A New Approach to the Public Debt Legislation Should Be Considered

Gao ID: FGMSD-79-58 September 7, 1979

Congress has attempted to control the size of the public debt over the last several years by authorizing only temporary debt increases which expired in a year or less. Based on statements in congressional documents, this method was considered advantageous because it allowed Congress to increase the debt limit and later change it as more accurate data on receipts, disbursements, and required borrowing became available. Congressional desire to control the public debt has merit. However, any advantages that may have been achieved by employing the temporary increase process are being offset by the costs and undesirable conditions that develop when extensions of the temporary increase are delayed.

Because circumstances change, however, there is no guarantee that another delay will not have a greater impact. Enacting new legislation before the current temporary ceiling increase expires on September 30 is critical because historically, October has been one of the Government's largest deficit-spending months. In addition to being an obstacle to the Department of the Treasury's borrowing program, the temporary ceiling increase concept has lost its meaning in recent years. The temporary increase has grown to a point where it exceeds the permanent ceiling, and has limited prospects for reduction in the immediate future. Finally, the implementation of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 has brought into question the need for Congress to consider the debt ceiling separately from the budget process. It seems that the two processes can be consolidated without diluting Congressional control over the public debt.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.