurs in those areas; (4) BLM instructed its state offices to exclude, where possible, nonfederal lands when drawing the boundaries of the areas it will study and recommend for wilderness designation; and (5) BLM acknowledged that some areas recommended for wilderness designation will include nonfederal land and mineral rights because they are essential to the overall character of the proposed wilderness area. GAO also found that: (1) BLM wilderness coordinators in Arizona, New Mexico, and California expressed concern that Congress may designate wilderness areas before BLM completes its study process or expand the boundaries of its recommended wilderness areas, which could result in the need for BLM to acquire the land to prevent development; (2) BLM instructed its state offices to include information on the extent, development potential, and possible acquisition costs of nonfederal land in the documentation supporting BLM wilderness recommendations; (3) BLM information on state-owned land appeared to be accurate; and (4) BLM officials agreed to correct the deficiencies in its information on privately owned land.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.