The Air Force Can Improve Its Maintenance Information Systems

Gao ID: GGD-83-20 January 25, 1983

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed certain maintenance activities at the Air Force to identify where information technology can benefit agencies in terms of economy and efficiency. The review suggested ways to improve Air Force maintenance information management, as well as the Air Force information management program.

GAO found that the Air Force spends millions of dollars on data collection and reporting systems which have questionable value. GAO noted that recording errors have often resulted in inaccurate reports and figures from the Air Force's Maintenance Data Collection (MDC) system, and managers are often reluctant to use this system or the systems it supports because of the known inaccuracies. The data inaccuracies raise questions about the need for much of the maintenance data collected. The Air Force is testing an Automated Maintenance System (AMS) that has the potential to improve maintenance data collection and indications show that it will improve data accuracy and completeness. However, current plans by Air Force commands could result in unnecessary expenditures for separate AMS type computers. Despite these efforts, no significant improvements have been made to improve the maintenance data collection process. GAO concluded that the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 provides the framework for effectively managing information-related activities and, although the Air Force has begun to implement the act's objectives, more needs to be done.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: William S. Franklin Team: General Accounting Office: General Government Division Phone: (202) 512-6234


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.