The Comptroller of the Currency Should Decide the Extent to Which His Action Control System Is Needed

Gao ID: GGD-81-93 September 28, 1981

As part of its study of changes in bank supervision since 1976, GAO reviewed the Action Control System (ACS) of the National Bank Surveillance System under the supervision of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The review consisted of an overall study of supervisory changes and a review of selected cases of banks requiring special supervisory attention to determine how ACS was used.

In its review, GAO found that ACS was not meeting its objective of assuring uniform, timely action by OCC for banks deserving supervisory attention. OCC never made an adequate study of how best to solve its perceived problem and, consequently, the ACS design was faulty. As a result, neither regional nor headquarters personnel fully use the system. According to the Action Control Improvement Committee, ACS is receiving limited use because its output is not in a format usable to readers. Additionally, officials at other regulatory agencies question the need for a computerized system to monitor their banks which are of supervisory concern since each bank is already closely monitored. GAO believes that a primary cause of the problems of ACS was the lack of an adequate system justification study before ACS was developed. Moreover, since some OCC regions and other banking agencies question the need of a computerized system to insure adequate followup, the system may not be the right system to fulfill the need of a standardized monitoring system.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Arthur R. Goldbeck Team: General Accounting Office: General Government Division Phone: (202) 275-3641


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.