Small Businesses
Tax Compliance Benefits and Opportunities to Mitigate Costs on Third Parties of Miscellaneous Income Reporting Requirements
Gao ID: GAO-11-218T November 18, 2010
Third parties, often businesses, reported more than $6 trillion in miscellaneous income payments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in tax year 2006 on Form 1099-MISC. Payees are to report this income on their tax returns. It has been long known that if these payments are not reported on 1099-MISCs, it is less likely that they will be reported on payee tax returns. In 2010, the reporting requirements were expanded to cover payments for goods and payments to corporations, both previously exempt, beginning in 2012. This testimony summarizes recent GAO reports and provides information on (1) benefits of the current requirements in terms of improved compliance by taxpayers and reduced taxpayer recordkeeping, (2) costs to the third-party businesses of the current 1099-MISC reporting requirement, and (3) options for mitigating the reporting burden for third-party businesses. GAO has not assessed the expansion of 1099-MISC reporting to payments for goods.
Information reporting is a powerful tool for encouraging voluntary compliance by payees and helping IRS detect underreported income. Also, information reporting may sometimes reduce taxpayers' costs of preparing their tax returns, although by how much is not known. IRS estimated that $68 billion of the annual $345 billion gross tax gap for 2001, the most current available estimate, was caused by sole proprietors underreporting their net business income. A key reason for this noncompliance was that sole proprietors were not subject to tax withholding and only a portion of their net business income was reported to IRS by third parties. The benefits from information reporting are affected by payers' compliance with reporting requirements and IRS's ability to use the information in its process that matches third-party data with tax returns. However, IRS does not have estimates of the number or characteristics of payers that fail to submit 1099-MISCs as required. To improve its use of 1099-MISC information, IRS has collected data to help identify ways to refine its matching process and select the most productive cases for review, as GAO recommended in 2009. Current 1099-MISC requirements impose costs on the third parties required to file them. The magnitude of these costs is not easily estimated because payers generally do not track these costs separate from other accounting costs. In nongeneralizable case studies conducted in 2007 with four payers and five vendors that file information returns on behalf of their clients, GAO was told that existing information return costs were relatively low. One small business employing under five people told GAO of possibly spending 3 to 5 hours per year filing Form 1099 information returns manually, using an accounting package to gather the information. Two vendors reported prices for preparing and filing Forms 1099 of about $10 per form for 5 forms to about $2 per form for 100 forms, with one charging about $0.80 per form for 100,000 forms. However, these prices did not include clients' recordkeeping costs. Payers face a variety of impediments preparing and submitting 1099-MISC forms, including complex rules and an inconvenient submission process. For example, payers must determine whether payees are incorporated, must get the payees' taxpayer identification number, and must use special forms if filing on paper. A variety of options exist for mitigating the costs of filing Form 1099-MISC. Most have pros and cons. IRS has already exempted payments, including those paid by credit card, which will be reported to IRS by other means. Other options include improving IRS guidance and education; adding a check-the-box question to business tax forms that would force return preparers to ask their clients whether they have complied with 1099-MISC reporting requirements; waiving late submission penalties for first-time payers; raising the payment reporting threshold; initially limiting the types of payments covered; having IRS develop an online filing capability; and allowing paper filers to submit computer-generated black and white 1099-MISCs rather than IRS's printed forms. GAO is not making new recommendations in this testimony. In 2009, GAO suggested that Congress consider requiring payers to report service payments to corporations. GAO did not study reporting of payments for goods. Other prior GAO recommendations included ways for IRS to improve its use of 1099-MISC information received. IRS agreed with six of eight recommendations and is taking action to address them.
GAO-11-218T, Small Businesses: Tax Compliance Benefits and Opportunities to Mitigate Costs on Third Parties of Miscellaneous Income Reporting Requirements
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-11-218T
entitled 'Small Businesses: Tax Compliance Benefits and Opportunities
to Mitigate Costs on Third Parties of Miscellaneous Income Reporting
Requirements' which was released on November 18, 2010.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility.
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features,
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters,
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
Testimony before the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship,
U.S. Senate:
For Release on Delivery:
Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST:
Thursday, November 18, 2010:
Small Businesses:
Tax Compliance Benefits and Opportunities to Mitigate Costs on Third
Parties of Miscellaneous Income Reporting Requirements:
Statement of James R. White, Director:
Strategic Issues:
GAO-11-218T:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-11-218T, a testimony before the Committee on Small
Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate.
Why GAO Did This Study:
Third parties, often businesses, reported more than $6 trillion in
miscellaneous income payments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in
tax year 2006 on Form 1099-MISC. Payees are to report this income on
their tax returns. It has been long known that if these payments are
not reported on 1099-MISCs, it is less likely that they will be
reported on payee tax returns. In 2010, the reporting requirements
were expanded to cover payments for goods and payments to
corporations, both previously exempt, beginning in 2012.
This testimony summarizes recent GAO reports and provides information
on (1) benefits of the current requirements in terms of improved
compliance by taxpayers and reduced taxpayer recordkeeping, (2) costs
to the third-party businesses of the current 1099-MISC reporting
requirement, and (3) options for mitigating the reporting burden for
third-party businesses. GAO has not assessed the expansion of 1099-
MISC reporting to payments for goods.
What GAO Found:
Information reporting is a powerful tool for encouraging voluntary
compliance by payees and helping IRS detect underreported income.
Also, information reporting may sometimes reduce taxpayers‘ costs of
preparing their tax returns, although by how much is not known. IRS
estimated that $68 billion of the annual $345 billion gross tax gap
for 2001, the most current available estimate, was caused by sole
proprietors underreporting their net business income. A key reason for
this noncompliance was that sole proprietors were not subject to tax
withholding and only a portion of their net business income was
reported to IRS by third parties. The benefits from information
reporting are affected by payers‘ compliance with reporting
requirements and IRS‘s ability to use the information in its process
that matches third-party data with tax returns. However, IRS does not
have estimates of the number or characteristics of payers that fail to
submit 1099-MISCs as required. To improve its use of 1099-MISC
information, IRS has collected data to help identify ways to refine
its matching process and select the most productive cases for review,
as GAO recommended in 2009.
Current 1099-MISC requirements impose costs on the third parties
required to file them. The magnitude of these costs is not easily
estimated because payers generally do not track these costs separate
from other accounting costs. In nongeneralizable case studies
conducted in 2007 with four payers and five vendors that file
information returns on behalf of their clients, GAO was told that
existing information return costs were relatively low. One small
business employing under five people told GAO of possibly spending 3
to 5 hours per year filing Form 1099 information returns manually,
using an accounting package to gather the information. Two vendors
reported prices for preparing and filing Forms 1099 of about $10 per
form for 5 forms to about $2 per form for 100 forms, with one charging
about $0.80 per form for 100,000 forms. However, these prices did not
include clients‘ recordkeeping costs. Payers face a variety of
impediments preparing and submitting 1099-MISC forms, including
complex rules and an inconvenient submission process. For example,
payers must determine whether payees are incorporated, must get the
payees‘ taxpayer identification number, and must use special forms if
filing on paper.
A variety of options exist for mitigating the costs of filing Form
1099-MISC. Most have pros and cons. IRS has already exempted payments,
including those paid by credit card, which will be reported to IRS by
other means. Other options include improving IRS guidance and
education; adding a check-the-box question to business tax forms that
would force return preparers to ask their clients whether they have
complied with 1099-MISC reporting requirements; waiving late
submission penalties for first-time payers; raising the payment
reporting threshold; initially limiting the types of payments covered;
having IRS develop an online filing capability; and allowing paper
filers to submit computer-generated black and white 1099-MISCs rather
than IRS‘s printed forms.
What GAO Recommends:
GAO is not making new recommendations in this testimony. In 2009, GAO
suggested that Congress consider requiring payers to report service
payments to corporations. GAO did not study reporting of payments for
goods. Other prior GAO recommendations included ways for IRS to
improve its use of 1099-MISC information received. IRS agreed with six
of eight recommendations and is taking action to address them.
View [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-218T] or key
components. For more information, contact James R. White, at (202) 512-
9110 or whitej@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Madam Chairwoman and Members of the Committee:
I am pleased to be here today to discuss the effects on small
businesses of filing third-party information returns with the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) reporting various payments. Payees are
responsible for reporting payments they received from the third-party
payers as income on their tax returns. This income is labeled
miscellaneous income and reported by the third parties on Form 1099-
MISC. IRS matches the third-party information returns with payees' tax
returns to ensure that payees are accurately reporting their income
and paying any tax. Third parties reported more than $6 trillion in
payments for tax year 2006 on Forms 1099-MISC.
Information reporting by third parties is a proven approach for
improving taxpayer compliance with the tax laws and for minimizing
taxpayers' costs of complying. However, such reporting imposes a cost
on the third parties. Consequently, there is a trade-off. Our tax
system shifts some of the costs of tax administration to the third
parties and gains improved compliance and reduced compliance costs for
taxpayers.
This trade-off is illustrated by the requirement for additional
reporting of miscellaneous income. Section 9006 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act[Footnote 1] requires expanded
information reporting to include payments to corporations and payments
of amounts in consideration of property and gross proceeds. For
payments after December 31, 2011, every person engaged in a trade or
business would be required to file a Form 1099-MISC reporting
aggregate annual payments of more than $600 to any individual or
corporate payee for the purchase of goods or services.[Footnote 2]
Currently, information reporting is only required for payments for
services and only to payees who are not incorporated. Concerns have
been expressed about the costs that the additional reporting will
impose on businesses. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that
eliminating the new requirement would result in revenue loss of
approximately $19 billion from 2012 to 2020 from increased taxpayer
noncompliance.
In 2009, we suggested that Congress consider requiring payers to
report service payments to corporations on the Form 1099-MISC, but we
have not assessed or recommended expanding 1099-MISC reporting to
payments for goods.[Footnote 3] As early as 1991, we determined that
the benefits in terms of increased tax revenue and voluntary taxpayer
compliance would exceed the costs of extending 1099-MISC reporting to
corporate payments.[Footnote 4] IRS agreed that the benefits of
eliminating the corporate exemption for service payments outweigh the
costs, and the Bush Administration had proposed legislation extending
the reporting requirements to service payments to corporations. The
Obama Administration had similar proposals in its fiscal year 2010 and
2011 budget requests.[Footnote 5]
Because of the debate about the cost imposed by the new requirement,
you asked us to summarize our prior reports on what is known about the
costs and compliance benefits of information reporting, particularly
1099-MISC reporting.[Footnote 6] More specifically, our objectives are
to describe (1) what is known about the benefits of the current
requirements in terms of both improved compliance by taxpayers and
reduced taxpayer recordkeeping and other costs, (2) what is known
about the costs to the third-party businesses of the current 1099-MISC
reporting requirement, and (3) what opportunities are available to
mitigate the reporting burden for third-party businesses. The reports
we summarize in this statement did not assess the expansion of 1099-
MISC reporting to payments for goods.
My testimony today is based on three reports on information reporting
by third parties. We used multiple methodologies to develop our
findings for these reports. We conducted structured interviews with
four organizations volunteered through International Accounts Payable
Professionals or the National Federation of Independent Businesses, an
organization of small businesses that was on record as finding the
information reporting proposals we studied to be troublesome to small
businesses. We also selected five companies from lists of vendors, IRS-
approved electronic filers, and Information Reporting Program Advisory
Committee members, enough to include representatives of software
vendors, service bureaus, and return preparers and cover a sizable
percentage of all information returns. These nine case studies provide
examples of costs related to 1099s, including 1099-MISCs, but are not
representative of the general population of payers and are not to be
generalized. We interviewed IRS officials and members of IRS advisory
groups, tax professionals, and tax software and information return
filing vendors to identify impediments facing payers in preparing and
submitting 1099-MISCs. In addition, we reviewed IRS documents and
compliance data. We conducted our work for these three reports in
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. A
more detailed discussion of scope and methodology is available in each
of the three reports.
Background:
As we reported in 2009, more than 5 million third parties submitted
more than 82 million miscellaneous income information forms (Form 1099-
MISC) to the IRS reporting more than $6 trillion in payments for tax
year 2006. Third-party payers are businesses, governmental units, and
other organizations that make payments to other businesses or
individuals. Payers must submit payment information on 1099-MISCs to
IRS when they make a variety of payments labeled miscellaneous income.
Payees, or those being compensated, are required to report the
payments on their income tax returns.
The types of payments reportable on a Form 1099-MISC--shown in figure
1--and their reporting thresholds vary widely. Under existing law,
information reporting is required for payments by persons engaged in a
trade or business to nonemployees for services of $600 or more (called
nonemployee compensation), royalty payments of $10 or more, and
medical and health care payments made to physicians or other suppliers
(including payments by insurers) of $600 or more. However, personal
payments, such as a payment by a homeowner to a contractor to paint
his or her personal residence, are not required to be reported because
these payments are not made in the course of a payer's trade or
business. Existing regulations also exempt certain payments to a
corporation, payments for merchandise, wages paid to employees, and
payments of rent to real estate agents.[Footnote 7] The expansion of
information reporting to payments to corporations and for merchandise
will apply to payments made after December 31, 2011.
Figure 1: Form 1099-MISC, Tax Year 2010:
[Refer to PDF for image: illustration]
Source: IRS.
Note: The 2010 form reflects current law in effect and does not
include reporting on payments for goods.
[End of figure]
Payers must provide 1099-MISC statements to payees by the end of
January. Payers submitting fewer than 250 1099-MISCs may submit paper
forms, which are due to IRS by the end of February. Payers submitting
paper 1099-MISCs are required to use IRS's official forms or
substitute forms with special red ink readable by IRS's scanning
equipment.[Footnote 8] Photocopies and copies of the 1099-MISC form
downloaded from the Internet or generated from software packages in
black ink do not conform to IRS processing specifications. Payers
submitting 250 or more 1099-MISCs are required by IRS to submit the
forms electronically.[Footnote 9] Most 1099-MISCs for tax year 2006
were submitted electronically. However, most payers submitted small
numbers of 1099-MISCs, and most payers submitted paper 1099-MISCs.
By matching 1099-MISCs received from payers with what payees report on
their tax returns, IRS can detect underreporting of income including
failure to file a tax return. Figure 2 shows the automated process IRS
uses to detect mismatches between nonemployee compensation and other
payments reported on 1099-MISCs and payees' income tax returns. The
Nonfiler program handles cases where no income tax return was filed by
a 1099-MISC payee. The Automated Underreporter (AUR) program handles
cases where a payee filed a tax return but underreported 1099-MISC
payments. AUR's case inventory includes payee mismatches over a
certain threshold, and IRS has a methodology using historical data to
select cases for review. AUR reviewers manually screen the selected
cases to determine whether the discrepancy can be resolved without
taxpayer contact. For the remaining cases selected, IRS sends notices
asking the payee to explain discrepancies or pay any additional taxes
assessed.
Figure 2: Matching 1099-MISC Reportable Nonemployee Compensation
Information with Individual Tax Returns:
[Refer to PDF for image: illustration]
Central Coast Kite Shop:
Payer pays $600 to payee for services;
Payer submits 1099-MISC to IRS;
Payer sends 1099-MISC copy to payee.
Payee reports income including 1099-MISC payments on applicable tax
forms:
Form 1040;
1040 Schedule SE;
1040 Schedule C;
1040 Schedule E;
1040 Schedule F.
Payee files forms to IRS.
IRS compares information across forms:
If income discrepancy is detected:
AUR program;
IRS sends notice to taxpayer.
If payer‘s 1099-MISC is present, but no tax return filed by payee:
Non-filer program;
IRS sends notice to taxpayer.
Source: GAO analysis of IRS information.
[End of figure]
1099-MISC Information Reporting Increases Voluntary Taxpayer
Compliance, Reduces the Cost and Intrusiveness of IRS Compliance
Programs, and May Reduce Payees' Costs of Preparing Their Tax Returns:
Third-party information reporting is widely acknowledged to increase
voluntary tax compliance in part because taxpayers know that IRS is
aware of their income. As shown in figure 3, voluntary reporting
compliance is substantially higher for income subject to withholding
or information reporting than for other income. For example, for wages
and salaries, which are subject to withholding and substantial
information reporting, taxpayers have consistently misreported an
estimated 1 percent of their income. For income with little or no
information reporting, the tax year 2001 estimated percentage was
about 54 percent. IRS has long recognized that if payments made to
businesses are not reported on 1099-MISCs, it is less likely that they
will be reported on payee tax returns.
Figure 3: Individual Net Income Misreporting Categorized by the Extent
of Income Subject to Withholding and Information Reporting, Tax Year
2001:
[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph]
Substantial information reporting and withholding:
* Wages and salaries;
Percentage of net income misreported: 1.2%.
Substantial information reporting:
* Pensions and annuities;
* Dividend income;
* Interest income;
* Unemployment compensation;
* Social Security benefits;
Percentage of net income misreported: 4.5%.
Some information reporting:
* Deductions;
* Partnership/S-Corp income;
* Exemptions;
* Capital gains;
* Alimony income;
Percentage of net income misreported: 8.6%.
Little or noreporting;
* Nonfarm proprietor income;
* Informal supplier income;
* Other income;
* Rents and royalties;
* Farm income;
* Form 4947 income;
* Adjustments;
Percentage of net income misreported: 53.9%.
Source: IRS.
[End of figure]
In a 2007 report we highlighted the connection between a lack of
information reporting and the contribution of sole proprietors, a
significant portion of the small business community, to the tax gap.
[Footnote 10] IRS estimated the gross tax gap--the difference between
what taxpayers actually paid and what they should have paid on a
timely basis--to be $345 billion for tax year 2001, the most recent
estimate made. IRS also estimated that it will collect $55 billion,
leaving a net tax gap of $290 billion. IRS estimated that a large
portion of the gross tax gap, $197 billion, was caused by the
underreporting of income on individual tax returns. Of this, IRS
estimated that $68 billion was caused by sole proprietors
underreporting their net business income. The $68 billion does not
include other sole proprietor contributions to the tax gap, including
not paying because of failing to file a tax return, underpaying the
tax due on income that was correctly reported, and underpaying
employment taxes. Nor does it include tax noncompliance by other types
of businesses such as partnerships and S corporations. In the report,
we noted that a key reason for this noncompliance was that sole
proprietors were not subject to tax withholding, and only a portion of
their net business income was reported to IRS by third parties. Tax
noncompliance by some small businesses is unfair to businesses and
other taxpayers that pay their taxes--tax rates must be higher to
collect the same amount of revenue.
The 1099-MISCs are a powerful tool through which IRS can encourage
voluntary compliance by payees and detect underreported income of
payees that do not voluntarily comply. Increasing the numbers of 1099-
MISCs IRS receives from payers in turn would increase information
available for use in IRS's automated matching programs to detect tax
underreporting, including failure to file a tax return. For tax year
2004 (the last full year available for our 2009 report), the AUR
program assessed $972 million in additional taxes for payee
underreporting detected using 1099-MISC information.[Footnote 11] To
help IRS improve its use of 1099-MISC information, we recommended in
2009 that IRS collect data to help refine its matching process and
select the most productive cases for review. In response to our
recommendation, IRS reviewed a sample of AUR cases and plans to modify
its tax year 2010 matching criteria for 1099-MISC information.
Information reporting has allowed IRS to use its computerized matching
programs as an alternative to audits to address some issues. The
matching programs generally require less contact with taxpayers and
thus are less intrusive and involve less taxpayer time.
In addition, information reporting may reduce taxpayers' costs of
preparing their tax returns. In a 2006 report we described how
additional information reporting on the basis of securities
transactions could reduce taxpayers' need to track the basis of
securities they sold.[Footnote 12] The extent to which 1099-MISC
reporting reduces taxpayer recordkeeping costs is not known, but to
the extent it reduces the need to track receipts by year from each
payer it could have some effect on those costs.
IRS does not know the magnitude of 1099-MISC payer noncompliance or
the characteristics of payers that fail to comply with the reporting
requirements. Without an estimate of payer noncompliance, IRS has no
way of determining to what extent 1099-MISC payer noncompliance
creates a window of opportunity for payees to underreport their
business income and go undetected by IRS. Research would be key for
IRS in developing a cost-effective strategy to identify payers that
never submit 1099-MISCs. In 2009, we recommended that IRS study the
extent of 1099-MISC payer noncompliance and its contribution to the
tax gap, as well as the nature and characteristics of those payers who
do not comply.[Footnote 13] In response to our recommendations, IRS
plans to study payer noncompliance through its National Research
Program studies with results estimated to be available in December
2015.
Third Parties Incur Costs to File 1099-MISCs, but Case Study Entities
Reported That the Costs of Complying with Current Requirements Were
Relatively Low:
Existing information reporting requirements impose costs on the third-
party businesses required to file Form 1099-MISC. The expanded
reporting requirements will impose new costs. To comply with
information reporting requirements, third parties incur costs
internally or pay external parties. In-house costs may involve
additional recordkeeping costs beyond normal recordkeeping costs
related to running a business, as well as the costs of preparing and
filing the information returns themselves. If the third parties go
outside their organizations for help, they would incur out-of-pocket
costs to buy software or pay for others to prepare and file their
returns.
Data on the magnitude of these information reporting costs are not
readily available because taxpayers generally do not keep records of
the time and money spent complying with the tax system. A major
difficulty in measuring tax compliance costs, including the costs of
filing information returns, is disentangling accounting and
recordkeeping costs due to taxes from the costs that would have been
incurred in the absence of the federal tax system. Data on compliance
costs are typically collected by contacting a sample of taxpayers,
through surveys or interviews, and asking them for their best
recollection of the total time and money they spent on particular
compliance activities. The quality of the resulting data depends on
the ability of taxpayers to accurately recall the amount of time and
money they spent.
In the nine case studies we conducted in 2007, filers of information
returns told us that existing information return costs, both in-house
and for external payments, were relatively low. While these nine case
studies are not to be generalized to the entire population, they do
provide examples of costs and insights from the perspective of
organizations of different sizes and from different industries and of
organizations filing their own information returns and those filing on
behalf of others.[Footnote 14] In-house compliance costs include the
costs of getting taxpayer identification numbers (TIN), buying
software, tracking reportable payments, filing returns with IRS, and
mailing copies to taxpayers.
* One organization with employees numbering in the low thousands
estimated that its costs of preparing and filing a couple hundred
Forms 1099, which include recordkeeping and distinguishing goods from
services, were a minimal addition to its normal business costs.
* One small business employing under five people told us of possibly
spending 3 to 5 hours per year filing Form 1099 information returns
manually, using an accounting package to gather the information.
* An organization with more than 10,000 employees estimated spending
less than .005 percent of its yearly staff time on preparing and
filing Forms 1099, including recordkeeping.
* Unit prices for services provided to payers by selected software
vendors, service bureaus, and return preparers decreased as the number
of forms handled increased. Two external parties selling services
reported prices for preparing and filing Forms 1099 with IRS of about
$10 per form for 5 forms to about $2 per form for 100 forms, with one
of them charging about $0.80 per form for 100,000 forms. These prices
do not include the payers' recordkeeping costs.
This relationship of price to size for entities we studied is
consistent with what studies that we have seen show about the role of
fixed costs and economies of scale in complying with the tax code; we
are familiar with no similar studies of information returns.[Footnote
15]
Although our case study organizations indicated that 1099
recordkeeping and reporting costs are relatively low, costs may not be
as low as they could be. According to IRS, advisory group members, and
others we interviewed for our 2009 report, payers are confronted with
a variety of impediments to preparing and submitting 1099-MISC
forms.[Footnote 16] Some payers that do not submit their 1099-MISCs as
required may be unaware of their 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities.
Other payers may be confused about whether payments are reportable
because of different dollar reporting thresholds and the general
exemption for payments to corporations under current law. Some payers
misreport or neglect to report payee taxpayer identification numbers
(TIN) and could be subject to penalty and required to do backup
withholding on 1099-MISC payments to payees with bad TINs. For the
large number of payers each submitting a few 1099-MISCs, IRS does not
offer a fillable form on its Web site and requires payers to submit
scannable red ink forms, but some payers submit black and white 1099-
MISCs anyway.
Opportunities Exist to Mitigate the Burden and Promote Reporting
Compliance for Third Parties Submitting 1099-MISC Information Returns:
Although businesses will face additional costs for each additional
Form 1099, some options for modifying the 1099-MISC reporting
requirements could help mitigate the burden and promote payer
reporting compliance. Table 1 highlights options we previously
reported. We noted those options that were proposed by IRS, IRS
advisory groups, and the National Taxpayer Advocate.[Footnote 17] Our
list of 1099-MISC impediments and options is not exhaustive, nor is
the list of pros and cons associated with the options. Improved IRS
guidance and education are relatively low-cost options, but most
taxpayers use either tax preparers or tax software to prepare their
tax returns and may not read IRS instructions and guidance. While
taxpayer service options may improve compliance for those that are
inadvertently noncompliant, they are not likely to affect those that
are intentionally noncompliant.[Footnote 18] Some options to change
1099-MISC reporting requirements require congressional action, and
other options would be costly for IRS to implement. Where the option
involves particular issues, such as cost or taxpayer burden, we note
them in our table.
Table 1: Impediments to 1099-MISC Payer Reporting Compliance and
Options for Increasing Voluntary 1099-MISC Compliance:
Some payers are unaware of their 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities:
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Some payers are unaware of their
1099-MISC reporting responsibilities;
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Revise business tax form instructions to remind taxpayers of 1099-
MISC reporting requirements for specific expense types.
- IRS added a 1099-MISC reminder to the 2007 Schedule C instructions
for contract labor expenses, and such reminders can be added for other
1099-MISC reportable expenses such as rent and legal and professional
services.
* Target 1099-MISC related education and outreach activities to
specific payer groups (IRSAC, 2005; IRS Oversight Board, 2008).[A]
- IRS has initiated such outreach to federal, state, local, and tribal
governments, but more research is needed to determine which business
payer groups to target.
In response to our 2009 recommendation, IRS added a general reminder
to the 2009 Publication 535 Business Expenses to highlight 1099-MISC
reporting responsibilities.
All of the above may be of limited efficacy if taxpayers rely on paid
preparers and tax preparation software and do not look at IRS
instructions or guidance, or if taxpayers are willfully misreporting.
Providing additional guidance could be helpful if tax return
preparation software is based on the guidance.
* Increase outreach to paid preparers and tax software vendors to
promote awareness of 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities (IRSAC, 2005).
* Providing 1099-MISC training outreach through IRS‘s phone forums or
Nationwide Tax Forums can reach large numbers of paid preparers. At
the 2010 Tax Forums, IRS discussed ways to properly report 1099-MISC
payment information.
* Many payers rely on paid preparers and tax software to help them
comply with their reporting responsibilities.
* Add check-the-box question to business tax forms requiring taxpayers
to attest whether they submitted 1099-MISCs related to their reported
expenses (IRSAC, 2005; National Taxpayer Advocate, 2005).
- Would force tax preparers and tax software to query taxpayers about
their expenses, and taxpayers would have to respond to the checkbox
under penalty of perjury.
- According to the National Taxpayer Advocate, the burden associated
with a checkbox asking taxpayers to verify that they have complied
with existing legal requirements is inherently small.
- Impact may be on increasing voluntary compliance, with little
utility as an IRS enforcement tool.
- California has a similar checkbox on state corporation and S-
corporation income tax returns, which serves as a reminder to
taxpayers. California has not evaluated how this reporting feature
affects payer reporting compliance.
* Add a chart in the business income tax instructions to help payers
determine if they have a potential 1099-MISC reporting requirement and
need to review the 1099-MISC instructions. IRS frequently provides
charts and worksheets to help taxpayers understand their filing
obligations.[B]
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Some payers first learn about
1099-MISC reporting responsibilities from their tax preparers after
1099-MISC due dates have passed.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Add IRS‘s ’Information Returns Processing“ hyperlink to its
’Starting a Business“ and ’Small Business and Self-Employed Tax Center“
sites to make information reporting a more prominent aspect of
business responsibilities.
* Provide a general notice about 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities
to new small business owners when they apply for an employer
identification number (EIN).
- IRS currently encourages online application and provides EINs
immediately after validation which makes this a low cost option.
* Provide a notice about 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities, key
requirements, and due dates to small businesses each fall. Notices
could be sent to some businesses, such as Schedule C filers reporting
contract labor expenses for the first time, or all small businesses.
- Potentially costly mailing. May not be cost-effective if large
numbers of businesses do not have 1099-MISC reportable payments.
* Have single due date for 1099-MISC submission to IRS.
- Change paper submission due date to IRS from February 28 to March 31
to encourage taxpayers and tax preparers to prepare any 1099-MISCs
that may have been overlooked without fear of penalty (IRSAC, 2005).
- Change electronic submission due date to IRS from March 31 to
February 28 to allow IRS more time to process 1099-MISC for computer
matching (Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC),
2006).
- Changing due dates for submitting 1099-MISC to IRS affects due dates
for other information return series, but does not change the January
due date to payees.
* Waive late submission penalties for first-time payers.
- Some payers who realize they are late in submitting 1099-MISCs may
choose not to file rather than run the risk of incurring late
penalties. IRS already reduces the late penalty for 1099-MISCs
submitted before August 1 to encourage voluntary submissions.
- Hard for IRS to distinguish first-time payers that may have
reasonable cause for being late from payers that have willfully
neglected to submit 1099-MISCs. Thus, this option may require
legislative action to grant IRS authority to automatically waive the
late penalty for 1099-MISC payers reporting for the first time.
Some payers are confused about 1099-MISC requirements:
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Under existing guidance, payers
must navigate through 8 pages of singled-spaced instructions to
determine what to report in the 14 boxes on the 1099-MISC.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Add a chart in the 1099-MISC instructions for distinguishing 1099-
MISC reportable from non-reportable payments and for calculating
whether reportable payments reached reporting threshold. For example,
IRS General Instructions for Forms 1099, 1098, 5498 and W-2g contain a
chart highlighting what payments and amounts to report for various
information returns, including Form 1099-MISC.
* Clarify guidance to address common misreporting errors.
- IRS does not have research identifying the reasons for payer
reporting problems.
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Some payers overlook reporting
payments for non-routine or sporadic one-time transactions.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Revise business tax form instructions to remind taxpayers of 1099-
MISC reporting requirements for specific expense types.
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Payers must determine whether
payments are reportable due to different reporting thresholds. Some
payers may underreport miscellaneous income types, such as royalties,
with thresholds lower than $600.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Add a chart in the 1099-MISC instructions for distinguishing 1099-
MISC reportable from non-reportable payments and for identifying
whether reportable payments reached reporting threshold. Similarly,
adding a chart in the business income tax instructions could help
payers determine if they have a potential 1099-MISC submission
requirement and need to review the full instructions.
* Standardize or eliminate dollar threshold for reporting payments
(NTA, 2005; IRPAC, 2006).[C]
- Lower uniform amount (National Taxpayer Advocate, 2005).
- Increased payer burden to submit more 1099-MISCs.
- Increased number of 1099-MISCs to IRS for detecting payee income
underreporting.
- Higher uniform amount.
- Decreased payer burden.
- Decreased number of 1099-MISCs to IRS for detecting payee income
underreporting.
- Some options to change the dollar reporting threshold require
legislative action.
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Under current law, payers must
determine whether payee is a corporation that is exempt from 1099-MISC
reporting.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Amend legislation”-as was achieved under the broader reporting
requirements enacted in 2010”-to extend reporting requirements to
include service payments to corporations. We previously reported that
the benefits in terms of increased revenue and taxpayer compliance
exceed costs for reporting service payments to corporations. In 1991,
we suggested that Congress needed to enact legislation to require
reporting on payments to corporations and in 2009 formally recommended
that matter for congressional consideration.[D] IRS agrees that the
benefits of this option in addressing the tax gap outweigh the costs.
The Bush Administration requested legislative action in its fiscal
year 2008 and 2009 budgets and the Obama Administration in its fiscal
year 2011 budget. According to Treasury estimates, extending the
reporting to payments to corporations would generate revenue due in
part to increased voluntary compliance and IRS‘s ability to detect
underreported payments received by businesses.
* The burden of determining the payee‘s status would be simplified.
Some payers already submit 1099-MISC for all corporate payees rather
than determine payee status. (IRSAC, 2005). However, other payers fail
to submit 1099-MISCs currently required because they mistake small
business payees as corporations exempt from reporting.
* Payers need to submit more 1099-MISCs (IRPAC, 2007). Various phase-
in options could minimize the burden and disruption for payers.[E]
Some options listed below could add complexity for payers to determine
whether the payee is exempt or the payment is reportable.
- Exempting transactions paid by merchant payment cards, such as
credit cards. In August 2010, IRS issued a rule exempting payments
reported under the new payment-card reporting requirements from 1099-
MISC reporting.
- Delaying the effective date.
- Grandfathering ongoing relationships or specifying a lead time for
collecting information on them.
- Issuing guidance to require that for business relationships just
starting, TIN and information about services versus goods be provided
immediately, for example on the invoice.
- Initially covering only specific payment types, such as rent
payments to corporations.
- Extending existing exemptions for payments like freight, effectively
exempting certain categories of corporations.
- Requiring reporting only for payments to some corporations, such as
those privately held or below a certain size, for instance, smaller
than the Fortune 500; exempt corporations could show their exemption
on their invoices.[F]
- Raising the $600 floor for reporting (discussed above).
- Exempting small payer businesses from reporting based on their
revenues or other factors; this option risks allowing noncompliance by
some payees and gaming of the system. For example, a business may
receive payments totaling $1 million with $200,000 of that reported to
IRS by the nonexempt payers. If the business chooses to report only
the $200,000 on its tax return, the IRS matching program would not be
able to detect the $800,000 underreported.
Some payers find 1099-MISC submission burdensome/inconvenient:
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Some payers misreport or neglect
to report payee taxpayer identification numbers (TINs) and could be
subject to penalty and required to do backup withholding on 1099-MISC
payments to payees with bad TINS. Some payers misreport 1099-MISCs
using the payee‘s partnership‘s name and TIN rather than the
individual payee‘s Social Security Number (SSN).
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Provide education and outreach activities to:
- Remind payers to secure TINs from payees for 1099-MISC reporting to
avoid backup withholding for missing or incorrect TINs.[G]
- Remind payers of IRS‘s voluntary TIN Matching program that allows
authorized payers the opportunity to match payee TIN and name with IRS
records free of charge before submitting the 1099-MISC.[H]
- Increase awareness of IRS policy on waiving incorrect or missing TIN
information penalties and how a payer can establish reasonable cause.
* Issue guidance to require that for business relationships just
starting, TIN information be provided immediately, for example on the
invoice.
* Require payers to validate payee TINs (IRS, 2007).[I]
- Increase reporting burden for payers.
- Decrease number of 1099-MISCs unmatchable to payees for IRS‘s
automated enforcement programs.
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Payers submitting paper 1099-
MISCs are required to use forms printed with special red ink scannable
by IRS. IRS does not offer a fillable form for downloading on its Web
site, and forms computer generated from accounting or tax software are
not acceptable formats. Some payers submit black and white 1099-MISCs
anyway.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Provide an online portal for electronic submission similar to the
Social Security Administration‘s portal for W-2s (ETAAC, 2007, 2008). j
- Potentially affects a majority of payers as 90 percent of payers
used paper forms and 64 percent of all payers submitted one to four
forms in 2006.
- Facilitate more accurate 1099-MISC entry and processing for IRS.
- Implementation has costs, and IRS currently has no plans for a 1099-
MISC portal.
* Allow payers to submit computer generated black and white 1099-MISCs
(IRSAC, 2005).
- IRS currently has no plans to upgrade its scanning technology to
eliminate the special red ink requirement and process computer-
generated black and white 1099-MISCs.
- IRS submission processing officials said some black and white
computer-generated forms are currently scanned but require additional
work to ensure information was correctly scanned. These officials
predicted that relaxing the red ink requirement would overwhelm the
current scanning operation. In 2009, we reported that IRS had not
conducted any research to determine the extent to which computer-
generated black and white forms slows 1099-MISC processing.
- Lowering the 250 threshold for electronic submission would reduce
the total number of paper submissions and might ameliorate such
slowdown (ETAAC, 2007). Lowering the threshold would require
legislative action.
* Promote awareness of any offers for free electronic 1099-MISC
submission services available through IRS‘s authorized e-file
partners. (IRS)
- A few vendors in the past offered free online preparation and
submission for small numbers of 1099-MISCs for businesses.k
Impediments facing 1099-MISC payers: Payers using IRS‘s Filing
Information Returns System (FIRE) must register and buy software to
format 1099-MISC data transmission, or pay a vendor to submit their
forms electronically.
Options for increasing voluntary compliance and related actions, pros,
and cons:
* Provide an online portal (discussed above).
- Online portal likely to require registration with IRS and may be
convenient for payers submitting a few forms, but not likely
convenient for payers submitting 250 or more forms.
Source: GAO analysis, including that done in GAO-09-238 and GAO-08-266.
Notes:
[A] IRSAC, Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council Public Meeting,
November 17, 2005 (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 17, 2005) and IRS, IRS
Oversight Board, Annual Report 2007, (Washington, D.C.: March 2008).
[B] For example, the Form 1040 tax return instructions to help
individuals determine whether they are required to file an income
return. Also, the Schedule SE highlights who must file the schedule
for self-employment tax and includes a chart to help individuals
determine whether to file the short or long Schedule SE.
[C] In 2005 testimony, the National Taxpayer Advocate recommended
reducing or eliminating the $600 threshold. In 2006, IRPAC recommended
increasing the medical payment threshold to $5,000 to reduce payer
reporting burden.
[D] GAO/GGD-91-118. In 1992, we recommended federal agencies issue
information returns on payments to corporations (GAO/GGD-92-130). In
2004, we reported that revenues from extending reporting requirements
to corporate payments could increase by billions of dollars (GAO-04-
649). See GAO, Tax Administration: Costs and Uses of Third Party
Information Returns, GAO-08-266 (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 20, 2007) for
a list of how the additional costs payers would incur could be
mitigated. GAO-09-238 included the matter for congressional
consideration.
[E] The options are based on our previous analysis of 1099-MISC
reporting requirements; we have not analyzed the costs and benefits of
reporting payments for goods.
[F] To minimize burden on small businesses, the National Taxpayer
Advocate recommended expanding 1099-MISC reporting to include
corporations only if IRS's National Research Program (NRP) found
significant levels of noncompliance among small corporations. National
Taxpayer Advocate, 2007 Annual Report to Congress, Vol. 1, Section
Two--Key Legislative Recommendations, (Washington, D.C.: Jan. 9,
2008). This phase-in approach does not simplify the need to track the
payee's status.
[G] IRS Form W-9 can be used to obtain and certify the payee's tax
identification number (TIN). IRS uses the combination of the payee
name and TIN to match the information reported on a 1099-MISC with
information reported by the payee on income tax returns.
[H] Currently TIN matching is only available to authorized payers that
filed information returns with IRS in at least one of the two past tax
years.
[I] Internal Revenue Service, Reducing the Federal Tax Gap: A Report
on Improving Voluntary Compliance, (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 2, 2007).
[J] The Social Security Administration offers free online submission
of W-2s for payers submitting 20 or fewer forms.
[K] In 2007, we reported that, according to vendors we interviewed,
prices for preparing and submitting 1099-MISCs were relatively low,
ranging from about $10 per form for 5 forms to about $2 per form for
100 forms, with one of them charging about $0.80 per form for 100,000
forms. See GAO, Tax Administration: Costs and Uses of Third-Party
Information Returns, GAO-08-266 (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 20, 2007).
[End of table]
As we reported in 2009, multiple approaches could help IRS to mitigate
the reporting costs and promote payer compliance with 1099-MISC
reporting requirements.[Footnote 19] For example, the evidence shows
that the benefits outweigh the costs for information reporting for
payments to corporations. For other options, it is not clear whether
the benefits outweigh the associated costs, and additional research by
IRS could help to evaluate the feasibility of more costly options,
such as allowing black and white paper 1099-MISCs. Action to move
forward on options to target outreach to specific payer groups or
clarify guidance to reduce common reporting mistakes would hinge on
IRS first conducting research to understand the magnitude of and
reasons for payer noncompliance.
In 2009, we recommended two actions that IRS could take to help payers
understand their 1099-MISC reporting responsibilities:[Footnote 20]
* Provide payers with a chart to identify reportable payments. IRS
disagreed with our recommendation and stated that the Form 1099-MISC
instructions already list which payments are reportable and explain
the rules for specific payment types. We believe that a chart would
provide taxpayers with a quick guide for navigating the Form 1099-MISC
instructions, already eight pages long under the current reporting
requirements.
* Evaluate adding a new checkbox on business tax returns for payers to
attest whether they submitted their 1099-MISCs as required. IRS also
disagreed with this recommendation and stated that a similar question
was removed from the corporate tax return after the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980 was enacted. We believe results from the
evaluation we recommend would be useful in weighing the benefits and
burdens associated with a checkbox option.
To reduce the submission burden facing many payers submitting small
numbers of 1099-MISCs, we also recommended that IRS evaluate the cost-
effectiveness of eliminating or relaxing the red ink requirement to
allow payers to submit computer-generated black and white 1099-MISCs.
In April 2009, IRS conducted a test to determine the labor to process
a sample of 4,027 red-ink 1099-MISCs versus the same documents
photocopied. IRS told us that, using the same scanning equipment and
employees, the red-ink sample took 2 hours and 9 minutes to process
versus 28 hours and 44 minutes to process and manually key the
photocopy sample. Based on the test results, IRS decided to maintain
the red ink requirement to minimize labor costs. We have not reviewed
the results of the IRS test.
Our prior work did not assess requiring 1099-MISC reporting on
payments for goods. Some of our findings and recommendations may be
relevant, but we do not know the extent of relevance.
Madame Chairman, this concludes my statement. I would be pleased to
respond to any questions you or other Members of the Committee may
have.
GAO Contacts and Acknowledgments:
For questions about this statement, please contact me at (202) 512-
9110 or whitej@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of
Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last
page of this statement. Individuals who made key contributions to this
testimony include Amy Bowser, Bertha Dong, Lawrence Korb, MaryLynn
Sergent, and Cheri Truett.
[End of section]
Related GAO Products:
Tax Gap: IRS Could Do More to Promote Compliance by Third Parties with
Miscellaneous Income Reporting Requirements. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238]. Washington, D.C.: January 28,
2009.
Tax Gap: Actions That Could Improve Rental Real Estate Reporting
Compliance. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-956].
Washington, D.C.: August 28, 2008.
Highlights of the Joint Forum on Tax Compliance: Options for
Improvement and Their Budgetary Potential. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-703SP]. Washington, D.C.: June 2008.
Tax Administration: Costs and Uses of Third-Party Information Returns.
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-266]. Washington, D.C.:
November 20, 2007.
Business Tax Reform: Simplification and Increased Uniformity of
Taxation Would Yield Benefits. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-1113T]. Washington, D.C.: September
20, 2006.
Capital Gains Tax Gap: Requiring Brokers to Report Securities Cost
Basis Would Improve Compliance if Related Challenges Are Addressed.
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-603]. Washington, D.C.:
June 13, 2006.
Tax Policy: Summary of Estimates of the Costs of the Federal Tax
System. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-878].
Washington, D.C.: August 26, 2005.
Tax Administration: IRS Should Continue to Expand Reporting on Its
Enforcement Efforts. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-03-378]. Washington, D.C.: January 31,
2003.
Tax Administration: Benefits of a Corporate Document Matching Program
Exceed the Costs. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO/GGD-91-118]. Washington, D.C.:
September 27, 1991.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] Pub. L. No. 111-148, Title IX, Subtitle A, 124 Stat. 119 (Mar. 23,
2010).
[2] Section 9006 expanded information reporting to include payments of
amounts in consideration for property and payments of gross proceeds.
In its July 19, 2010 Notice 2010-51 requesting public comment on these
amendments to information reporting, IRS specifically asked the public
to comment on the appropriate scope of the terms and how to interpret
the terms in a manner that minimizes the reporting burden and avoids
duplicative reporting.
[3] GAO, Tax Gap: IRS Could Do More to Promote Compliance by Third
Parties with Miscellaneous Income Reporting Requirements, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238] (Washington, D.C.: Jan. 28,
2009). In this report, we made eight recommendations to IRS, six of
which IRS agreed with and is taking action to address.
[4] GAO, Tax Administration: Benefits of a Corporate Document Matching
Program Exceed the Costs, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO/GGD-91-118] (Washington, D.C.: Sept.
27, 1991).
[5] According to the Department of the Treasury's estimates, the Obama
Administration's fiscal year 2011 proposal for reporting payments to
corporations would have generated an estimated $9.2 billion from 2011
through 2020, in part because of increased voluntary compliance.
However, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the
Administration's 2011 proposal would have generated about $3.4 billion
for the same period.
[6] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238]; Tax
Administration: Costs and Uses of Third-Party Information Returns,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-266] (Washington, D.C.:
Nov. 20, 2007); and Tax Gap: A Strategy for Reducing the Gap Should
Include Options for Addressing Sole Proprietor Noncompliance,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-1014] (Washington,
D.C.: July 13, 2007).
[7] Treasury Regulations §1.6041-3. See GAO, Tax Gap: Actions That
Could Improve Rental Real Estate Reporting Compliance, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-956] (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 28,
2008).
[8] IRS uses the Service Center Recognition Image Processing System
(SCRIPS) to capture printed or handwritten information from paper
forms and convert the information into machine-readable format for
computer processing.
[9] 26 U.S.C. § 6011(e)(2)(A).
[10] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-1014].
[11] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238].
[12] GAO, Capital Gains Tax Gap: Requiring Brokers to Report
Securities Cost Basis Would Improve Compliance if Related Challenges
Are Addressed, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-603]
(Washington, D.C.: June 13, 2006).
[13] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238].
[14] For additional details on our case studies, see GAO-08-266.
[15] According to Slemrod and Bakija, studies consistently found that
the smaller the firm, the larger the cost of complying with the tax
system per dollar of various measures of the size of the firm. (See
Joel Slemrod and Jon Bakija, Taxing Ourselves: A Citizen's Guide to
the Debate over Taxes, 3RD ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2004.)
[16] IRS advisory groups include the Electronic Tax Administration
Advisory Committee (ETAAC), the Information Reporting Program Advisory
Committee (IRPAC), and the Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council
(IRSAC). We also interviewed tax professionals, tax software vendors,
paid preparers, and other business and professional association
representatives knowledgeable about 1099-MISC payer reporting
attending the IRS National Public Liaisons (NPL) fall 2007 meeting.
[17] The table notes options specifically recommended by IRS's
advisory groups or by IRS in its budgets and tax gap plans at the time
of our 2009 report on reporting miscellaneous income.
[18] GAO, Highlights of the Joint Forum on Tax Compliance: Options for
Improvement and Their Budgetary Potential, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-703SP] (Washington, D.C.: June
2008).
[19] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-238].
[20] IRS has taken action to implement a third recommendation--to add
a 1099-MISC reporting reminder to Publication 535 Business Expenses.
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Phone:
The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO‘s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO‘s Web site,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm].
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional
information.
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548: