Foreign Investment

Critique of Treasury Report on Major Industrial Country Restrictions Gao ID: NSIAD-89-234 September 21, 1989

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO: (1) reviewed a Department of the Treasury survey of the Group of Seven (G-7) countries' laws and regulations governing foreign direct investment; and (2) compared the provisions of S. 289, proposed legislation for detailed reporting by foreign investors, to the G-7 countries' reporting and disclosure requirements.

GAO found that the Treasury report: (1) accurately described the laws and regulations that the G-7 countries used to govern foreign direct investment inflows; (2) provided background information relating to pending legislation for formal U.S. requirements governing foreign direct investments in the United States; (3) did not attempt to catalog cultural or institutional impediments to foreign direct investments or include discussions of trade-related investment measures; and (4) did not have the specific data elements that foreign governments required as part of their formal investment processes to provide a basis for comparison to the proposed legislation. GAO also found that: (1) although Japan, Canada, and France recently liberalized their formal requirements, institutional and cultural impediments faced U.S. investors; (2) the proposed legislation would provide detailed reporting by foreign investors, including establishment of a registry for foreign direct investment and access to data for authorized officials; (3) West Germany, Italy, and Canada had no registries, while France maintained a registry, but kept it closely within its government; (4) Canada monitored investments and published a list of foreign direct investments, but did not include financial or sensitive information; and (5) Japan monitored foreign direct investments, made limited information available on individual transactions unless the parties involved requested confidentiality, and included foreign corporations in a publicly available list.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.