Land Management Agencies

Information on Selected Administrative Policies and Practices Gao ID: RCED-97-40 February 11, 1997

The federal government owns and manages about 650 million acres of land in the United States--more than one quarter of the nation's total land area. Ninety-six percent of the federal land is managed by four agencies: the National Park Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Forest Service. In fiscal year 1995, the four agencies employed more than 75,000 full-time equivalent employees. Combined, the agencies received new budget authority in excess of $8 billion. They provide some of their employees with rental housing, authority to use the agencies' vehicles, and allowances to buy uniforms. The agencies also encourage and pay for some employees to move to different geographic locations during their careers. This report compares the four agencies' policies and practices relating to (1) the reasons for and the costs of field-unit managers' geographic relocations; (2) the authorization for and the quantity and condition of employees' rental housing; (3) the requirements for providing employees' uniforms and expenditures for them; and (4) the authorizations for employees' home-to-work travel in agency vehicles. GAO also compares the processes by which BLM and the Forest Service issue grazing permits and highlights the similarities and differences between the two agencies' grazing programs.

GAO found that: (1) only the Forest Service has written policies expressing the value and necessity of relocating employees if they hold or aspire to hold managerial positions; (2) however, the importance of relocating employees is an unwritten tenet of the other three agencies' culture; (3) according to the four agencies' managers, relocations are encouraged because they allow employees to gain experience by working in different geographic areas and with different kinds of people and because relocations also infuse agencies' units with fresh ideas; (4) during October 1, 1991, through June 30, 1996, the four agencies reported spending about $8.4 million to relocate about 380 managers; (5) federal law authorizes agencies to grant housing to employees who must live on the land to provide services or protect property or to grant housing if it is not available within a reasonable commuting distance; (6) the four agencies' policies follow these criteria; (7) according to a database of the government's rental housing maintained by the Bureau of Reclamation, the four agencies had 11,464 housing units, ranging from houses to tents, as of January 1997; (8) all four agencies believe that their employees should be easily identified, and all four have policies requiring or authorizing employees to wear uniforms; (9) for fiscal year 1995, the four agencies reported spending about $8.6 million on uniforms for about 44,000 employees; (10) federal regulations limit the use of agencies' vehicles for home-to-work travel to high-level officials, employees engaged in field work, and other employees in specific circumstances; (11) the agencies' policies specify that only their Department's Secretary may authorize the use of an agency's vehicles for home-to-work travel and that such authorizations must be based on the increased efficiency and economy of government operations; (12) in practice, the three Interior agencies have authorized home-to work use of their vehicles for law enforcement personnel predominantly, although the agencies have also authorized such use for emergencies or travel to multiple locations during a day's work; and (13) the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service follow similar processes in issuing permits to ranchers to graze their livestock on federal lands, and both agencies charge the same grazing fees according to a formula set forth in law; however, differences exist in the two programs' authorizing legislation, requirements regarding the ownership of the land and livestock, and conditions for transferring grazing privileges.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.