Financial Management

Improvements Needed in OSMRE's Method of Allocating Obligations Gao ID: AFMD-89-89 July 28, 1989

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the propriety of the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement's (OSMRE) fiscal years (FY) 1987 and 1988 charges to the Abandoned Mine Reclamation (AML) Fund.

GAO found that OSMRE charged its two primary appropriation accounts, the AML fund and a regulation and technology program, by dividing its obligations into direct regulation and technology activities, direct AML activities, and administrative activities. GAO also found that, although a review of sample transactions indicated that OSMRE charged the appropriate appropriation accounts, it did not use supportable methodologies to make those allocations, since it: (1) accumulated administrative-related obligations throughout the year in various accounts and then allocated them at yearend based on the approved budget; (2) decided at the beginning of the year the portion of each of certain invoices it would charge to each account through the year; and (3) lacked documentation to support its allocation of some obligations to the AML fund. GAO believes that, while the OSMRE accounting system has the capability to properly account for and allocate its two programs' obligations, OSMRE instead uses a methodology which allows its budget to become a self-fulfilling prophecy and impedes congressional and agency oversight of its activities.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.