Federal Advisory Committee Act

Advisory Committee Process Appears to Be Working, but Some Concerns Exist Gao ID: T-GGD-98-163 July 14, 1998

Federal agencies often receive advice from advisory committees, which numbered 963 governmentwide in fiscal year 1997. These committees are to be established and operate in accordance with requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Congress is currently exploring possible improvements to FACA. GAO surveyed (1) advisory committee members on the extent to which their committees provide balanced and independent advice and recommendations as required by FACA, (2) federal agencies on the extent to which they found compliance with FACA useful or burdensome, and (3) advisory committee members and federal agencies on the extent to which they believed that the public was afforded access to advisory committee proceedings and a means to express their views to agencies and their advisory committees. This testimony summarizes a July 1998 report (GAO/GGD-98-147) summarizing the responses received by GAO, which provided useful insights into the general operations of FACA.

GAO noted that: (1) advisory committees appear to be adhering to the requirements of FACA and Executive Order 12838, which led to the establishment of ceilings for each agency on the number of discretionary advisory committees; (2) these requirements do not appear to be overly burdensome to agencies; (3) although the responses of committee members and agencies portrayed a more positive than negative image of FACA, their responses did raise concerns and issues that the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology may wish to explore in its consideration of FACA; (4) there appears to be some concern among agencies about the possibility of being sued for noncompliance with FACA if they obtain input from parties who are outside of the agency and its advisory committees; (5) GSA's Committee Management Secretariat has fallen short of fulfilling its FACA oversight responsibilities; (6) further, GSA did not ensure that the advisory committees were established with complete charters and justification letters; (7) 36 percent of the 203 advisory committee charters and 38 percent of the 107 justification letters from October 1996 through July 1997 that GAO reviewed were missing one or more items required by FACA or GSA regulations; and (8) GSA said that it will take immediate action to improve its oversight.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.