Factors Influencing DOD Decisions To Convert Activities From In-House to Contractor Performance

Gao ID: PLRD-81-19 April 22, 1981

GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) implementation of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-76 to find out how much contracting out is taking place because of: (1) personnel ceilings; (2) wage differentials between Federal blue-collar and contractor employees; and (3) other significant influences.

GAO found that: (1) the most significant influence on decisions to contract out was a cost comparison showing lower costs for contractor performance; (2) estimated cost savings were generally attributable to the contractors' plans to use fewer employees and to pay lower wages; (3) the military services recognize that the Commercial and Industrial-Type Activities program is a valuable means of reducing their civilian personnel work force; (4) there was no evidence that the desire to circumvent personnel ceilings led to contracting-out decisions; (5) the Army disregarded serious shortcomings in the contractor's proposal in making its cost comparison; (6) required reviews were not made in 5 of the 12 cases to ensure that the in-house cost estimates were based on the most efficient and cost effective organization and staffing; (7) in one case, an incomplete statement of work in a solicitation for bids significantly overstated the estimated cost comparison savings from contracting out; (8) in one case, the contract price was understated because the most current Service Contract Act wage rates were not used; and (9) six of the 12 cost comparisons included contract administration cost estimates which were lower than the actual costs that could be expected.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.