Improvements Needed in DOD Procedures To Prevent Reimbursement of Unallowable Costs on Government Contracts

Gao ID: NSIAD-85-81 May 7, 1985

GAO reviewed final overhead cost settlements with defense contractors to determine the extent to which questionable costs were allowed.

GAO found numerous instances where administrative contracting officers (ACO) allowed costs that the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) questioned. Overall, 53 percent of the costs questioned by DCAA were allowed as overhead by ACO. GAO believes that: (1) the discrepancies are caused by varying interpretations of certain ambiguous provisions in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); and (2) contractors continue to claim reimbursement for unallowable costs, such as advertising and promotional expenses, because ACO often agree to compromise cost settlements that do not address specific cost items. Certain changes have been proposed to FAR that specify the circumstances under which advertising and public relations costs are allowable.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Paul F. Math Team: General Accounting Office: National Security and International Affairs Division Phone: (202) 275-4587


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.