Aviation Security

Development of New Security Technology Has Not Met Expectations Gao ID: RCED-94-142 May 19, 1994

Although the Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1990, passed in the wake of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, set goals for deploying new technology to detect explosives, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has made little progress toward introducing new detection systems into everyday use. Several devices show promise, but technical problems are hampering their development and approval. FAA estimates that it could take as long as five years to approve new devices for airline use. Similarly, FAA's efforts to enhance airline survivability are promising but years from completion. GAO identified several weaknesses in FAA's security research program. For example, FAA does not plan to test new explosive detection systems at airports during the certification process. Further, FAA does not (1) do software reviews to evaluate system designs, (2) emphasize integrating different technologies into total systems, and (3) give enough attention to human factors. Purchasing the new security equipment will also place demands on airlines throughout the next decade. Yet FAA lacks a strategy to guide its and the airlines' efforts to introduce this equipment. If FAA expeditiously develops a strategy, the airlines will be in a better position to plan and budget for future security acquisitions. In addition, Congress is considering clarifying the availability of Airport Improvement Program grants to buy explosive detection systems. Several issues need to be resolved before such funds can be used for that purpose.

GAO found that: (1) FAA has made little progress in deploying new explosive detection systems because of technical problems; (2) FAA could take 2 to 5 years to approve new devices for airlines' use; (3) FAA efforts to enhance aircraft survivability are promising but are several years from completion; (4) FAA does not plan to test new explosive detection systems at airports during the certification process; (5) FAA has not conducted software reviews to evaluate system designs, emphasized integrating different technologies into total systems, or focused sufficient attention on human factors issues; (6) FAA lacks a purchasing strategy to guide its and the airlines' efforts to implement new security equipment; (7) if FAA expeditiously develops an implementation strategy, the airlines will be in a better position to plan and budget for future security acquisitions; and (8) Congress is considering legislation that would clarify the availability of Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant funds to purchase explosive detection systems.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.