Anti-Car Theft Act

Implementation Status of Certain Provisions of the 1992 Act Gao ID: GGD-96-77 April 22, 1996

The Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 was intended to reduce automobile theft by making it harder to sell stolen cars and parts. This report provides information on the following parts of the act: (1) the national information system on motor vehicle titles, (2) the marking of major component parts of passenger motor vehicles with an identification number, and (3) the national information system on stolen passenger motor vehicles and parts. GAO discusses the status of implementation and issues that may impede the implementation or influence the effectiveness of these provisions.

GAO found that: (1) the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) have begun developing information systems and DOT has issued initial parts-marking regulations; (2) a DOT task force has made recommendations on the legislative and administrative actions needed to address problems in titling, registration, and controls over salvage to deter motor vehicle theft; (3) states need about $19 million in federal grants to implement their part of the titling system; (4) the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has proposed legislation to implement the task force's recommendations; (5) issues affecting the implementation or effectiveness of the proposed titling information system include prosecution immunity, major vehicle damage disclosure, the system's complexity, and state participation, funding, and responsibility; (6) the association that DOJ authorized to set up the stolen vehicle and parts database and complete a pilot study on the database's concept and maintenance feasibility expects to begin studying parts-marking effectiveness in May 1996; and (7) potential barriers to the implementation or effectiveness of the act's parts marking provisions include state funding for the database, confusion over what vehicles and parts are to be marked, whether local law enforcement agencies have the resources necessary to follow up on identified stolen vehicles and parts, and the potential adverse economic impact on insurance companies and small businesses.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.