Veterans' Health Care

Fiscal Year 2000 Budget Gao ID: HEHS-99-189R September 14, 1999

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) plans to spend an additional $900 million requested for veterans' medical care and the likelihood of VHA's achieving its proposed management efficiency savings.

GAO noted that: (1) VHA intends to spend an additional $900 million appropriation for expenditures that were originally to be financed through management efficiency savings; (2) more specifically, about $800 million is to fund payroll increases, inflation, and other mandatory rate changes, such as for property rentals; (3) VHA would use the remaining $100 million to enhance its extended care services; (4) this, in effect, leaves $800 million of VHA's spending plan--primarily for service enhancements--to be offset by efficiency savings; (5) although VHA can achieve significant management efficiency savings in fiscal year (FY) 2000, an $800 million savings target seems unlikely;assessment indicates that VHA has identified a wide array of efficiency initiatives that, if implemented in a timely manner, could yield about $600 million of savings in FY 2000; (7) these initiatives include, for example, shifting veterans' care to more appropriate settings or reengineering clinical and administrative processes--actions that in the past afforded VHA the opportunity to provide the same or higher-quality services at lower costs; (8) as GAO has previously reported, beyond the savings that VHA can achieve by implementing initiatives it has already identified, GAO believes a realignment of VHA's capital assets is critical to its continued ability to realize significant savings that could be reinvested to enhance medical care for veterans; and (9) therefore, it seems essential that VHA carry out its commitment to systematically assess its major health care delivery markets as quickly as possible.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.