Financial Management

USDA Faces Major Financial Management Challenges Gao ID: T-AIMD-00-115 March 21, 2000

As shown by the Inspector General's sixth disclaimer in a row on the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) consolidated financial statements, USDA continues to have serious problems in accounting for hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and budgetary resources. Before the agency can achieve financial accountability, it must overcome a host of serious financial management deficiencies cited by GAO and USDA's Office of Inspector General. This testimony focuses on problems USDA has experienced in the following five areas: (1) implementing the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 and related accounting standards, (2) reconciling its fund balance with Treasury accounts, (3) addressing weaknesses in the Forest Service's financial accounting and reporting, (4) correcting other material internal control weaknesses, and (5) complying with key laws and regulations. GAO also assesses the Rural Utilities Service's electric loan program policies and procedures and the government's vulnerability to losses from direct loans or guarantees that the Service made to electric cooperatives.

GAO noted that: (1) FCRA and the related accounting standards were enacted to more accurately measure the government's costs of federal loan programs and to permit better comparisons both among credit programs and between credit and noncredit programs; (2) since 1994, the Inspector General (IG) has reported material weaknesses in the processes and procedures used by USDA's lending agencies to estimate and reestimate loan subsidy costs; (3) the USDA Chief Financial Officer established a task force in March 1999 to assist in resolving the agency's credit reform problems; (4) to date, USDA has not provided the resources needed to properly address its credit reform problems; (5) the IG was unable to fully substantiate the Fund Balance accounts with U.S. Treasury because USDA had not reconciled the balance with the amount reported by Treasury; (6) prior to 1999, USDA merely adjusted its records to agree with Treasury's; (7) since 1999, USDA discontinued adjusting its records to agree with Treasury's and began disclosing any differences in its reports to Treasury; (8) USDA formed a task force to resolve outstanding differences and develop procedures that will prevent the reconciliation problems from recurring in the future; (9) since the first audit of the Forest Service's financial statements, USDA's IG has found serious accounting and financial reporting weaknesses; (10) the Forest Service has completed several actions and begun others that, if successfully carried through, represent important steps toward achieving financial accountability; (11) at USDA, several persistent internal control weaknesses contributed to the IG's inability to form an opinion on USDA's fiscal year 1999 consolidated financial statements; and (12) the IG reported instances in which USDA was not complying with federal regulations, including: (a) component agencies' failure to comply with the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act; (b) lending agencies' failure to comply with provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act; and (c) USDA's failure to comply with the Chief Financial Officer Act.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.