Commodity Exchange Act

Issues Related to the Regulation of Electronic Trading Systems Gao ID: GGD-00-99 May 5, 2000

New technology has resulted in the development and the use of electronic systems that are changing the way that derivatives are traded. Although these systems have benefitted the derivatives markets and their participants, they have also raised regulatory concerns, including questions about the appropriate regulation of electronic trading systems for exchange-traded futures and over-the-counter derivatives. This report answers the following questions: How is technology being used in the exchange-trade futures market, and what concerns does this raise under the Commodity Exchange Act? How is technology being used in the over-the-counter derivatives market, and what concerns does this raise under the Act? What alternatives have been suggested to address the concerns raised under the Act by the use of technology in the exchange-traded futures and over-the-counter derivatives markets?

GAO noted that: (1) automated order routing systems (AORS) have been used for over 10 years to route orders from futures commission merchants (FCM) to and within futures exchanges; (2) AORS can now transmit orders from the customer's computer to FCM's computer, and then to the exchange for execution; (3) to the extent that AORS provide for enhanced trade monitoring and control, more precise trading records, and more direct market access, their use can benefit the exchange-traded futures market and its participants and can reduce some regulatory concerns; (4) nonetheless, according to some futures market participants, the use of AORS without adequate controls can also raise regulatory concerns about the adequacy of system capacity and security as well as opportunities to engage in unauthorized trading; (5) electronic trade-matching systems are being used in place of or in addition to open outcry to execute orders; (6) similar to AORS, electronic trade-matching systems can offer many benefits and reduce some regulatory concerns; (7) electronic trading systems for OTC derivatives more directly link buyers to sellers that previously interacted through telephones and faxes; (8) to the extent that these systems enhance trader monitoring and control and interface with risk management software, they can reduce both firm-specific and systemic risk; (9) to the extent that these systems link multiple participants and transmit contract execution details electronically, they can improve market transparency and reduce the time and cost of trade execution and reporting; (10) nonetheless, without adequate controls, these systems can raise concerns about inadequate system security and unauthorized customer trading; (11) general agreement exists among regulators and market participants that the approach to regulation needs to be revised to better accommodate electronic trading systems for exchange-traded futures and OTC derivatives; and (12) market participants have suggested three approaches for accomplishing this objective: (a) drafting a separate section of the CEA to deal with electronic trading; (b) developing core principles to which all electronic trading systems must adhere; and (c) developing a flexible regulatory structure under which electronic systems are regulated based on the extent to which they raise specific public policy concerns under the CEA.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.