The Federal Procurement Data System--Making It Work Better

Gao ID: PSAD-80-33 April 18, 1980

GAO was requested to examine the effectiveness of the Federal Procurement Data System.

Progress has been made in setting up the system despite initial difficulties. Areas in need of greater progress include timeliness of reporting by the agencies and accuracy of the data submitted. Some agencies are still having difficulty in meeting the due dates for data. The Federal Procurement Data Center provided information from eight agencies which provided data in a timely manner, but had difficulty with the number of errors in their data. The accuracy of the system depends on the integrity of many individuals to prepare reports correctly. If a report is not prepared, the contract award data will not enter the system. The cost of converting the existing Department of Defense (DOD) contractor identification system to the recommended Dun and Bradstreet system would be about $1.45 million. GAO does not believe that the difference between the capabilities of a modified DOD system and the Dun and Bradstreet system justify the added costs that ihe Government will incur. The Center experienced a 5 percent cost overrun on its contract for computer processing time and paid for two software packages which it could not use because insufficient time was allowed for proper implementation of a database management system. Consequently, a less complex system was installed. A feasibility study is planned to determine the most economic method of acquiring computer time.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.