Air Pollution

Improvements Needed in Developing and Managing EPA's Air Quality Models Gao ID: RCED-86-94 April 22, 1986

In response to a congressional request, GAO reported on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) use of air quality models in carrying out the requirements of the Clean Air Act, specifically: (1) the accuracy, adequacy, and cost of the models; (2) the problems and limitations arising from uncertainties associated with the models; and (3) the appropriateness of an agreement between EPA and its contractor for developing a utility-sector air quality analysis model.

GAO noted that: (1) EPA is currently evaluating the accuracy of its air quality models and modifications to reduce the level of uncertainty; (2) EPA needs to develop more refined models to fully implement and monitor the air pollution programs under the act; (3) more refined models are more costly; and (4) EPA entered into a cooperative agreement, which does not require delivery of a product, rather than a contract, to obtain a utility-sector model. GAO found that: (1) EPA models overestimated pollutant concentrations, resulting in industry spending millions of dollars on unnecessary pollution control equipment, replacement fuel, and studies to justify increased emissions; (2) EPA does not have the number of models it needs to properly administer the act's requirements; (3) the costs of developing a model range from $50,000 to several million dollars; and (4) a new utility-sector analysis model that was approved for development in 1980, and was expected to be completed in 1983, has not yet been developed.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.