Aviation Noise

A National Policy is Needed Gao ID: T-RCED-90-112 September 27, 1990

GAO discussed the economic impact that noise restrictions have had and are likely to have on the aviation industry. GAO noted that: (1) in the absence of a national noise policy, airports were likely to continue implementing noise abatement measures to respond to residential concerns; (2) the lack of coordination among local airports could place an increasingly heavy burden of higher costs and inefficient aircraft use on the nation's air transportation system; (3) airport officials expected noise-related restrictions to increase between 1995 and 2000; (4) the aircraft and airline industries believed that they had the capacity to phase out older, noiser stage-2 aircraft by the year 2000, but would need 10 years advance notice to achieve that goal; (5) the costs of phasing out stage-2 aircraft would fall between $2 billion and $5 billion, depending on whether airlines replaced or retrofitted their existing stage-2 fleets; (6) two organizations reported similar estimates of $2.7 billion and $3.1 billion for the stage-2 ban, while two other organizations reported much higher costs; (7) alternatives to aircraft replacement would significantly reduce the cost of a stage-2 ban; (8) airline officials believed that the impact of a stage-2 ban on individual airlines depended on the size of each carrier's fleet and on its financial health; and (9) the cost of phasing out stage-2 aircraft was likely to be borne partly by the airline industry, in the form of lower profits, and partly by airline passengers.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.