Transportation Infrastructure

Advantages and Disadvantages of Wrap-Up Insurance for Large Construction Projects Gao ID: RCED-99-155 June 1, 1999

Traditionally, project owners, contractors, and subcontractors have purchased insurance independently to protect themselves from financial losses. In contrast, with wrap-up insurance, the project owner can cover all the parties involved in the project. During the last decade, wrap-up insurance has been used increasingly on large construction projects because of the potential for cost savings. Wrap-up insurance covered about 300 construction projects nationwide in 1998. This report discusses the advantages and the disadvantages of wrap-up insurance over traditional insurance and the factors that can affect the broader use of wrap-up insurance.

GAO noted that: (1) owners of transportation projects, such as transit agencies and state departments of transportation, experience a number of advantages and disadvantages when they use wrap-up insurance; (2) major advantages include savings from buying insurance in bulk, eliminating duplication in coverage, handling claims more efficiently, reducing potential litigation, and enhancing workplace safety; (3) according to insurance industry officials, wrap-up insurance can save project owners up to 50 percent on the cost of traditional insurance, or from 1 to 3 percent of a project's construction cost, depending on its size; (4) the potential disadvantages of wrap-up insurance include requiring project owners to invest more time and resources in administration; (5) project owners must hire additional personnel or pay to contract out the management of the wrap-up insurance; (6) in addition, project owners could also have to pay large premiums at the beginning of the project; (7) however, transportation officials said these costs were reasonable; (8) a number of factors can affect the broader use of wrap-up insurance; (9) perhaps the most significant barriers are state systems for workers' compensation that, in some states, effectively prevent wrap-up insurance by greatly reducing its potential cost savings; (10) another limitation is that a project must be sufficiently large, or contain at least a sufficient amount of labor costs, to make wrap-up insurance financially viable; and (11) some contractors dislike wrap-up insurance because it reduces a contractor's profits from insurance rebates.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.