Better Cash Management Can Reduce the Cost of the National Direct Student Loan Program

Gao ID: FGMSD-80-5 November 27, 1979

The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW), through its Office of Education (OE), sponsors three student financial aid programs, one of which is the National Direct Student Loan program. This program provides funds to postsecondary schools for making long-term, low-interest loans to students. Before 1970, OE monitored all aspects of the program including the disbursement of funds to schools and the reasonableness of school balances. Since 1970, when HEW transferred disbursing responsibilities to its federal assistance financing system, OE has not actively monitored the schools' cash balances.

Schools participating in the loan program have been allowed to hold an annual average of over $63 million in federal funds in excess of their 30-day needs. GAO estimated that if the Treasury had this money, it could save the government interest costs as much as $4 million annually. Although OE encourages schools to invest the excess funds in short-term securities, many schools have not done this. Such investments would help offset the government's cost of borrowing, and their earnings would reduce the government's expenditures for the program. Because organizational responsibility for cash management has not been clarified, neither OE nor the departmental federal assistance financing system has an adequate system to effectively monitor school balances. Furthermore, the system does not have controls to prevent schools from obtaining more federal funds than are needed for current program operations. OE believes that returning excess funds would jeopardize many school loan programs because additional funds might not be available until the next fiscal year if the school underestimates its needs. GAO believes that the program must be flexible enough to provide for such a shortage, but that this can be done while still saving the government interest costs.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.