Air Travel

Effectiveness of State Consumer Protection Efforts Varies Gao ID: RCED-90-136 August 29, 1990

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on states' efforts to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive trade practices in the travel industry.

GAO found that: (1) financially distressed tour operators provided some consumers with services that were less complete than or inferior to what the consumer was promised; (2) consumers lost millions of dollars to fraudulent sales of travel services; (3) airline advertising practices sometimes violate state laws against unfair and deceptive trade practices; (4) passenger rights are not always well-specified; (5) despite some success in providing travel consumer protection, the states' efforts have been less effective because the operators typically operate by mail or telephone across state lines; (6) three of the four states GAO studied have specific travel-related laws, which are primarily enforced by state attorneys general, to protect consumers; and (7) two of the states also created special offices responsible for some consumer protection functions.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.