Space Station

Update on the Impact of the Expanded Russian Role Gao ID: NSIAD-94-248 July 29, 1994

Contrary to claims that Russian participation in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) proposed international space station would save $2 billion, GAO's analysis shows that there are no net savings from Russian participation that could be used to fund other areas of the program and accelerate the space station schedule. The $2 billion in savings would be largely offset by (1) at least $1.4 billion in program changes to accommodate the Russians and (2) $400 million in funding requirements arising from lower than anticipated contributions of Russian hardware. NASA still believes that it can meet its assembly schedule and $17.4 billion funding target. However, NASA will have to find substantial savings from other sources to offset the Russian-related funding increases and accelerate the schedule. NASA recently identified additional shuttle improvements that will be needed as a result of Russian participation, which could further boost space station funding requirements.

GAO found that: (1) there are no net savings from Russian participation in the space station program that could be used to fund other program areas and accelerate the station's assembly schedule; (2) Russian participation could add $0.4 billion in program funding requirements because of lower than anticipated hardware contributions; (3) NASA will have to find substantial savings from other sources to meet its assembly schedule and funding target; (4) increased program funding needs will likely cancel any anticipated savings from expanded Russian participation; and (5) other program funding requirements will also increase due to contracts with Russia for space-related activities, shuttle improvements and modifications, and additional shuttle flights to assemble the new station.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.