Federal Advisory Committee Act

General Services Administration's Management of Advisory Committee Activities Gao ID: GGD-89-10 October 5, 1988

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated the extent to which the General Services Administration (GSA) has carried out its responsibilities under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA).

GAO found that GSA: (1) reviewed and concurred with all 114 advisory committee charters that federal agencies proposed between October 1, 1986 and May 16, 1988, although 52 of the proposals lacked information required to determine compliance with FACA; (2) did not advise Congress that it had not verified information in agencies' required annual reports regarding committee procedures, accomplishments, membership, and meeting frequency before submitting the reports to Congress; (3) agreed with agencies to continue 86 committees into fiscal year 1988, although those committees had not met during the previous year and had incurred costs of about $535,000; (4) did not timely submit to Congress its annual reports on all committee activities, statuses, and changes; (6) has not submitted follow-up reports regarding the actions taken on committee recommendations since 1980; and (6) conducted less analysis of committee costs, meetings, and other activities in current reports than in earlier reports. GAO also found that the GSA Secretariat Director, who was responsible for all advisory committee administration matters: (1) blamed inadequate GSA staff resources for its selective implementation of FACA responsibilities; and (2) is developing plans to establish procedures for full FACA compliance.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.