Aviation and the Environment
FAA's and NASA's Research and Development Plans for Noise Reduction Are Aligned but the Prospects of Achieving Noise Reduction Goals Are Uncertain
Gao ID: GAO-08-384 February 15, 2008
Reducing aviation noise is important to the efficient operation and expansion of the National Airspace System because community opposition to aviation noise is a major obstacle to airport and runway development. Such development is needed to help address congestion and meet the nation's rapidly growing demand for air travel. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have the primary federal responsibility for research and development (R&D) on aviation noise. FAA focuses on the impacts of aviation noise on communities, while NASA focuses on noise at its source--aircraft engines and airframes. Both FAA and NASA have set noise reduction goals. This congressionally requested report on aviation noise addresses (1) FAA's and NASA's R&D plans for addressing aviation noise and the extent to which they are aligned and (2) FAA's and NASA's noise reduction goals and the likelihood that these goals will be achieved. To conduct its work, GAO reviewed FAA's and NASA's R&D planning documents, coordinating mechanisms, and research plans and interviewed agency officials. In addition, aviation industry representatives reviewed and commented on a draft of this report. A draft was provided to FAA and NASA. Both agencies had no comment.
FAA's and NASA's R&D plans include a wide range of projects for addressing aviation noise, and these plans are aligned through partnerships and planning and coordinating mechanisms. FAA sponsors aviation noise R&D in areas such as aviation noise measurement, aviation noise effects, aviation noise and emissions interrelationships, and flight procedures and technologies to mitigate the impact of noise on communities. FAA sponsors much of this research through partnerships with universities; other federal agencies, including NASA; and industry. NASA conducts R&D that can eventually lead to new technologies for making substantially quieter aircraft provided that the technologies are further developed by industry and integrated into production-ready aircraft designs. FAA and NASA have aligned their aviation noise R&D activities by working with interagency planning and coordinating groups to establish objectives for the nation's aeronautical research and for specific research on the environmental impacts of next generation aviation technologies. Both agencies also serve on the same aviation research advisory groups, and the alignment of their aviation noise R&D activities is reflected in strategic plans for the National Airspace System that indicates how each agency's R&D efforts will contribute to meeting goals for reducing noise and thereby help reduce community opposition to increasing aviation system capacity. FAA's and NASA's noise reduction goals are designed, together, to reduce people's exposure to aviation noise primarily by reducing such noise at its source, but the likelihood of achieving these goals is uncertain. Under FAA's targets, the number of people exposed to significant aviation noise--estimated at 500,000 nationwide--would be reduced by 4 percent a year through fiscal year 2012. NASA's targets, established for the next three generations of aircraft, would lead to the entry into service of successively quieter aircraft by 2015, 2020-2025, and 2030-2035, respectively. The likelihood of meeting these targets depends on a number of uncertainties. First, federal funding will be needed not only for NASA's research but also for later-stage R&D, which NASA expects others to perform. The administration has proposed a 10-year program to support later-stage R&D to demonstrate technologies for industry acceptance. But even if funded, the development of noise reduction technologies may be limited by concerns about global warming, since advances in these technologies could make it more difficult to also achieve reductions in aircraft emissions of greenhouse gases. Also uncertain is the extent to which manufacturers will integrate newly developed technologies into aircraft and engine designs. Finally, it is uncertain whether airlines will purchase new aircraft or retrofit existing aircraft with the new technologies in sufficient numbers to achieve targeted reductions in exposure to aviation noise. Failure to achieve FAA's and NASA's noise reduction goals could constrain efforts to expand the National Airspace System's capacity and reduce congestion.
GAO-08-384, Aviation and the Environment: FAA's and NASA's Research and Development Plans for Noise Reduction Are Aligned but the Prospects of Achieving Noise Reduction Goals Are Uncertain
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-08-384
entitled 'Aviation and the Environment: FAA's and NASA's Research and
Development Plans for Noise Reduction Are Aligned but the Prospects of
Achieving Noise Reduction Goals are Uncertain' which was released on
March 17, 2008.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Report to Congressional Committees:
GAO:
February 2008:
Aviation And The Environment:
FAA's and NASA's Research and Development Plans for Noise Reduction Are
Aligned but the Prospects of Achieving Noise Reduction Goals Are
Uncertain:
GAO-08-384:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-08-384, a report to congressional committees.
Why GAO Did This Study:
Reducing aviation noise is important to the efficient operation and
expansion of the National Airspace System because community opposition
to aviation noise is a major obstacle to airport and runway
development. Such development is needed to help address congestion and
meet the nation‘s rapidly growing demand for air travel. The Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) have the primary federal responsibility for
research and development (R&D) on aviation noise. FAA focuses on the
impacts of aviation noise on communities, while NASA focuses on noise
at its source”aircraft engines and airframes. Both FAA and NASA have
set noise reduction goals. This congressionally requested report on
aviation noise addresses (1) FAA‘s and NASA‘s R&D plans for addressing
aviation noise and the extent to which they are aligned and (2) FAA‘s
and NASA‘s noise reduction goals and the likelihood that these goals
will be achieved. To conduct its work, GAO reviewed FAA‘s and NASA‘s
R&D planning documents, coordinating mechanisms, and research plans and
interviewed agency officials. In addition, aviation industry
representatives reviewed and commented on a draft of this report. A
draft was provided to FAA and NASA. Both agencies had no comment.
What GAO Found:
FAA‘s and NASA‘s R&D plans include a wide range of projects for
addressing aviation noise, and these plans are aligned through
partnerships and planning and coordinating mechanisms. FAA sponsors
aviation noise R&D in areas such as aviation noise measurement,
aviation noise effects, aviation noise and emissions
interrelationships, and flight procedures and technologies to mitigate
the impact of noise on communities. FAA sponsors much of this research
through partnerships with universities; other federal agencies,
including NASA; and industry. NASA conducts R&D that can eventually
lead to new technologies for making substantially quieter aircraft
provided that the technologies are further developed by industry and
integrated into production-ready aircraft designs. FAA and NASA have
aligned their aviation noise R&D activities by working with interagency
planning and coordinating groups to establish objectives for the
nation‘s aeronautical research and for specific research on the
environmental impacts of next generation aviation technologies. Both
agencies also serve on the same aviation research advisory groups, and
the alignment of their aviation noise R&D activities is reflected in
strategic plans for the National Airspace System that indicates how
each agency‘s R&D efforts will contribute to meeting goals for reducing
noise and thereby help reduce community opposition to increasing
aviation system capacity. FAA‘s and NASA‘s noise reduction goals are
designed, together, to reduce people‘s exposure to aviation noise
primarily by reducing such noise at its source, but the likelihood of
achieving these goals is uncertain. Under FAA‘s targets, the number of
people exposed to significant aviation noise”estimated at 500,000
nationwide”would be reduced by 4 percent a year through fiscal year
2012. NASA‘s targets, established for the next three generations of
aircraft, would lead to the entry into service of successively quieter
aircraft by 2015, 2020-2025, and 2030-2035, respectively. The
likelihood of meeting these targets depends on a number of
uncertainties. First, federal funding will be needed not only for
NASA‘s research but also for later-stage R&D, which NASA expects others
to perform. The administration has proposed a 10-year program to
support later-stage R&D to demonstrate technologies for industry
acceptance. But even if funded, the development of noise reduction
technologies may be limited by concerns about global warming, since
advances in these technologies could make it more difficult to also
achieve reductions in aircraft emissions of greenhouse gases. Also
uncertain is the extent to which manufacturers will integrate newly
developed technologies into aircraft and engine designs. Finally, it is
uncertain whether airlines will purchase new aircraft or retrofit
existing aircraft with the new technologies in sufficient numbers to
achieve targeted reductions in exposure to aviation noise. Failure to
achieve FAA‘s and NASA‘s noise reduction goals could constrain efforts
to expand the National Airspace System‘s capacity and reduce
congestion.
To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on
[hyperlink, http://www.GAO-08-384]. For more information, contact
Gerald L. Dillingham at (202) 512-2834 or dillinghamg@gao.gov.
[End of section]
United States Government Accountability Office:
Contents:
Letter:
Results in Brief:
FAA and NASA Use Partnerships and Planning and Coordinating Mechanisms
to Align R&D on Noise Reduction:
FAA and NASA Have Established Noise Reduction Technology Goals, but R&D
Funding Issues and Other Factors Make the Achievement of Noise
Reduction Goals Uncertain:
Agency Comments:
Appendix I: PARTNER Participants and Projects:
Appendix II: NASA Letter to GAO:
Appendix III: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
Tables:
Table 1: AIP and PFC Investments for Noise-Related Purposes for Fiscal
Years 1982-2007:
Table 2: FAA Funds for R&D Efforts in Fiscal Years 1997-2007:
Table 3: NASA's N+X Generation Aircraft Program:
Figure:
Figure 1: NASA's Research Approach Triangle:
Abbreviations:
ADS-B: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast:
AIP: Airport Improvement Program:
CDA: Continuous Descent Arrival:
CLEEN: Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise:
dB: decibel:
DNL: day-night level:
EPN: effective perceived noise:
FAA: Federal Aviation Administration:
ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization:
JPDO: Joint Planning and Development Office:
MOU: memorandum of understanding:
NAS: National Airspace System:
NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration:
NextGen: Next Generation Air Transportation System:
NRA: NASA Research Announcement:
OSTP: Office of Science and Technology Policy:
PARTNER: Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions
Reductions:
PFC: passenger facility charge:
R&D: research and development:
REDAC: Research, Engineering, and Development Advisory Committee:
United States Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
February 15, 2008:
The Honorable Mark Udall:
Chairman:
The Honorable Tom Feeney:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics:
Committee on Science and Technology:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable Jerry Costello:
Chairman:
The Honorable Thomas Petri:
Ranking Republican Member:
Subcommittee on Aviation:
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure:
House of Representatives:
Aviation noise continues to be a challenge to the operation and
expansion of the National Airspace System (NAS). Air traffic has grown
steadily over the past 5 years and is expected to continue growing as
more flights are required to carry the 1 billion passengers anticipated
by 2015. To handle the forecasted growth, the Joint Planning and
Development Office (JPDO), an interagency organization within the
Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
is working to plan a new air traffic management system, the Next
Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). Critical objectives for
NextGen are to improve the overall safety and increase the efficiency
of the NAS. Achieving these objectives will involve the implementation
of new technologies and air traffic control procedures; airspace
redesigns; and infrastructure developments, including new or expanded
runways and airports. However, community opposition to these
developments is a major challenge, largely because of concerns about
aviation noise. According to JPDO's 2007 Concept of Operations
document, current operational trends show that environmental impacts
will be the primary constraint on the capacity and flexibility of the
NAS unless these impacts are managed and mitigated. Legislative
proposals to reauthorize FAA[Footnote 1] include a number of provisions
designed to address aviation noise issues.
To address aviation noise and its impacts, the federal government
follows a "balanced approach" recommended by the International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO).[Footnote 2] This balanced approach
recognizes that short-term opportunities to mitigate the impacts of
noise on communities through noise abatement programs, the
soundproofing of residences and public buildings, and operational
restrictions on aircraft should be combined with longer-term efforts to
reduce aviation noise. Such longer-term efforts include reducing noise
at its source through more stringent noise standards and supporting
research and development (R&D) to make aircraft quieter, developing and
implementing NextGen technologies and procedures, and encouraging
compatible land use. As part of this balanced approach, FAA and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have the principal
federal responsibility for R&D to address aviation noise. FAA, through
its partnerships with universities and through JPDO, supports a broad
range of research on measuring and reducing the impacts of noise on
communities, while NASA's research program focuses on reducing noise at
its source--in aircraft engines and airframes. NASA, in partnership
with the aircraft and engine manufacturing industry, has contributed to
a number of advancements in aircraft engine and airframe technology
that have substantially reduced the amount of noise produced by
aircraft and may lead to further reductions, depending on the extent to
which current research leads to noise-reducing aircraft engine and
airframe designs and other factors. FAA and NASA have set technology
goals for reducing aviation noise. For example, FAA has set a system-
level goal of a 4 percent yearly reduction in the number of people
exposed to significant aviation noise.
You requested that we study noise and other environmental impacts of
aviation that may fundamentally constrain air transportation in the
21st century. In October 2007, we testified before the Subcommittee on
Aviation, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, on the
impacts of aviation noise on efforts to expand the capacity of airports
and the NAS.[Footnote 3] This report provides additional information on
aviation noise, focusing particularly on FAA's and NASA's R&D related
to this issue and on the ability of the two agencies to achieve their
respective noise reduction goals through their R&D on aviation noise.
Specifically, we addressed the following questions:
1. What are FAA's and NASA's R&D plans for addressing aviation noise
and to what extent are these plans aligned?
2. What are FAA's and NASA's noise reduction goals, and what is the
likelihood that the established goals will be achieved?
To determine FAA's and NASA's aviation noise R&D plans, we reviewed FAA
and NASA R&D planning documents and other information provided by these
agencies on their near-term and long-term goals. To determine the
extent to which FAA's and NASA's aviation noise-related activities are
aligned to meet noise reduction goals, we obtained and analyzed
information on mechanisms in place to coordinate noise R&D activities,
such as JPDO's Environmental Working Group and FAA's Research,
Engineering, and Development Advisory Committee (REDAC). We also
compared FAA's and NASA's R&D plans to determine whether they are
complementary and in line with JPDO's and the Executive Office of the
President's Office of Science and Technology Policy's (OSTP) plans. We
also analyzed how the agencies periodically assess the potential for
synergies or gaps in research activities. In addition, we interviewed
agency officials on the results of our analyses. To determine FAA's and
NASA's noise reduction goals and the likelihood of meeting those goals,
we reviewed FAA and NASA R&D planning documents and other information
provided by the agencies. We also interviewed agency officials to
obtain their views on the likelihood of meeting noise reduction goals
within the established time frames. Three external aviation experts
reviewed a draft of this report for accuracy and balance. We conducted
this performance audit from November 2007 through February 2008 in
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that
the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and
conclusions based on our audit objectives.
Results in Brief:
FAA's and NASA's R&D plans include a wide range of projects for
addressing aviation noise, and these activities are aligned through
partnerships and planning and coordinating mechanisms. FAA sponsors
aviation noise R&D in a number of areas, including aviation noise
measurement, the effects of aviation noise, the interrelationships
between aviation noise and emissions, and flight procedures and
technologies that can mitigate the impacts of noise on communities. FAA
sponsors much of this research through partnerships with universities;
other federal agencies, including NASA; and industry as part of its
Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction
(PARTNER) Center of Excellence.[Footnote 4] NASA is the federal agency
primarily responsible for conducting R&D to reduce the amount of noise
produced by aircraft engines and airframes. NASA's aviation noise
efforts focus on what NASA refers to as "fundamental research", a stage
of the R&D process that takes a technology to a point where it can be
further matured by manufacturers and eventually incorporated into new
aircraft or engine designs. These technologies have the potential to
make the next generations of aircraft substantially quieter than
today's aircraft--provided that industry further develop the
technologies and manufacturers integrate them into production-ready
aircraft. FAA and NASA have aligned their aviation noise R&D plans
through a number of planning and coordinating mechanisms in order to
ensure that these plans are complementary and contribute to goals for
addressing the environmental impacts of aviation, particularly as these
impacts relate to the implementation of NextGen. FAA and NASA have
participated in planning and establishing objectives for the nation's
aeronautical research through OSTP, within the Executive Office of the
President, as well as for specific research to address the
environmental impacts of NextGen as part of JPDO's Environmental
Working Group. In addition, FAA and NASA sit on the advisory board of
PARTNER, which also includes representatives from the aircraft
manufacturing industry, airlines, airports, and communities.
Furthermore, NASA is a member of FAA's REDAC, and FAA participates in
reviews of NASA's aviation noise research program. FAA's and NASA's
alignment of their aviation noise R&D activities is reflected in JPDO's
strategic plans for NextGen, which indicate how each agency's R&D
efforts will contribute to meeting goals for reducing noise and thereby
help to address an impediment to increasing the aviation system's
safety and efficiency.
In conjunction with their aligned R&D plans, FAA and NASA have set
noise reduction goals, although the likelihood that these goals will be
achieved depends on the implementation of noise reduction technologies
developed through the agencies' research and other factors. FAA
estimates that about 500,000 people in the United States are
significantly impacted by aviation noise, and, under FAA's goal, the
number of people exposed to aviation noise would decrease by 4 percent
a year through fiscal year 2012.[Footnote 5] NASA's noise goals,
established for the next three generations of aircraft, could lead to
the entry into service of successively quieter aircraft. NASA's goals
include a cumulative reduction[Footnote 6] in the effective perceived
noise (EPN)[Footnote 7] of 32 decibels (dB)--expressed as a noise
reduction of 32 EPN dB--relative to the current most stringent noise
standard, for the next generation of aircraft expected to enter service
in 2015. More aggressive NASA goals for the generations of aircraft
entering service from 2020 through 2025 and from 2030 through 2035 are
cumulative reductions of 42 EPN dB and 71 EPN dB, respectively,
relative to the standard. NASA's goals would be achieved if noise
reduction is the only aim; however, when other factors are considered,
such as the need to reduce aircraft emissions, the noise reductions
could be lower.
NASA officials stress that when NASA's research ends, it is up to
industry to develop the technologies further. Thus, aircraft and engine
manufacturers will then need to integrate the technologies into
aircraft and engine designs, and there are no guarantees that these
additional steps will be taken. According to FAA, additional funding is
needed to ensure the continued development and use of near-term
technologies to meet noise reduction goals for NextGen. To move noise
reduction technologies beyond NASA's stage of development, the House
fiscal year 2007 reauthorization proposal for FAA includes the
Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise (CLEEN) initiative, which
would create a program for the development, maturation, and
certification of airframe technologies for aircraft over the next 10
years to reduce aviation noise and emissions.[Footnote 8] According to
FAA, the program, in which NASA will participate as an adviser, is
intended to accelerate near-term technology maturation and to
demonstrate to aircraft and engine manufacturers the readiness of these
technologies for incorporation into new aircraft and engine designs.
Concern about other environmental problems, such as global warming and
air quality, may also limit the likelihood of achieving FAA's and
NASA's noise reduction goals, since it will be technologically
challenging to design aircraft with reduced noise while, at the same
time, achieving the significant reductions in greenhouse gases and
other emissions that will be required. Furthermore, even if R&D efforts
do lead to next generation aircraft that meet NASA's noise reduction
goals, integrating these quieter aircraft into the fleet to the extent
that they have a significant impact on noise reduction will be a
challenge. Aircraft have a lifespan of about 30 years, and many of the
aircraft in the current fleet are expected to be in operation for many
years to come. In addition, the financial pressures facing many
airlines will make it difficult for them to upgrade their fleets with
new, quieter aircraft. Failure to achieve FAA's and NASA's noise
reduction goals could have implications for the implementation of
NextGen, because continued noise problems at airports could constrain
efforts to increase the safety and efficiency of the NAS--a key
component of the NextGen strategy.
We provided a draft of this report to the Department of Transportation
and NASA for review and comment and neither had comments.
FAA and NASA Use Partnerships and Planning and Coordinating Mechanisms
to Align R&D on Noise Reduction:
FAA presently supports aviation noise R&D primarily in the areas of
measuring and mitigating the impacts of aviation noise, while NASA
focuses its efforts on technologies for reducing noise from aircraft
engines and airframes, and the two agencies align their activities
through partnerships and planning and coordinating mechanisms.
FAA Supports Aviation Noise R&D Primarily through Partnerships with
NASA, Academic Institutions, and the Aviation Industry:
FAA's support of aviation noise R&D is part of its overall
responsibility for reducing the impacts of aviation noise. In addition
to R&D activities, FAA supports airports' efforts to mitigate aviation
noise mainly through its voluntary noise compatibility program, known
as the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program,[Footnote 9] which provides
guidance to airports on how to develop noise compatibility plans to
mitigate noise on and around airports.[Footnote 10] FAA also
administers grants through the Part 150 program that airports can use
for noise mitigation efforts in areas exposed to significant aviation
noise, defined as a 65 decibel day- night level (DNL 65 dB).[Footnote
11]
Airports that participate in the Part 150 program can receive noise set-
aside funds from the Airport Improvement Program (AIP),[Footnote 12]
which they must match to varying degrees, depending on their
size.[Footnote 13] These funds can be used to, among other things,
develop plans for noise mitigation, soundproof buildings, and support
relocation by acquiring homes in areas with significant noise.
According to FAA, it has provided about $5 billion in AIP grants, and
airports have used about $2.8 billion in passenger facilities charges
(PFC)[Footnote 14] for Part 150 noise mitigation studies and projects.
In total, this funding amounts to nearly $8 billion for fiscal years
1982 through 2007 (see table 1).
Table 1: AIP and PFC Investments for Noise-Related Purposes for Fiscal
Years 1982-2007:
Dollars in millions.
AIP Funds: Mitigation measures for residences;
Funding: $1,903.
AIP Funds: Land acquisition;
Funding: 2,170.
AIP Funds: Noise monitoring system;
Funding: 170.
AIP Funds: Mitigation measures for public buildings;
Funding: 703.
AIP Funds: Noise compatibility plan;
Funding: 87.
Total AIP funds;
Funding: $5,033.
PFC funds: Multiphase;
Funding: $1,283.
PFC funds: Land acquisition;
Funding: 481.
PFC funds: Soundproofing;
Funding: 1,018.
PFC funds: Monitoring;
Funding: 31.
PFC funds: Planning;
Funding: 15.
Total PFC funds;
Funding: $2,828.
Grand total;
Funding: $7,861.
Source: FAA.
[End of table]
FAA sponsors aviation noise R&D in a number of areas, including
aviation noise measurement, the effects of aviation noise, the
interrelationships between aviation noise and emissions, and flight
procedures and technologies that can mitigate the impacts of noise on
communities. FAA sponsors much of this research through partnerships
with universities, other federal agencies, and industry. University
research is generally part of FAA's Air Transportation Centers of
Excellence program. One of these Centers of Excellence, PARTNER, has
conducted numerous noise-related R&D projects. See appendix I for a
list of PARTNER participants and projects. PARTNER is a cooperative
research organization that includes 10 collaborating universities and
approximately 50 advisory board members who represent aerospace
manufacturers, airlines, airports, state and local governments, and
professional and community groups. NASA, along with FAA and Transport
Canada,[Footnote 15] is a sponsor of PARTNER. The collaborating
universities and organizations represented on the advisory board
provide equal matches for federal funds for research and other
activities.
PARTNER projects related to aviation noise involve identifying a means
to reduce aircraft landing noise, assessing the human health and
welfare risks of aviation noise, developing online resources to better
inform the public about aviation noise issues, and testing alternative
aircraft descent patterns. For example, researchers are developing an
integrated suite of three analytical tools--the Environmental Design
Space, the Aviation Environmental Design Tool, and the Aviation
Environmental Portfolio Management Tool--that can be used to identify
interrelationships between noise and emissions. Data from these three
tools will allow for assessing the costs and benefits of aviation
environmental policy options. PARTNER has also designed and flight
tested a nighttime Continuous Descent Arrival (CDA) procedure for the
Louisville International Airport.[Footnote 16] This procedure is
expected to allow aircraft to remain at cruise altitudes longer as they
approach destination airports, use lower power levels, and thereby
lower noise and emissions during landings. United Parcel Service plans
to begin using the CDA procedure for its operations at Louisville
International Airport in the near future. Other PARTNER projects
include an effort to assess sonic booms from a new supersonic business
aircraft and studies to better understand land use, development, and
aviation noise around airports.
FAA also supports research efforts at the Department of
Transportation's Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. The
Volpe Center provides research and support for the Integrated Noise
Model, which airports use to model aviation noise at airports. Noise
mitigation measures, such as residential soundproofing, are based on
the noise contour maps generated by this model. The Volpe Center also
conducts noise modeling studies. For example, it has conducted studies
of aviation noise over the Grand Canyon in Arizona and over Bryce
Canyon in Utah. FAA also has contracts with other entities such as Wyle
Labs and Aerodyne Research to improve noise measurement through
modeling. For example, Wyle Labs performs work on the Model for
Assessing Global Exposure to the Noise of Transport Aircraft, which
estimates the global population exposed to noise and the effects of
different mitigation scenarios. During the last decade, FAA has spent
about $43 million to support aviation noise R&D (see table 2).
Table 2: FAA Funds for R&D Efforts in Fiscal Years 1997-2007:
Fiscal Year: 1997;
Volpe Center: $770,000;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: $1,121,150.
Fiscal Year: 1998;
Volpe Center: 841,000;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: 1,654,000.
Fiscal Year: 1999;
Volpe Center: 737,500;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: 473,817.
Fiscal Year: 2000;
Volpe Center: 1,040,000;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: 577,000.
Fiscal Year: 2001;
Volpe Center: 1,100,000;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: 430,000.
Fiscal Year: 2002;
Volpe Center: 889,000;
PARTNER: [Empty];
Other: 869,000.
Fiscal Year: 2003;
Volpe Center: 1,560,000;
PARTNER: $1,775,000;
Other: 1,002,000.
Fiscal Year: 2004;
Volpe Center: 1,231,000;
PARTNER: 1,200,000;
Other: 1,740,000.
Fiscal Year: 2005;
Volpe Center: 1,962,750;
PARTNER: 1,651,250;
Other: 3,134,527.
Fiscal Year: 2006;
Volpe Center: 2,349,750;
PARTNER: 3,378,657;
Other: 2,875,750.
Fiscal Year: 2007;
Volpe Center: 2,432,750;
PARTNER: 3,361,500;
Other: 2,819,859.
Fiscal Year: Total;
Volpe Center: $14,913,750;
PARTNER: $11,366,407;
Other: $16,697,103.
Source: FAA.
[End of table]
NASA's R&D Efforts Focus on Reducing Noise from Aircraft Engines and
Airframes:
NASA's efforts in the area of aviation noise are part of its overall
aeronautical R&D program. NASA reorganized its aeronautical research
plan in 2005 to focus on what it calls "fundamental research," which
takes a technology to a point where it can be further matured by
manufacturers and eventually integrated into new aircraft or engine
designs. According to NASA, fundamental research includes (1)
foundational research, which is the lowest level of the research
pyramid on which advanced noise reduction technologies can be built;
(2) discipline-level fundamental research, which includes the
development of noise prediction methods that can be used to understand
the noise reduction potential of various concepts; (3) multidiscipline-
level fundamental research, which includes studying the trade-offs
between noise, emissions, and performance that must be understood in
order to determine the performance characteristics of a new aircraft;
and (4) system-level fundamental research, which includes exploring
research issues of interest to manufacturers when noise reduction
technologies are integrated into a new aircraft and can include major
wind-tunnel and flight tests. Figure 1 illustrates NASA's research
approach and shows that foundational research serves as the basis for
the development of technologies and tools that can later be integrated
into aviation subsystems and systems.
Figure 1: NASA's Research Approach Triangle:
This figure is a triangle showing NASA's research approach triangle.
From top to bottom, the text is:
Multi-Disciplinary Analysis and Optimization Development,Validation and
Application: System Level;
Subsystem Integration, Test and Validation: Multi-Discipline;
Technologies and Tool Development: Single-Discipline;
Foundational Research: Basic Research.
The arrow pointing up reads:
NASA In-house Research: Knowledge and Capabilities.
The arrow pointing down reads:
Industry and Other Government Agency Cooperative Agreements: NASA
Research Announcement Funded Research: Requirements and Needs.
[See PDF for image]
Source: GAO and NASA.
[End of figure]
NASA's research on aviation noise focuses on noise emitted by aircraft
and emphasizes the development of noise prediction methods, diagnostic
methods for determining noise sources, and noise reduction methods that
are applicable across a range of aircraft. NASA's R&D plan is
structured around reducing noise from three generations of aircraft, or
vehicles, categorized as "N+1,"[Footnote 17] to be implemented by 2015;
"N+2," to be implemented between 2020 and 2025;[Footnote 18] and "N+3,"
to be implemented between 2030 and 2035. N+1 R&D focuses on one of the
main sources of aviation noise--aircraft engines--by addressing fan
noise as well as parts of the airframe that produce noise, such as
landing gear and flap sides. For the N+2 generation of aircraft, NASA
intends to develop tools and technologies that more closely integrate
the airframe with the propulsion system through such means as the
blended wing body concept. This concept, which calls for mounting the
engines above the wings, would allow the airframe to shield and thereby
reduce the effects of engine noise. The N+3 generation of aircraft,
according to NASA, will have further dramatic reductions in noise and
emissions and improvements in performance. A request for proposal for
N+3 is expected in the spring of 2008, with the objective of soliciting
potential aircraft solutions and identifying key driving technologies
for fundamental research investments. NASA states that noise reductions
for N+2 and N+3 aircraft will depend strongly on the fundamental
research that is carried out today. These NASA research efforts are
also aimed at reducing emissions and fuel consumption, which in
combination with noise reductions would help mitigate the environmental
effects of future increases in air traffic.
NASA is also working with others in the aeronautics research community
on other advanced designs, such as the "silent aircraft" concept that
was created by researchers from Cambridge University in Great Britain
and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. According to NASA, about
$58 million of the fiscal year 2007 subsonic fixed-wing research budget
was directed toward noise-related research.
In addition, NASA funds noise research conducted by outside
organizations. According to NASA, it sponsors research by universities
and companies for its Fundamental Aeronautics Program through NASA
Research Announcements (NRA). NASA officials note that the agency has
made 215 NRA awards ranging from $100,000 a year to $1.5 million a year
since December 2007, and that many of these awards were directed toward
noise generation, propagation, and mitigation.
Participation in Advisory, Planning, and Coordinating Bodies Helps FAA
and NASA Align and Monitor Their Aviation Noise R&D Plans:
FAA and NASA have taken advantage of a number of mechanisms to align
their aviation noise R&D plans. According to officials from both
agencies, their collaboration in PARTNER is one of the ways they align
their aviation noise R&D activities. Both FAA and NASA are members of
the advisory board for PARTNER, along with representatives from
aerospace manufacturers; airlines; airports; national, state, and local
governments; professional associations; and community groups. The
advisory board participates in strategic planning for PARTNER and
semiannual reviews of the center's research plan to ensure, among other
things, that the plan addresses national and international issues,
including those related to aviation noise.
FAA and NASA also seek to align their aviation noise research plans
through participation in formal reviews of each other's aviation noise
research efforts. FAA representatives participate on NASA review panels
to assess the technical quality, performance, and relevance of NASA
research programs. In return, NASA participates in FAA's REDAC, which
is responsible for coordinating FAA's research, engineering, and
development activities with those of industry and other government
agencies. REDAC was established in 1989 to advise the FAA Administrator
on R&D needs in air traffic services; airport technology; aircraft
safety; human factors; and environmental issues, including aviation
noise. NASA's Associate Administrator for Aeronautics Research is a
member of REDAC, as are representatives from NASA's research programs
in aeronautics who serve on the committee's subcommittees.[Footnote 19]
FAA's Director of the Office of Aviation Research is currently the
Executive Director of REDAC.
Another key component of FAA's and NASA's efforts to align their
aviation noise R&D plans, according to officials from both agencies, is
their participation in JPDO's planning for NextGen. Both agencies are
members of JPDO's Environmental Working Group,[Footnote 20] which is
headed by the FAA Director of the Office of Environment and Energy.
NASA chairs the Environmental Working Group's Technology Standing
Committee, which focuses on the development of technologies to lessen
NextGen's environmental impacts.
According to FAA and NASA officials, the mechanisms in place to align
their agencies' aviation noise R&D plans enable the two agencies and
other stakeholders to periodically assess the potential for synergies
or gaps in the agencies' research activities. FAA's and NASA's aviation
noise plans focus on different aspects of aviation noise. As we have
previously noted, most of FAA's R&D activities are presently
concentrated on measuring and mitigating the impacts of aviation noise,
whereas NASA's R&D centers on developing technologies to reduce noise
from aircraft engines and airframes. Both agencies' participation in
JPDO's Environmental Working Group and in REDAC and FAA's participation
in NASA program reviews create opportunities for FAA and NASA to
determine what adjustments in aviation noise R&D are needed to meet
goals for reducing or mitigating the impacts of aviation noise. For
example, the Environmental Working Group's analysis determined that
more near-term demonstration of noise reduction technologies on
aircraft was needed. According to FAA, the CLEEN proposal in the
administration's reauthorization bill, which will be discussed later in
this report, addresses this gap.
The extent to which FAA's and NASA's aviation noise R&D plans are
aligned is indicated in JPDO's strategic plans for NextGen, which serve
as a blueprint for improving the nation's aviation system. These plans
show how each agency's R&D efforts will contribute toward meeting goals
for reducing noise. Meeting these goals is critical for the success of
NextGen because aviation noise is a major impediment to increasing the
capacity of the NAS. JPDO's goal is to reduce the impacts of
significant aviation noise (defined as DNL 65 dB) on communities
despite the predicted growth in air traffic. Specifically, the
Technology Standing Committee of the Environmental Working Group seeks
to ensure the development of technologies to contribute to reducing the
impact of aviation noise on communities. According to NASA, the
technologies it is developing under its current aviation noise R&D
program, if implemented in new generations of aircraft, would
significantly contribute toward meeting this goal.
The alignment of FAA's and NASA's aviation noise research plans is also
reflected in the national aeronautics research plan issued by OSTP in
December 2007.[Footnote 21] This plan, to which FAA and NASA
contributed, outlines environmental goals that are aligned with JPDO's.
In line with the JPDO Environmental Working Group's goal, the national
plan states that the "environmental footprint of aviation must continue
to shrink, even while accounting for an anticipated two to three times
growth in capacity of the U.S. aviation system by 2025." The national
plan includes FAA and NASA goals for aviation noise research. For
example, the plan's near-term goals include researching and developing
air traffic control procedures to reduce noise and developing improved
tools and metrics to quantify and characterize aviation's environmental
impacts. Long-term goals include developing new approaches and models
for optimizing ground and air operational procedures. In addition, the
technologies under development or planned for NASA's N+1, N+2, and N+3
programs are included in the national plan.
FAA and NASA have formalized their efforts to align their aviation
noise R&D plans through memorandums of understanding (MOU) on R&D since
October 9, 1998, with the latest dated May 2006.[Footnote 22] The most
recent MOU describes how the agencies will coordinate their R&D efforts
through the FAA/NASA Executive Research Steering Committee, which is co-
chaired by the agencies, with selected members from FAA and NASA
offices involved with research programs. According to the MOU, this
committee ensures that complementary aviation and space transportation
goals are defined for FAA and NASA and reflect each agency's mission.
The MOU further states that the two agencies will acknowledge and
support their goals, coordinate their planning and resources to achieve
the goals when appropriate, and monitor progress toward the goals and
propose changes on the basis of changing requirements.
FAA and NASA Have Established Noise Reduction Technology Goals, but R&D
Funding Issues and Other Factors Make the Achievement of Noise
Reduction Goals Uncertain:
FAA has established a goal for reducing the number of people exposed to
significant noise from aircraft, while FAA and NASA have set goals for
reducing noise from aircraft through technology development. However,
questions about the sufficiency of federal funding for these efforts,
the extent of government and industry participation in the later-stage
development of noise reduction technologies, and airlines' ability to
incorporate the technologies in the near term make the achievement of
FAA's and NASA's noise goals uncertain. Failing to achieve these goals
could stall the implementation of NextGen, because continued noise
problems at airports could constrain its expansion.
FAA and NASA Have Set Goals for Reducing Aviation Noise through New
Technologies:
FAA has established a target for reducing the number of people exposed
to significant noise from aircraft, while FAA and NASA have set targets
for noise reductions in aircraft to be achieved through technology
development. FAA estimates that about 500,000 people in the United
States are currently affected by significant aviation noise, defined as
DNL 65 dB or greater, and has set a goal of reducing this number by 4
percent for each year through fiscal year 2012. The annual 4 percent
reduction goal is an increase over FAA's previous goal of an annual 1
percent reduction in the population exposed to significant aviation
noise. According to FAA, the 1 percent goal was exceeded in fiscal year
2006 when the percentage of people exposed to significant noise
decreased by 28 percent relative to the 3-year average for calendar
years 2000 through 2002. FAA stated that the main contributor to the
decrease in population exposed to significant noise is the early
retirement of older, noisier aircraft primarily as the result of the
air traffic downturn in the aftermath of the events of September 11,
2001, and fuel inefficiency reasons.
FAA has also set a goal that would more directly indicate the
contribution of R&D to reducing aviation noise. FAA's 2007 National
Aviation Research Plan qualitatively spells out R&D goals up to 2015.
According to this plan, FAA's goal is to demonstrate that aviation
noise can be significantly reduced to cost-effectively expand up to
three times the current capacity of the air traffic system. FAA R&D
activities from 2009 through 2013 to achieve these goals include (1)
measuring current levels of aviation-related noise and emissions, (2)
determining acceptable levels of noise and emissions, (3) developing
models to predict the impact and benefits of changes, and (4)
developing noise-and emission-reduction methods. Current activities are
being conducted by PARTNER and the Volpe Center in collaboration with
various industry stakeholders.
NASA has established what it considers to be aggressive technology
goals for its aviation noise R&D program that could be incorporated
into aircraft. Under these goals, new technologies would be developed
and incorporated in three succeeding generations of new aircraft, as we
discussed in the preceding section of this report, thereby increasingly
reducing what is known as EPN. NASA's goals include a cumulative noise
reduction of 32 EPN dB relative to the most current Chapter 4 noise
standard[Footnote 23] for the next generation of aircraft, the N+1
generation,[Footnote 24] and this goal would be achieved by 2015. Next,
noise from the N+2 generation of aircraft would be reduced to 42 EPN dB
below the Chapter 4 standard, and this goal would be met between 2020
and 2025. Finally, noise from the N+3 generation of aircraft would
decline to 71 EPN dB below the Chapter 4 standard during the period
from about 2030 through 2035, thereby achieving NASA's third noise
reduction goal. Aviation noise would be reduced to the extent NASA
predicts through the technologies it is researching if noise reduction
were the only goal. However, when efforts are also made to achieve
other goals, such as to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, noise
reductions may be lower. FAA and the other members of JPDO's
Environmental Working Group have incorporated NASA's aviation noise
reduction goals in NextGen plans for reducing the environmental impacts
of aviation. Table 3 identifies the time frames, goals, and research
projects planned for NASA's N+X generation aircraft program.
Table 3: NASA's N+X Generation Aircraft Program:
Program name: Time frame;
N+1 generation: By 2015;
N+2 generation: Between 2020 and 2025;
N+3 generation: Between 2030 and 2035.
Program name: Noise level[A];
N+1 generation: -32 EPN dB;
N+2 generation: -42 EPN dB;
N+3 generation: -71 EPN dB or greater.
Program name: Research projects;
N+1 generation: Engine noise reduction technologies;
Airframe noise source;
Investigation and mitigation study;
N+2 generation: SAX-40 aircraft concept;
Aerodynamics and acoustic testing;
Predictive capabilities for subsonic aircraft;
Pulsed circulation control;
Plasma actuators for landing gear and high-lift side edges;
N+3 generation: NASA to solicit proposals in spring 2008.
Sources: GAO and NASA.
[A] Cumulative reduction below Chapter 4 standards.
[End of table]
Meeting Noise Reduction Goals Is Uncertain Because of Questions about
Federal R&D Funding, Government and Industry Participation, and Airline
Investment Resources:
Despite efforts by FAA and NASA, to align aviation noise and other
environmentally related R&D, concerns have arisen about whether the
resources devoted to near-term R&D will be sufficient to achieve noise
reduction goals for aircraft engines and airframes within the NextGen
time frame. According to FAA, more funding is needed to mature noise
reduction technologies beyond NASA's research efforts. FAA is
attempting to address this funding need through its proposed CLEEN
consortium.
Federal funding for aviation noise research has declined over the past
decade, particularly for NASA, which provides most of the federal
funding for aeronautics research, the category that includes aviation
noise research. NASA's budget for aeronautics research has dropped by
about one-half over the past decade and is about $717 million for
fiscal year 2007. According to NASA, about $58 million of this funding
goes toward noise-related research for subsonic fixed-wing aircraft.
This downward trend contributed to NASA's decision, previously
discussed in this report, to refocus its aeronautical research plan on
the earlier stages of the R&D process.
According to FAA, most of the federal funding available for mitigating
aviation noise is targeted to the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program
for soundproofing buildings around airports and acquiring or relocating
properties that are exposed to high levels of aviation noise. In a 2002
report on reducing the environmental impacts of aviation, the National
Research Council's Committee on Aeronautics Research and Technology for
Environmental Compatibility[Footnote 25] noted that the vast majority
of federal expenditures on aviation noise is allocated to noise
abatement at individual airports rather than to research on quieter
aircraft and engines, which could ultimately lead to reductions in
aviation noise nationally and internationally. The report concluded
that the funding for federal research programs was too low to remove
noise as an impediment to the growth of aviation--a conclusion that FAA
reiterated in a 2004 report to Congress on aviation and the
environment.[Footnote 26]
According to FAA, the administration is attempting to address the
shortfall in aviation noise R&D spending in its proposal for
reauthorizing FAA programs by seeking funding for programs to mature
technologies that NASA and others originally developed. FAA officials
stated that the proposed CLEEN Engine and Airframe Technology
Partnership, for which the administration is seeking $111 million
through fiscal year 2011, is intended to provide earlier maturation of
aviation noise and emission reduction technologies while NASA focuses
on longer-term fundamental research on noise and emissions. The CLEEN
partnership, which is also in the House reauthorization bill, would
create a program for the development, maturation, and certification of
engine and airframe technologies for aircraft over the next 10 years to
reduce aviation noise and emissions. The proposals would require the
FAA Administrator to establish an objective of developing aircraft
technology that would be certified for incorporation into current
aircraft models, resulting in a cumulative noise reduction of 32 EPN dB
below ICAO's Chapter 4 standards, which is the same as the goal NASA
has set for its N+1 aviation noise R&D program. CLEEN would establish a
research consortium of government, industry, and academic participants
that would allow for the maturation of aviation noise technologies via
demonstration projects for further refinement by the aviation industry
and eventual incorporation into new aircraft designs. The proposal
would also require the Administrator to set objectives for developing
certifiable aircraft engine technologies for substantially reducing
emissions. Because NASA's current focus is on fundamental research to
develop system-level technologies, the CLEEN proposal would not overlap
with NASA's R&D efforts. According to FAA, if the proposed program is
authorized and funded at the requested level, FAA has reasonable
confidence that noise goals will be achieved.
NASA and FAA officials said they are making progress in meeting their
noise reduction goals. NASA officials stated that NASA is progressing
toward developing technologies that can be implemented in next
generation aircraft engines and can meet the noise reduction goals set
for N+1. For example, NASA has established a partnership with Pratt &
Whitney to demonstrate the benefits of a technology that would reduce
noise. NASA and FAA have also worked with Boeing to demonstrate
airframe and engine noise reduction technologies on a Boeing 777. FAA
stated, and we have confirmed, that FAA has met its 2007 noise
reduction goals through September 2007.
However, even with additional funding for aviation noise R&D, such as
the amounts included in the CLEEN proposal, achieving FAA's and NASA's
aviation noise goals for reducing noise from aircraft engines and
airframes will remain a challenge because of uncertainties about the
ability of aircraft engine and aircraft manufacturers to incorporate
new noise reduction technologies into new engine and aircraft designs,
and the need to consider trade-offs between noise reductions and
reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases. NASA officials stressed
that when NASA's research ends, it will be up to engine and aircraft
manufacturers to take the next steps to integrate the noise reduction
technologies into engine and aircraft designs, and the manufacturers'
willingness to do so is not guaranteed. In addition, an expert we
consulted noted that if manufacturers do take the steps to integrate
noise reduction technologies into new designs, the pace of noise
reduction will also depend on the pace of development for new aircraft
and aircraft engine designs. According to FAA, the CLEEN proposal is to
demonstrate to manufacturers that technologies initially developed by
NASA and others are ready to be incorporated into new aircraft and
engine designs. However, it is uncertain whether the CLEEN proposal, if
adopted, would be sufficient to achieve this objective. Concern about
other environmental problems, such as global warming and air quality,
may also limit the likelihood of achieving FAA's and NASA's noise
reduction goals, since it may be technologically challenging to design
aircraft with reduced noise while, at the same time, achieving the
significant reductions in greenhouse gases and other emissions that
will be required. Although it is possible to design engines that
produce less noise and fewer greenhouse gas emissions, the reductions
in greenhouse gases could be limited in engines that produce
substantially less noise. Furthermore, engines that burn less fuel are
less costly to operate. As a result, air carriers may not be inclined
to buy jets with engines that reduce noise but may be more expensive to
operate.
If R&D efforts lead to advancements in noise reduction technologies
that can be incorporated in new aircraft in the near future, it is
uncertain whether these advancements will contribute toward meeting
FAA's goals for reducing the number of people exposed to significant
noise. As we noted in our recent testimony on aviation noise,[Footnote
27] implementing new noise reduction technologies, whether by
integrating new, quieter aircraft into the fleet or by retrofitting
aircraft, poses financial challenges for the aviation industry.
Aircraft have an average lifespan of about 30 years, and airlines can
take almost that entire period to pay for an aircraft. The current
fleet is, on average, about half as many years old--11 years for wide-
body aircraft and 14 years for narrow-body aircraft--and therefore, is
expected to be in operation for many years to come. In addition, the
financial pressures facing many airlines make it difficult for them to
upgrade their fleets with new, state-of-the-art quieter aircraft, such
as the Boeing 787 and Airbus A380. Currently, for example, U.S.
carriers have placed a small proportion of the over 700 orders (40, or
less than 6 percent) that Boeing officials say the company has received
for its 787 model. Furthermore, no U.S. carriers have placed orders for
the new Airbus A380, which is the world's largest passenger aircraft.
According to Airbus, the A380 produces significantly less noise than
other large passenger aircraft currently in service.
Failure to meet the aviation noise reduction goals outlined in FAA's
and NASA's R&D plans could have significant implications for the
implementation of NextGen. According to FAA, it generally takes 12 to
15 years to implement new technology on aircraft, and, therefore,
NextGen technologies must be brought to maturity soon to meet the 2025
goal for implementing NextGen. According to FAA, without additional
funding such as that proposed for CLEEN, near-term noise reduction
goals may not be attained. However, if the technologies are developed
that allow the goals to be met, FAA may also need to consider how to
encourage airlines to introduce quieter aircraft into their fleets as
well as to retrofit existing aircraft with new equipment such as the
satellite-based Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)
navigational system, which can allow aircraft to make more efficient,
quieter approaches and descents. One way would be to offer operational
advantages such as preferred takeoff and landing slots to quieter
aircraft or aircraft equipped with ADS-B. Without significant noise
reductions around the nation's airports, efforts to expand their
capacity could be stalled and the implementation of NextGen delayed,
thereby limiting FAA's ability to efficiently manage the forecasted
growth in air traffic.
Agency Comments:
We provided copies of a draft of this report to the Department of
Transportation and NASA for review and comment (see app. II). Both
agencies had no comments. FAA and NASA did provide technical
clarifications, which we incorporated into the report as appropriate.
As agreed with your offices, unless you publicly announce the contents
of the report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days
from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies of the
report to interested congressional committees, the Secretary of
Transportation, the Administrator of the FAA, and the Administrator of
NASA. We will also make copies available to others upon request. In
addition, the report will be made available at no charge on the GAO Web
site at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov].
If you or your staffs have any questions about this report, please
contact me at (202) 512-2834 or dillinghamg@gao.gov. Contact points for
our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found
on the last page of this report. Individuals making key contributions
to this report are listed in appendix III.
Signed by:
Gerald L. Dillingham, Ph.D.:
Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues:
[End of section]
Appendix I: PARTNER Participants and Projects:
Collaborating Universities:
Boise State University:
Georgia Institute of Technology:
Harvard University:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology:
Pennsylvania State University:
Purdue University:
Stanford University:
University of Missouri at Rolla:
University of North Carolina:
York University:
Advisory Board Members:
Aerodyne Research Aerospace Industries Association:
Airbus:
Air Line Pilots Association:
Air Transport Association of America:
Airports Council International – North America:
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics:
Bay Area Air Quality Management District:
Bell Helicopter Textron:
Boeing:
Bombardier Aerospace:
Cessna Aircraft:
Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative:
CSSI:
Delta Airlines:
Environmental Compatible Air Transport System:
FAA Airports and Environmental Law Division:
FAA Air Traffic Environmental Programs Division:
FAA Airport Planning, Community and Environmental Needs Division:
FAA Centers of Excellence:
FAA Flight Standards:
FAA Office of Environment and Energy:
General Electric Aircraft Engines:
Gulfstream Aerospace:
Harris Miller Miller & Hanson:
Indiana Department of Transportation:
International Airline Passengers Association:
Larry Finegold & Son, Consultants:
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics:
Logistics Management Institute:
Massachusetts Port Authority:
Metron Aviation:
Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority:
NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate:
NASA Science Mission Directorate:
National Organization to Insure a Sound Controlled Environment:
O‘Hare Noise Compatibility Commission:
Omega:
Palisades Citizens Association:
Pratt & Whitney:
Raisbeck Engineering:
Rannoch Corp.:
Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County:
Rolls Royce:
San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable:
Sikorsky Aircraft:
SNECMA:
Transport Canada:
United Parcel Service:
U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center:
U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory:
Wyle Laboratories:
PARTNER Projects:
Airport Surface Movement Optimization:
Alternative Fuels:
Continuous Descent Arrival:
En Route Traffic Optimization to Reduce Environmental Impact:
Emissions Atmospheric Research:
Emissions Characteristics of Alternative Aviation Fuels:
Energy Policy Act Study:
Environmental Design Space:
Health Effects of Aircraft Noise:
Health Impacts of Aviation-Related Air Pollutants:
Investigation of Aviation Emissions Air Quality Impacts:
Land Use Management and Airport Controls (project completed):
Lateral Alignment in Complex Systems (project completed):
Low Frequency Noise Study (project completed):
Measurement of Emissions:
Network Restructuring Scenarios for ATO Forecasts:
NoiseQuest:
Quantifying and Mitigating the Impact of Noise on People:
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums (project completed):
Sonic Boom Mitigation:
Valuation and Trade-offs of Policy Options:
[End of section]
Appendix II: NASA Letter to GAO:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration:
Headquarters:
Washington, DC 20546-0001:
February 5, 2008:
Reply to Attn of: Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate:
Gerald L. Dillingham, Ph. D.:
Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues:
Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
Dear Dr. Dillingham:
Thank you for the opportunity to review your draft report entitled,
"Aviation and the Environment," (GAO-08-384). This draft report
contains no recommendation to NASA and we are not providing comments
via separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, please
contact Juan Alonso at (202) 358-1216.
Sincerely,
Signed by:
Dr. Jaiwon Shin
Associate Administrator for Aeronautics Research:
[End of section]
Appendix III: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgements:
GAO Contact: Gerald L. Dillingham, Ph.D., (202) 512-2834 or
dillinghamg@gao.gov:
Staff Acknowledgements: In addition to the contact named above, Ed
Laughlin (Assistant Director), Elizabeth Eisenstadt, Rosa Leung, and
Maureen Luna-Long made key contributions to this report.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] H.R. 2881 and S. 1300.
[2] ICAO is an advisory organization affiliated with the United Nations
that aims to promote the establishment of international civil aviation
standards and recommended practices and procedures.
[3] GAO, Aviation and the Environment: Impact of Aviation Noise on
Communities Presents Challenges for Airport Operations and Future
Growth of the National Airspace System, GAO-08-216T (Washington, D.C.:
Oct. 24, 2007).
[4] FAA Centers of Excellence are FAA partnerships with universities
and affiliated industry associations and businesses throughout the
country that conduct aviation research in a number of areas, including
advanced materials, aircraft noise and emissions, and airworthiness.
[5] This goal is measured by a 3-year moving average for calendar years
2000 through 2002. In fiscal year 2007, the noise exposure goal was
revised from a 1 percent to a 4 percent cumulative reduction per year
in the number of people exposed to significant aviation noise.
[6] The NASA goals are cumulative decreases that are obtained by adding
together the decreases in an aircraft‘s maximum noise levels at take
off, flyover, and approach.
[7] EPN is the noise measure used to establish compliance with noise
certification standards.
[8] A similar provision is in the Senate bill for FAA reauthorization.
As of the date of this publication, the House and Senate are discussing
the reauthorization bills.
[9] 14 CFR 150.
[10] As part of its environmental responsibilities, FAA also works
through ICAO to foster international environmental standards, including
those for noise, as well as recommended practices and guidance
materials.
[11] The impact of aviation noise is usually analyzed in terms of the
extent to which the noise annoys people by interfering with their
normal activities, such as sleep, relaxation, speech, television
viewing, and school and business operations. The generally accepted
model for assessing the effects of long-term noise exposure is based on
a correlation of the day-night average sound level, DNL, to the
percentage of population highly annoyed by recurring noise sound
events. DNL is a noise descriptor or metric that takes into account the
magnitude of the sound levels of all individual events that occur
during a 24-hour period, the number of events, and an increased
sensitivity to noise during typical sleeping hours (between 10:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m.). The correlation shows that the percentage of people
highly annoyed by noise exposure increases significantly above DNL 65
dB. Some aviation noise consultants have noted disadvantages of DNL as
a metric to measure noise and suggest the use of supplemental metrics
that measure the frequency and intensity of individual noise events
that may provide a more adequate measure of aviation noise as
experienced by people. Some airports have included supplemental
analysis such as the Number of events Above and the Time Above, within
their noise studies. FAA requires the use of DNL for airport analysis
but also allows for the use of supplemental metrics.
[12] The AIP program provides federal funds for development projects at
the entire range of the nation‘s 3,400 airports”from small general
aviation airports to the very largest airports that handle several
million passengers per year.
[13] According to FAA, noise projects are eligible for 80 percent
funding under AIP for large- and medium-hub airports and 95 percent
funding at small, nonhub, general aviation, and reliever airports.
[14] PFCs are fees that airports can charge passengers to fund FAA-
approved projects. Not all airports charge these fees.
[15] Transport Canada is the department within the government of Canada
that is responsible for developing policies, regulations, and services
for the Canadian transportation system.
[16] John-Paul Clarke, et al., Partnership for Air Transportation and
Emissions Reduction Development, Design and Flight Test Evaluation of a
Continuous Descent Approach Procedure for Nighttime Operation at
Louisville International Airport (Cambridge, MA: Jan. 9, 2006).
[17] ’N“ refers to the current generation of tube-and-wing aircraft
entering into service in 2008 such as the Boeing 787.
[18] According to NASA estimates, the introduction of N+2 vehicles for
Initial Operational Capability for military or cargo vehicles would be
around 2020, and Entry Into Service for commercial vehicles would be
around 2025.
[19] The four NASA aeronautics research programs are the Fundamental
Aeronautics Program, the Airspace Systems Program, the Aviation Safety
Program, and the Aeronautics Test Program.
[20] JPDO has restructured its Integrated Product Teams into Working
Groups. Nevertheless, FAA and NASA continue to collaborate in the same
roles and according to the Integrated Work Plan.
[21] OSTP‘s charter is to advise the President on the effects of
science and technology on domestic and international affairs and to
lead interagency efforts to develop and implement science and
technology policies and budgets. OSTP‘s plan, National Plan for
Aeronautics Research and Development and Related Infrastructure by the
National Science and Technology Council (December 2007), establishes
national research priorities, objectives, and schedules to achieve the
identified objectives by 2020.
[22] Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Concerning A Partnership to Achieve Goals in Aviation
and Space Transportation (May 15, 2006).
[23] In July, 2005, FAA issued a Federal Aviation Regulation (14 CFR
36.103 and 91.801-91.877) requiring that all new aircraft designs be
subject to the current, more stringent ICAO noise standards, know as
Chapter 4 (known as Stage 4 standards in the regulation). Specifically,
any new aircraft whose design was submitted to FAA for approval on or
after January 1, 2006, must meet these standards adopted by ICAO in
2001. The less stringent Chapter 3 standard applies to most other
aircraft. Under the Chapter 4 standards, none of an aircraft‘s maximum
noise levels at takeoff, landing, and approach can exceed Chapter 3
noise levels. Compliance with the standards is determined by
subtracting an aircraft‘s maximum noise levels at takeoff, flyover, and
approach from the maximum permitted noise levels. The differences
obtained are the noise limit margins. When the three margins are added
together, the total must be 10 EPN dB or greater; and when any of the
two margins are added together, the sum must be 2 EPN dB or greater.
[24] The reductions would occur in aircraft that would replace such
current aircraft as the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320. Reductions would be
different for larger aircraft and regional jets.
[25] National Research Council, Committee on Aeronautics Research and
Technology for Environmental Compatibility, National Academy of
Sciences For Greener Skies: Reducing Environmental Impacts of Aviation
(Washington, D.C.: 2002).
[26] FAA, Aviation and the Environment: A National Vision Statement,
Framework for Goals and Recommended Actions (Washington, D.C.: December
2004).
[27] GAO-08-216T.
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "Subscribe to Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone:
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.
Orders should be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room LM:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
To order by Phone:
Voice: (202) 512-6000:
TDD: (202) 512-2537:
Fax: (202) 512-6061:
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548: